Pakistan to move ICJ over India's human rights violations in Occupied Kashmir

[Peshwa]

India first has to agree to mediation by ICJ.
Pakistan can take the case, means little if India doesn’t accept the arbitration or mediation. ie. Agree to take this to court (ICJ)
There is zero jurisdiction for the ICJ to impose the case or verdict upon India.

Futile exercise as India simply will not accept ICJs mediation in this regard.

 

[shah_123]

Waste of time and money.---

 

[SecularNationalist]

i still dont if he was a spy then he knew about the consequences of getting caught

Come on man he killed hundreds of Pakistani civilians just for your Bharat mata and took orders like a true indian Patriot.You should give him a credit where it's due.

 

[HAIDER]

extremely dangerous move

 

[fitpOsitive]

PM Imran to send message to Modi in his speech to local Hindu community during upcoming visit to Tharparkar: sources

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistani government has decided to approach the International Court of Justice (ICJ) over widespread human rights abuses by Indian forces in Occupied Kashmir.

Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi confirmed the decision. "An in-principle decision has been taken to take the issue of disputed Kashmir to the International Court of Justice," the foreign minister said on Tuesday.

He said all legal aspects were considered before taking the decision, and that the matter would be taken to the ICJ as soon as possible. He said the law ministry would soon issue further details in this regard.

The decision comes after Pakistan's recent diplomatic victory at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), which met for the first time in over five decades last week to discuss the critical situation in Indian occupied Kashmir.

During the meeting, UNSC members urged parties to the Kashmir dispute to refrain from taking any unilateral action, effectively rejecting India's stance that Kashmir was an internal issue and not an internationally recognised dispute.

Trump phones PM Imran, expresses desire to reduce tension in region: FM Qureshi


The disputed territory of Jammu and Kashmir has been divided between India and Pakistan since independence from Britain in 1947. It was extremely rare for the Security Council to discuss Kashmir. The last time there was a full Security Council meeting on the Himalayan region was in 1965.

Sources told Geo News that four of the five permanent members – China, the United States, Great Britain, and Russia – openly backed Pakistan's stance at the UNSC meeting last week.

They said that, during the meeting, Britain called for an investigation into reports of torture and human rights violations in Indian occupied Kashmir.

Only France opposed Pakistan's position at the UNSC meeting, they said.

Pakistan's Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi will soon start a diplomatic campaign over the Kashmir issue.

Sources said that Prime Minister Imran Khan is expected to send a message to his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi in his speech to the local Hindu community during his upcoming visit to Tharparkar's Shiv Mandir.

Source link

It's the blood of Muslims, and it's free, at the moment.

 

[Soumitra]

Neither side shall seek to alter it unilaterally, irrespective of mutual differences and legal interpretations. Both sides further undertake to refrain from the threat or the use of force in violation of this line"

1 We are NOT altering the LoC. What we did was change the administrative way in our side of the LoC
2 During Kargil War Pakistan tried to unilaterally alter the Line of Control.

 

[Dil Pakistan]

India first has to agree to mediation by ICJ.
Pakistan can take the case, means little if India doesn’t accept the arbitration or mediation. ie. Agree to take this to court (ICJ)
There is zero jurisdiction for the ICJ to impose the case or verdict upon India.

Futile exercise as India simply will not accept ICJs mediation in this regard.

1). It is a court, not U.N. - If India is a signatory to ICJ she has no way out. The law works differently.

2). In my view Pakistan should also take the case to the War Crimes Tribunal in Hague - again powerful body, if India is a signatory.

 

[JohnyD]

Indians have better lawyers (liars ;-)) than Pakistan .. You certainly gonna lose!

 

[war&peace]

ooh what did I write ..my keyboard was Turkish

 

[PaulSimon]

This is a masterstroke by Pakistan. India dug its own grave when it took the Kulbhushan Jadhav's case to ICJ.

 

[Arsalan 345]

Waste of time.india will never accept to fight this case at icj.basically we have no options left.

 

[Furious]

Before monkeys of either color jump in... Would love to know under what convention this case be pleaded?

As far as legalise goes...almost impossible to prosecute. There needs to be a solid evidence of mass genocide for ICJ to even consider interfering.

Even before the legality, India has to accept ICJ intervention first, then there will be jurisdiction hearing. Not possible. Public consumption move.

Come on man he killed hundreds of Pakistani civilians just for your Bharat mata and took orders like a true indian Patriot.You should give him a credit where it's due.

First of all not one shred of evidence of any wrongdoing by him has been provided and second if you think he has killed 100s of people in Pakistan, then dont you think he has done his job and knew what kind of mission he is getting into. Usually countries who send spies for sabotage or assassination make it clear that in case of getting compromised, the state will refuse any connection and responsibility. ( I dont support any terrorist activity, just extrapolating from your statement )

 

[airmarshal]

Well done Imran Khan. This is how to deal with India.

 

[SecularNationalist]

Even before the legality, India has to accept ICJ intervention first, then there will be jurisdiction hearing. Not possible. Public consumption move.


First of all not one shred of evidence of any wrongdoing by him has been provided and second if you think he has killed 100s of people in Pakistan, then dont you think he has done his job and knew what kind of mission he is getting into. Usually countries who send spies for sabotage or assassination make it clear that in case of getting compromised, the state will refuse any connection and responsibility. ( I dont support any terrorist activity, just extrapolating from your statement )

Then why you are trying to save him desperately.Indians are known for their hypocricy.

 

[Furious]

Then why you are trying to save him desperately.Indians are known for their hypocricy.

Think again before you post. Read it properly this time.