What's new

Pakistan to get 2 nuclear reactors from China

There is little US can do in this regard, it has no influence over China and because of its constant refusal, little left over Pakistan as far as this matter is concerned. Pakistan is an energy strived country and we need everything and anything that we can get to some how over come this huge shortage the nation is facing.
 
.
China began building a nuclear reactor in Chashma in Pakistan's Punjab province in 1991 and work on a second rector began in 2005 and is expected to be completed next year. Under the new agreement, Chinese companies will build at least two new 650-MW reactors at Chashma.

So is that mean we are getting 2 new 650MW reactors? :woot:

I don't think so i guess its mistake they were meant to say 2 new reactors with total generation capacity of 650MW. :cheers:

I did not read any such plans of 650MW design yet....... all i know is Chashma 3&4 and then we will be heading towards 1000MW Nuclear reactor in Karachi (KANUP) for which the land has already been bought
 
. . .
Chinese company confirms Pakistan reactor deal

ANANTH KRISHNAN
SHARE · PRINT · T+
Move goes against the norms of the Nuclear Suppliers Group

China's biggest operator of nuclear power plants has confirmed that it will export two 340 MW nuclear power reactors to Pakistan in a $2.375-billion agreement, in a controversial deal that analysts say goes against internationally-mandated guidelines governing the transfer of nuclear technology.

The China National Nuclear Corporation, which has already set up two civilian nuclear power reactors in Pakistan, has now signed construction contracts to build two more.

The two governments had in principle agreed on the deal during President Hu Jintao's visit to Islamabad in 2006. But they are yet to publicly formalise the deal.

The CNNC, however, has said in a statement, posted on its website last month, that it had reached the agreement “with the aim of developing an overseas nuclear power electricity market”.

The CNNC has already agreed to build two power reactors in Pakistan, the 325 MW Chashma-1, which started operating in 2000, and Chashma-2, which will be completed next year. The statement said the two new reactors are “2x340 MW”. “Chashma-2 will be a benchmark for C-3 and C-4 projects,” said the statement. On February 12, the two governments had signed a loan contract which went into effect in March, according to the CNNC.

But, Chinese officials on Thursday continued to deny a deal was in place. One official said while the government had given its backing to the deal in principle, some final details still had to be ironed out .

But other diplomats said the government's caution was sourced in the debate the deal was likely to trigger in the international community.

The deal goes against the guidelines of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), of which China has been a member since 2004. The NSG does not allow the sale of nuclear equipment to countries that have not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and do not have a Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency. When India signed the civilian nuclear agreement with the United States, this requirement was waived.

Chinese officials on Thursday did not say whether China had approached the NSG or how it planned to secure a waiver.

All officials said was the deal would “strictly follow” the IAEA norms and the reactors would come under the IAEA's supervision.

Officials also defended China's nuclear relationship with Pakistan, amid concerns over Pakistan's proliferation record.

Asked about the deal, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Jiang Yu said: “In recent years, China and Pakistan have been cooperating in the field of civilian use nuclear energy. Our co-operation is consistent with the two countries' international obligations, is for peaceful purposes and is subject to the IAEA's regulations and supervision.”

Possible concerns in India “would not be relevant” to China's nuclear engagement with Pakistan, said Zhao Gancheng, a scholar at the Shanghai Institute for International Studies (SIIS).

“India, too, signed a civilian nuclear deal with the United States,” he said.

While China voiced opposition to the Indo-U.S. nuclear deal, officials now often cite the deal as precedent for greater nuclear exchanges with Pakistan.

The deal, if agreed, would be consistent with China's policy to expand nuclear energy sector and support other countries' access to civilian nuclear energy for peaceful means, said Mr. Zhao.

“China's official position is to support every country's right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes,” he said. “So China will certainly do what it can to help countries, including Pakistan.”

The Hindu : News / International : Chinese company confirms Pakistan reactor deal
 
.
Is US okay with China supplying N-reactors to Pak?

By choosing to keep mum over China's plans to deliver two new nuclear reactors to Pakistan, the Obama [ Images ] administration has once again enlisted the co-operation of China in strengthening Pakistan's capacity in various fields. Indian policy-makers ought to take this seriously, writes B Raman.

When he was Pakistan president, General Pervez Musharraf [ Images ] had sought to counter the Indo-US deal on civilian nuclear co-operation at two levels. He did not oppose the deal. Nor did Pakistan energetically try to have the deal disapproved by US Congress through Congressmen sympathetic to it.

Instead, it sought to counter the deal by using the following arguments. First, it would be discriminatory to Pakistan if it (the nuclear deal) was not made applicable to it too. Second, it would create a military nuclear asymmetry in the subcontinent by enabling India [ Images ] to divert its domestic stock of fuel for military purposes, while using the imported fuel for civilian purposes under international safeguards. Thus, it would have an adverse effect on Pakistan's national security.

The Bush administration rejected the Pakistani arguments by pointing out that Pakistan's economy was unlikely to grow as rapidly as the Indian economy in the short and medium terms and hence it should be possible to meet its energy requirements from conventional sources. The Bush administration also repeatedly made it clear that in view of the role of Dr AQ Khan -- the so-called father of Pakistan's atomic bomb -- and some of his colleagues in clandestinely supplying nuclear technology to Iran, North Korea and Libya, Pakistan cannot be treated on par with India, which had an unimpeachable record of non-proliferation.

During his State visit to China in February 2006, Musharraf requested for Chinese assistance in the construction of six more nuclear power stations, with a capacity of 600 or 900 MW each. The Chinese reportedly agreed in principle to supply two stations of 300 MWs each to be followed later by four more.

This subject again figured in the general's bilateral discussions with President Hu Jintao on the margins of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in June 2006, and in the subsequent discussions between the officials of the two countries, who met at Islamabad [ Images ] and Beijing [ Images ] for doing the preparatory work for Hu's visit to Pakistan from November 23 to 26, 2006.

General Musharraf and his officials were so confident that an agreement in principle for the construction of two nuclear power stations would be initialled during Hu's visit that they even set up a site selection task force.

However, there was no substantive reference to the co-operation between China and Pakistan in the field of civilian nuclear energy during Hu's visit to Pakistan. The joint statement issued on November 25, 2006, by General Musharraf and Hu said: 'The two sides also agreed to strengthen cooperation in the energy sector, including fossil fuels, coal, hydro-power, nuclear power, renewable sources of energy as well as in the mining and resources sector.'

Addressing a press conference after his talks with General Musharraf, Hu said in reply to a question on nuclear co-operation: 'Cooperation in the energy sector is an important component in the relationship between the two countries. We reached a common understanding on strengthening energy cooperation. We would continue this cooperation in future as well.'

While Hu himself did not refer to any future supply of new nuclear power stations, some Pakistani analysts interpreted Hu's remarks as indicating a willingness to supply more nuclear power stations.

Well-informed Pakistani sources attributed the more-guarded Chinese position to the bilateral discussions between President George Bush [ Images ] and Hu at Hanoi in the margins of the summit of the Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation organisation on November 18 and 19, 2006.

The speculation was that during these bilateral discussions, Bush pointed out to Hu that the Chinese supply of new nuclear power stations to Pakistan could not be projected as a continuation of the Chinese assistance to Pakistan under a 1985 bilateral co-operation treaty under which Chashma and Chashma II were given and hence would need the clearance of the NSG.

According to this speculation, Bush was also reported to have referred to the Pakistani rejection of repeated requests from the International Atomic Energy Agency to hand over Dr AQ Khan for an independent interrogation and pointed out that the Chinese supply of the new power stations could encourage Pakistan's non-cooperation with the IAEA.

The Chinese attempt to project its proposal to supply two more power reactors to Pakistan as continuation of an old project of 1985 entered into by China with Pakistan before the NSG safeguards imposing restrictions on the supply of civilian nuclear equipment and technology to countries that have not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and not a new project was rejected by the Bush administration.

The Chinese sought to compare their Chashma project with the Russian project for the supply of nuclear power stations to India being set up at Koodankulam in Tamil Nadu. The Russians went ahead with the project on the ground that the agreement for its construction had been reached before the NSG restrictions went into effect.

Following the rejection of the Chinese arguments by the Bush administration, the Chinese did not take any further action for going ahead with their proposal. During their visits to China, President Asif Ali Zardari [ Images ] and other Pakistani leaders kept pressing the Chinese to finalise the agreement and start its implementation. The Chinese were reluctant to do so.

In a surprise move, the Chinese have now announced that they are going ahead with the project. There have been two announcements in this regard. The first is by the China National Nuclear Corporation, which set up Chashma I and is now constructing Chashma II. It has now announced that an agreement for the provision of a Chinese loan for two new nuclear reactors at the Chashma site designated as Chashma III and IV was signed with Pakistan on February 12 and that it went into effect in March 2010.

The second announcement is in the form of a confirmation by the Chinese foreign ministry. The Global Times, the English daily of the Party-owned People's Daily group, reported as follows on April 30, 2010: 'Beijing confirmed Thursday (April 29) that Chinese and Pakistani officials have signed an agreement to finance the construction of two nuclear reactors, to be built in Pakistan by Chinese firms. Jiang Yu, a spokeswoman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said Thursday that the nuclear deal conforms to international standards set by the International Atomic Energy Agency.'

The paper quoted Shen Dingli, executive deputy president at the Institute of International Studies at Fudan University, as saying: 'Beijing and Islamabad had started joint civilian nuclear projects before China joined the NSG in 2004, which means the mutual cooperation is legal. Washington can't find reasons to criticise Sino-Pakistani nuclear cooperation.'

This is a reiteration of the original Chinese stand that Chashma III and IV are extensions of an agreement of 1985 signed before the NSG safeguards went into effect and hence not affected. This would also indicate that China does not consider it necessary to seek the approval of the NSG for going ahead with the construction of Chashma III and IV.

The surprise Chinese announcement has come at a time when Pakistan has stepped up pressure on the US for a US-Pakistan civilian nuclear co-operation agreement similar to the agreement signed with India in July 2005, followed by action to have the restrictions against Pakistan lifted. This issue was raised by Pakistan at the recent ministerial-level strategic dialogue between the two countries at Washington, DC.

While the Obama administration was reported to have rejected the Pakistani request, there were indications that it was treating the AQ Khan affair as a closed chapter and was sympathetic to Pakistan's energy needs. The US has already made a commitment to help Pakistan improve its conventional energy production capacity.

While rejecting the Pakistani request for a nuclear agreement once again -- though not as firmly as was repeatedly done by the Bush administration -- did the Obama administration indicate to China that it would not raise an objection to China's going ahead with its proposal for the construction of Chashma III and IV by accepting the Chinese interpretation that it did not attract the NSG safeguards?

If so -- I am inclined to believe it is -- this is the second instance in which the Obama administration has enlisted the co-operation of China in strengthening Pakistan's capacity in various fields.

The Los Angeles Times reported on May 25, 2009, that the Obama administration had appealed to China to provide training and even military equipment to help Pakistan counter a growing militant threat and that Richard C Holbrooke, the administration's special representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan, had visited Beijing in this connection for talks with the Chinese authorities.

Following his visit, the Chinese government announced an aid package of $290 million to enable Pakistan strengthen its counter-terrorism capability.

Indications of the Obama administration taking a benign view of China's military and nuclear co-operation with Pakistan ought to be taken seriously by Indian policy-makers.

Is US okay with China supplying N-reactors to Pak?: Rediff.com India News
 
.
Yes..... its absolutely ok for China to help create a Pakistani Civil Nuclear Infrastructure....and Pakistan has full right to utilize these nuclear Power reactors to generate much needed power for its economy.
 
.
How many medium range Nuclear reactor Does Pakistan Need to overcome power (Electricity) problem?
 
.
More than 10.....to create a sustainable power supply infrastructure....that supports current and future requirements.
 
.
.
True. USA could not stop China helping Pakistan develop nuclear weapons, and they cannot stop N-reactors either.

But how will they react is a totally different thing. How will it affect the US-Pakistan 'co-dependence' which has grown substantially in the past few years? Interesting ..............
 
.
Thus the USA can do nothing other than stay in Pakistan's Good Books by accepting it!

And why should it do anything other than 'stay in Pakistan's good books' by accepting this? Especially since the door to nuclear cooperation with non-NPT signatories was opened by the US itself with the NSG waiver for India pushed by the US.

These plants, like the CHASNUPP I, II and KANNUP NPP's, will be under IAEA safeguards, and on the civilian NPP front Pakistan has had an impeccable record. Pakistan could have used the spent fuel from KANNUP (Heavy water plant) for its plutonium based WMD program, but it did not violate its IAEA obligations and all the spent fuel is so far accounted for.
 
Last edited:
.
Is US okay with China supplying N-reactors to Pak?

By choosing to keep mum over China's plans to deliver two new nuclear reactors to Pakistan, the Obama [ Images ] administration has once again enlisted the co-operation of China in strengthening Pakistan's capacity in various fields. Indian policy-makers ought to take this seriously, writes B Raman.

When he was Pakistan president, General Pervez Musharraf [ Images ] had sought to counter the Indo-US deal on civilian nuclear co-operation at two levels. He did not oppose the deal. Nor did Pakistan energetically try to have the deal disapproved by US Congress through Congressmen sympathetic to it.

Instead, it sought to counter the deal by using the following arguments. First, it would be discriminatory to Pakistan if it (the nuclear deal) was not made applicable to it too. Second, it would create a military nuclear asymmetry in the subcontinent by enabling India [ Images ] to divert its domestic stock of fuel for military purposes, while using the imported fuel for civilian purposes under international safeguards. Thus, it would have an adverse effect on Pakistan's national security.

The Bush administration rejected the Pakistani arguments by pointing out that Pakistan's economy was unlikely to grow as rapidly as the Indian economy in the short and medium terms and hence it should be possible to meet its energy requirements from conventional sources. The Bush administration also repeatedly made it clear that in view of the role of Dr AQ Khan -- the so-called father of Pakistan's atomic bomb -- and some of his colleagues in clandestinely supplying nuclear technology to Iran, North Korea and Libya, Pakistan cannot be treated on par with India, which had an unimpeachable record of non-proliferation.

During his State visit to China in February 2006, Musharraf requested for Chinese assistance in the construction of six more nuclear power stations, with a capacity of 600 or 900 MW each. The Chinese reportedly agreed in principle to supply two stations of 300 MWs each to be followed later by four more.

This subject again figured in the general's bilateral discussions with President Hu Jintao on the margins of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in June 2006, and in the subsequent discussions between the officials of the two countries, who met at Islamabad [ Images ] and Beijing [ Images ] for doing the preparatory work for Hu's visit to Pakistan from November 23 to 26, 2006.

General Musharraf and his officials were so confident that an agreement in principle for the construction of two nuclear power stations would be initialled during Hu's visit that they even set up a site selection task force.

However, there was no substantive reference to the co-operation between China and Pakistan in the field of civilian nuclear energy during Hu's visit to Pakistan. The joint statement issued on November 25, 2006, by General Musharraf and Hu said: 'The two sides also agreed to strengthen cooperation in the energy sector, including fossil fuels, coal, hydro-power, nuclear power, renewable sources of energy as well as in the mining and resources sector.'

Addressing a press conference after his talks with General Musharraf, Hu said in reply to a question on nuclear co-operation: 'Cooperation in the energy sector is an important component in the relationship between the two countries. We reached a common understanding on strengthening energy cooperation. We would continue this cooperation in future as well.'

While Hu himself did not refer to any future supply of new nuclear power stations, some Pakistani analysts interpreted Hu's remarks as indicating a willingness to supply more nuclear power stations.

Well-informed Pakistani sources attributed the more-guarded Chinese position to the bilateral discussions between President George Bush [ Images ] and Hu at Hanoi in the margins of the summit of the Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation organisation on November 18 and 19, 2006.

The speculation was that during these bilateral discussions, Bush pointed out to Hu that the Chinese supply of new nuclear power stations to Pakistan could not be projected as a continuation of the Chinese assistance to Pakistan under a 1985 bilateral co-operation treaty under which Chashma and Chashma II were given and hence would need the clearance of the NSG.

According to this speculation, Bush was also reported to have referred to the Pakistani rejection of repeated requests from the International Atomic Energy Agency to hand over Dr AQ Khan for an independent interrogation and pointed out that the Chinese supply of the new power stations could encourage Pakistan's non-cooperation with the IAEA.

The Chinese attempt to project its proposal to supply two more power reactors to Pakistan as continuation of an old project of 1985 entered into by China with Pakistan before the NSG safeguards imposing restrictions on the supply of civilian nuclear equipment and technology to countries that have not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and not a new project was rejected by the Bush administration.

The Chinese sought to compare their Chashma project with the Russian project for the supply of nuclear power stations to India being set up at Koodankulam in Tamil Nadu. The Russians went ahead with the project on the ground that the agreement for its construction had been reached before the NSG restrictions went into effect.

Following the rejection of the Chinese arguments by the Bush administration, the Chinese did not take any further action for going ahead with their proposal. During their visits to China, President Asif Ali Zardari [ Images ] and other Pakistani leaders kept pressing the Chinese to finalise the agreement and start its implementation. The Chinese were reluctant to do so.

In a surprise move, the Chinese have now announced that they are going ahead with the project. There have been two announcements in this regard. The first is by the China National Nuclear Corporation, which set up Chashma I and is now constructing Chashma II. It has now announced that an agreement for the provision of a Chinese loan for two new nuclear reactors at the Chashma site designated as Chashma III and IV was signed with Pakistan on February 12 and that it went into effect in March 2010.

The second announcement is in the form of a confirmation by the Chinese foreign ministry. The Global Times, the English daily of the Party-owned People's Daily group, reported as follows on April 30, 2010: 'Beijing confirmed Thursday (April 29) that Chinese and Pakistani officials have signed an agreement to finance the construction of two nuclear reactors, to be built in Pakistan by Chinese firms. Jiang Yu, a spokeswoman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said Thursday that the nuclear deal conforms to international standards set by the International Atomic Energy Agency.'

The paper quoted Shen Dingli, executive deputy president at the Institute of International Studies at Fudan University, as saying: 'Beijing and Islamabad had started joint civilian nuclear projects before China joined the NSG in 2004, which means the mutual cooperation is legal. Washington can't find reasons to criticise Sino-Pakistani nuclear cooperation.'

This is a reiteration of the original Chinese stand that Chashma III and IV are extensions of an agreement of 1985 signed before the NSG safeguards went into effect and hence not affected. This would also indicate that China does not consider it necessary to seek the approval of the NSG for going ahead with the construction of Chashma III and IV.

The surprise Chinese announcement has come at a time when Pakistan has stepped up pressure on the US for a US-Pakistan civilian nuclear co-operation agreement similar to the agreement signed with India in July 2005, followed by action to have the restrictions against Pakistan lifted. This issue was raised by Pakistan at the recent ministerial-level strategic dialogue between the two countries at Washington, DC.

While the Obama administration was reported to have rejected the Pakistani request, there were indications that it was treating the AQ Khan affair as a closed chapter and was sympathetic to Pakistan's energy needs. The US has already made a commitment to help Pakistan improve its conventional energy production capacity.

While rejecting the Pakistani request for a nuclear agreement once again -- though not as firmly as was repeatedly done by the Bush administration -- did the Obama administration indicate to China that it would not raise an objection to China's going ahead with its proposal for the construction of Chashma III and IV by accepting the Chinese interpretation that it did not attract the NSG safeguards?

If so -- I am inclined to believe it is -- this is the second instance in which the Obama administration has enlisted the co-operation of China in strengthening Pakistan's capacity in various fields.

The Los Angeles Times reported on May 25, 2009, that the Obama administration had appealed to China to provide training and even military equipment to help Pakistan counter a growing militant threat and that Richard C Holbrooke, the administration's special representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan, had visited Beijing in this connection for talks with the Chinese authorities.

Following his visit, the Chinese government announced an aid package of $290 million to enable Pakistan strengthen its counter-terrorism capability.

Indications of the Obama administration taking a benign view of China's military and nuclear co-operation with Pakistan ought to be taken seriously by Indian policy-makers.

Is US okay with China supplying N-reactors to Pak?: Rediff.com India News

The Los Angeles times is load of crap. I dont get it What role can the US possibly play between Pakistan and China as far as military cooperation is concerned. Pakistan does not need nor sought any US help to secure any Chinese deal what so ever. Why pretending to be the Good Guys in fields where it hardly matters in the 1st place. Same stands for nuclear cooperation. The deal in it self is an extension to the already place cooperation between the 2 sides before the NSG safeguards were put in place and hence does not require approval.
 
.
China must seek NSG exception, says U.S.

BEIJING: China will first have to seek an exception from the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) before it can go ahead with its plan to export two nuclear power reactors to Pakistan, a top United States official has said.

China last month announced it would set up two civilian nuclear power reactors in Pakistan. The deal has triggered debate in India and the U.S. on nuclear proliferation, as the NSG guidelines disallow the transfer of nuclear equipment to countries who have not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

While the Chinese government has insisted its agreement with Pakistan followed international guidelines, U.S. Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asian Affairs Robert Blake said on Tuesday the U.S. government's position was the deal could not go ahead unless China first obtained an exception from the NSG. “I would just say that we are aware of those reports [of the deal] and to the extent that China does want to try to provide additional reactors to Pakistan, that would require an exception of the guidelines of the Nuclear Suppliers Group,” he said in Beijing, when asked about the deal. “So it would be important that China seek the exception from the NSG.”

He added: “I don't want to prejudge what the outcome of such a discussion would be, but I think that is our position.”

Beijing, however, maintained that the deal “respected international obligations”, Asked by The Hindu if China would seek an exemption, the Foreign Ministry said in a statement: “In recent years, China and Pakistan have been cooperating in the field of civilian use nuclear energy. This cooperation respects international obligations, for peaceful purposes, and accepts the International Atomic Energy Agency's regulation and supervision.”

China's largest operator of nuclear power plants, the Chinese National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC), revealed last month that China and Pakistan had signed a $2.375-billion agreement for two 340 MW power reactors. The CNNC has already set up two nuclear power reactors in Pakistan — the 325 MW Chashma-1, which became operational in 2000, and Chashma-2 which will go online next year.

Chinese officials and analysts have argued that the deal for Chashma-3 and Chashma-4 was part of the earlier agreement for C-1 and C-2, which the NSG had granted exception to. But this position has been questioned by officials and analysts in India and the U.S., who say the deal for C-3 and C-4 was not included in China's declaration of its nuclear commitments to the NSG in 2004.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry on Tuesday did not answer questions from The Hindu on whether China had indeed earlier notified the NSG of the deal for C-3 and C-4, or if it had now sought an exception. The NSG's guidelines prevent the sale and transfer of nuclear equipment to countries who have not signed the NPT and do not have a Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement with the IAEA. India was granted a special waiver to this requirement for the civilian nuclear deal with the U.S.
 
.
Pakistan was seeking equal treatment as India, but it may have turned out to be more equal in the bargain, says T P Sreenivasan.

The signals from Washington in the last two months were clearly in favour of civilian nuclear cooperation with Pakistan after a couple of think-tanks came to the conclusion that the imbalance in South Asia, created by the India-US nuclear deal, should be rectified.

Scholars like Professor Steve Cohen of the Brookings Institution in Washington openly favoured it, even though he thought that it would not happen. Even as the Obama administration kept denying it, Hillary Clinton hinted at a parallel approach to India and Pakistan on nuclear matters. The contours of a new nuclear landscape have emerged with the announcement that China will build two nuclear reactors in Pakistan to restore the nuclear balance in South Asia.

China confirmed on April 29, 2010 that Chinese and Pakistani officials have signed an agreement to finance the construction of two nuclear reactors to be built in Pakistan by Chinese firms. China has also claimed that the deal is in conformity with the international standards set by the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, recalling that China and Pakistan had begun cooperation in civil nuclear projects in 2004, before China joined the Nuclear Supplier Group, NSG. The reactors proposed to be built in Pakistan by China will have a capacity of 300 MWS each and four more similar reactors are supposed to be in the pipeline.

The curious thing about the deal is that the Non-proliferation ayatollahs in the US have reacted calmly to the news. Former US congresswoman Ellen Taucher, the new nonproliferation czar of the Obama administration's reaction was timid. 'These things take a long time. So I am going to wait and see,' she said. At best, she is accepting the inevitable, at worst; she is revealing complicity in the deal, which has been seen in Washington as a necessary evil.

If Washington was going to face the flak at the NPT Review Conference this month in New York on account of the India deal, it might as well take Pakistan and China on its side against the onslaught of the non-Nuclear Weapons States.

China had insisted, throughout the long debate on the India-US nuclear deal that any exception given to India should be on the basis of criteria and not discriminatory. When it finally acquiesced in the NSG waiver for India, China had made up its mind either to persuade the US to give a similar deal to Pakistan or to take law into its own hands and present to the world a fait accompli. China has done better by securing the understanding of the US before announcing the deal with Pakistan.

The details of the Pakistan-China deal are far from clear, but the stringent conditions India has accepted in its deal with the US seem to be absent in the instant case. Pakistan has neither agreed to throw open its nuclear reactors to IAEA inspections, nor has reached any agreement with the IAEA on safeguards, including the Additional Protocol, permitting intrusive inspections, which India has accepted. Perhaps, these conditions may come up when the matter is brought up at the NSG.

But given the US position, the NSG may, at best, impose the same conditions as in the Indian case. But in the case of China, the transparent process in the US Congress and elsewhere will be absent and Pakistan is likely to sail through the NSG, with conditions similar to those implicit in the India waiver.

Interestingly, China does not seem to have claimed exemption under the 'grandfather clause' for the supply by arguing that the present deal was part of the 1985 agreement, which led to the construction of two reactors in Pakistan. The argument clearly is that the deal is necessary to restore the nuclear balance in South Asia, a right China arrogates to itself with the acceptance of the US.

China has accepted the Pakistani contention that India will be able to strengthen its weapons capability by devoting its entire production of fissile material for arms, while securing enough supplies of uranium from abroad for peaceful uses.

Apart from the current mood in Washington to appease Pakistan in the context of its Afpak policy, there are two reasons why the US will not object to the Pakistan-China deal at the NSG or elsewhere. It needs China's support immediately to impose sanctions against Iran and China may well have extracted its price for an abstention on the Iran sanctions resolution in the Security Council. Contrary to the provisions of the UN Charter, an abstention by a permanent member has come to be considered as assent.

Secondly, Pakistan has been blocking the negotiations in the Conference on Disarmament (CD) on a Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT), much to the chagrin of a majority of member States. China may well have insisted that Pakistan should let the FMCT negotiations go forward, now that Pakistan had the facility of importing reactors without signing the NPT.

This clean operation of a deal by proxy leaves India in a quandary. The prime minister has already hinted that India would have no objection if Pakistan was allowed to have civil nuclear trade. We would find it delicate to object to the Pakistan-China deal if it happens to have the same conditions that India accepted. Since the US has not given a deal to Pakistan, its earlier objections on the basis of Pakistan's track record have been overcome.

While India is waiting for the nuclear liability bill and the necessary internal procedures in the US to begin nuclear trade with the US, Pakistan may well have two nuclear reactors constructed on its own soil. Pakistan will not have to find the money to pay either as the Pakistan-China agreement speaks of 'financing' the construction of the reactors. Pakistan was seeking equal treatment as India, but it may have turned out to be more equal in the bargain.
T P Sreenivasan
 
.
Back
Top Bottom