What's new

Pakistan to build a Nuclear submarine

. . . . .
well indian friends tell you what you are right but pakistan is a nation who is use to get out of worse of the worst we have prooven it many times against you dont worry we have our probleums but when we fight with you than you will see our real toys wait yes we have all the probleums of entire world in pakistan but never count pakistan out because once we get out of these probleums you willl see different pakistan 100000 times better than your india we have worlds richest reserves which your entire india dosent have so give some respect
 
.
well indian friends tell you what you are right but pakistan is a nation who is use to get out of worse of the worst we have prooven it many times against you dont worry we have our probleums but when we fight with you than you will see our real toys wait yes we have all the probleums of entire world in pakistan but never count pakistan out because once we get out of these probleums you willl see different pakistan 100000 times better than your india we have worlds richest reserves which your entire india dosent have so give some respect

What ??:woot:
 
.
well indian friends tell you what you are right but pakistan is a nation who is use to get out of worse of the worst we have prooven it many times against you dont worry we have our probleums but when we fight with you than you will see our real toys wait yes we have all the probleums of entire world in pakistan but never count pakistan out because once we get out of these probleums you willl see different pakistan 100000 times better than your india we have worlds richest reserves which your entire india dosent have so give some respect

cartoon…:coffee::azn::pop:
 
.
i think AIP subs with nukes is a better and cheaper option
the indurance of a nucllear sub is 70-90 days while an AIp is 30-35 days
thats the main difference ..their are arguments that which one is quieter but both will switch to batteries when they are in danger spot..
 
.
:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:
Insallah.
:omghaha::omghaha:

well indian friends tell you what you are right but pakistan is a nation who is use to get out of worse of the worst we have prooven it many times against you dont worry we have our probleums but when we fight with you than you will see our real toys wait yes we have all the probleums of entire world in pakistan but never count pakistan out because once we get out of these probleums you willl see different pakistan 100000 times better than your india we have worlds richest reserves which your entire india dosent have so give some respect
 
.
i think AIP subs with nukes is a better and cheaper option

Correction, that's the only option.

Now, see, I'm not starting a troll fest but Pakistan is simply not capable of building a nuclear submarine.
You may lease one, but a leased SSN/SSGN will come with many restrictions (even the Akula SSN used by
IN comes with many restrictions), and above all a nuke sub is simply too maintenance-heavy and
Pakistan's fragile economy (and the ever more fragile PN's share of the defence spending) can-not
sustain a nuke sub.

the indurance of a nucllear sub is 70-90 days while an AIp is 30-35 days
thats the main difference ..their are arguments that which one is quieter but both will switch to batteries when they are in danger spot..

And most N-subs today are capable of diving to greater depths than AIP/conventional subs. If you
dive deep enough (say, more than 500m), you can completely avoid Magnetic Anomaly Detector (MAD)
contact. Akula-II is capable of diving beyond 500 meters.

In all conditions, a conventional sub is ALWAYS quieter than a Nuclear one.
 
.
This is not a REALISTIC thread or option.

BUT we 29 pages of discussion for what ????
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom