Ali.009
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2008
- Messages
- 965
- Reaction score
- -6
------My upper portion is empty-------Mine too---
Both of you goons could not grasp my sarcasm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
------My upper portion is empty-------Mine too---
Inertial guidanceStick to the thread for more news.
Pakistan tested advanced Cruise Missile Babar-II. Missile can hit the targets at land and sea and have a range of 700 kilometers. This missile can work without the help of GPS.
CJCSC also witnessed the missile test.
on every top cruise missile list bramos on 1st what it is really on first in performance see in this top 5 cruise missile list
Is it possible that internal navigation sytems INS are as precise as GPS systems ?
Is a GPS chip already available that is working with all running systems ?
How many satellites do we need for global coverage ( at least 6 ?)
We can add to US GPS- Navstar ;
GLONASS – Russia's global navigation system. Fully operational worldwide.
Galileo – a global system being developed by the European Union and other partner countries, which began operation in 2016 (and is expected to be fully deployed by 2020)
Beidou – People's Republic of China's regional system, currently limited to Asia and the West Pacific,
global coverage planned to be operational by 2020
NAVIC – India's regional navigation system, covering India and Northern Indian Ocean
QZSS – Japanese regional system covering Asia and Oceania
Dude we tested a new SLCM today... Babur III
Yes TERCOM+INS+GPS +DSMAC (Digital Scene Matching and Area Co-relation) is there...Very impressive and my congratulations. I read about it. My question was related to guidance .
INS + GPS + Tercom ?
Is TERCOM integrated ? TERCOM is the most critical, so you can target without GPS .
But you need dedicated image processing computers on this missile .
New Recruit
we have SLCM its called babur 3we dont have submarines capable of firing SLBM or SLCM i hope the new chinese subs can give us that ability
Why dnt they increase long range missile?
are you sure?The current subs arent meant to fire the Babur at all
right after one month of babur testing PN did tested a slcmThank you. That's a very clear answer as to the status of SLCM in the PN.
Irrelevant, esp. when you take my (old) post oout of context.right after one month of babur testing PN did tested a slcm
Irrelevant, esp. when you take my (old) post oout of context.
Post 187, Dec 14, 2016
Oscar said:
The current subs arent meant to fire the Babur at all. Whiskey class launch systems were studied but were found to be thoroughly impractical(for the purpose) and very very noisy.
Penguin answered
Thank you. That's a very clear answer as to the status of SLCM in the PN.
For starters, one does not necessarily require an operation submarine to conduct an underwater launch. India, for example, tested its launch silo's for SLBMs using a pontoon submerged more than 30 metres deep in the sea. Testing could in principle also have involve a friendly navy's submarine (if the test was conducted 'out of area'). So, you can see that there are some steps/assumptions between an underwater launch test as a given and the conclusion that current PN boats have Babur. The earlier discussion, from which you took that old quote, was about the question whether currenntly operational PN boats (submarines) have a functional Babur capability. And the apparent answer was: no. Do not confuse testing with operational deployment. There's a lot in between.So then by which platform Pakistan tested the missile and whats the use of testing the missiles if it cannot be deployed in next 6 years at minimum ? Can you please provide but details...