What's new

Pakistan strike back hitlist

I would also destroy all the infrastructure in and around Baglihar dam, and any other dams planned to dry out Pakistan.

It will be a nice excuse.
 
. .
If we are to believe the media,the targets where a "training camp" near Muzaffarabad and the HQ of JuD near lahore.
Two planes where to make a "surgical strike" on both sites.

I think a reasonable response would be attacking the dam's in IHK that are stopping the water from coming into pakistan.
Send as many men and weapons that we can into kashmir and relight the LOC.

The response for the attack on Muridke should be "surgical strike" on the HQ of the BJP-RSS-Congress.
 
. . .
Targets can be better understood once we know the key Roles of our own armed forces…Generally speaking these are:-

Army: Protection of the state borders, limited offensive-defense….

Air Force: Defence of airspace, deny IAF achieving Air Superiority while occasionally creating favourable air situation for Pak Army

Navy: Securing sea lanes of communications (SLOCS), Protection of Karachi Complex…

Now targets in a war could be: Command and communication centres, industrial infrastructure, bridges of tactical and strategic importance, infantry concentrations, air bases, key oil facilities, ammo depots, electric grid centres, dams etc

While I will rule out the possibility of Nuclear devices, ICBMs can be used with conventional warhead at the targets at far ranges...These will also be used to carry out strikes at economic / political hubs ( Delhi / Mumbai etc ) and will be aimed to generate massive civilian casualties to demoralise enemy and saturate her resources…

War sucks BTW :tdown:
 
.
This is a very good topic. What would be the best targets to attack in India?

For India we know its Lahore primarily. Where should we hit?

If India attacks it will be a golden opportunity for Pakistan to solve the Kashmir problem in its favour by cutting off the Indian forces there and capturing rest of the Kashmir. That will be the most logical conclusion of the Battle of Kargil.
 
.
where does BAAL THAAKRAY live??? nd that PARNAAB MUKHERJI.... HOW can u guyz forget these two legendz ....:O
 
. .
If India attacks it will be a golden opportunity for Pakistan to solve the Kashmir problem in its favour by cutting off the Indian forces there and capturing rest of the Kashmir. That will be the most logical conclusion of the Battle of Kargil.
If conquering Kashmir was possible for either of us we would've done it decades ago.
 
.
Targets can be better understood once we know the key Roles of our own armed forces…Generally speaking these are:-

Army: Protection of the state borders, limited offensive-defense….

Air Force: Defence of airspace, deny IAF achieving Air Superiority while occasionally creating favourable air situation for Pak Army

Navy: Securing sea lanes of communications (SLOCS), Protection of Karachi Complex…

Now targets in a war could be: Command and communication centres, industrial infrastructure, bridges of tactical and strategic importance, infantry concentrations, air bases, key oil facilities, ammo depots, electric grid centres, dams etc

While I will rule out the possibility of Nuclear devices, ICBMs can be used with conventional warhead at the targets at far ranges...These will also be used to carry out strikes at economic / political hubs ( Delhi / Mumbai etc ) and will be aimed to generate massive civilian casualties to demoralise enemy and saturate her resources…

War sucks BTW :tdown:
This is not enough.

Till the enemy doesn't know it will also be attacked back, a fully defensive policy doesn't work.
 
. .
Pakistan does not have any ICBMs....stop dreaming
Our Ghauris, Shaheens can be used for indiscriminate bombing of all cities in India with conventional warhead

Of course Baburs can be used for precision hits around 750 km to the border

India is just dreaming if it thinks we cant hit them back and hit them hard.
 
.
A Pakistani response would be a tit for tat. Neither side wants to go overboard and escalate. Without quantifying what exactly it will be, its safe to say that it would be of a similar magnitude just so the other side knows that there is a cost associated with whatever they try.

Also nuclear sites are not subject to attack by either side. This is probably one area where both sides have an accord and will stick to in case of hostilities due to concerns with fall out etc.

Using BMs can be misconstrued by the other side.
 
Last edited:
.
if india impose war



my
secret answers to india.




hit back taj mahel indian parlement indian nukes sites thru heavy bombs over every major city to understand pablic of india its war.use SSG for sabutage like bombay last week.distroy more and more waipens storege sites same like 2002.target killing of indian leaders like advani sonya rahul bal thakry manmohen singh.blasts shuld be every were in india.try to kill more and more people.try to distroy major indian spots like lal kila metro train in bombay such like gate way of india.this war we must show whole india its a war not like before war on borders.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom