What's new

Pakistan Should Produce More Nuclear Weapons If No F16's

MastanKhan

PDF VETERAN
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
21,269
Reaction score
166
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Hi,

Let the U S stop the sale----. Pakistan must increase the production of nuclear weapons by at least a 100%.

So if the U S wants to cut off the conventional power base---no problem---let us increase the nuclear threshold---o_O.

The U S senators think that they got us by the ball joints---that is fine---let us increase the threshold---let us take the number of nuclear weapons to 500 at least---and let us start serious production of ICBM's---and other missile systems---:o:.

If the U S wants to play the game---that is fine----two can play it better---. Let us see who blinks first.
 
Last edited:
.
Hi,

Pakistan has been talking nicely to the U S----and the U S thinks that it has become god----that ain't so----:what:.

U S should remember that it could not push down pakistan even during the sanctions---pakistan has been trying to hide all the american follies during the afghan war ( and that was a big mistake )---but that should stop---:(.

Now is the time for confrontation----. The U S economy is extremely delicately perched---and major crisis can send it tumbling down the drain on more time---:coffee:.

And again I state---taking sides during Yemen crisis was extremely important---. The U S would have been in no position to force pakistan.
 
Last edited:
.
north-korea-meme-food-2.jpg


Anything else, Kim? Doing that only ensures India and the US become closer at Pakistan's expense.
 
.
Hi,

Pakistan has been talking nicely to the U S----and the U S thinks that it has become god----that ain't so----.

U S should remember that it could not push down pakistan even during the sanctions---pakistan has been trying to hide all the american follies during the afghan war ( and that was a big mistake )---but that should stop---.

Now is the time for confrontation----. The U S economy is extremely delicately perched---and major crisis can send it tumbling down the drain on more time---.

And again I state---taking sides during Yemen crisis was extremely important---. The U S would have been in no position to force pakistan.
Who knows, behavior like this by USA and West could open the gates for J20 in Pakistan and other Russian toys.
I am waiting for the day Pakistan anounces it will not buy anything defence related other than china and Russia.
 
.
mastaan saab, calm down.

The official justification of F16 was counter terrorism, now unless you want to nuke terrorists, there cannot be a parallel.

And why would US care if you had 100 or 1000 nukes, you can only deliver it to India. Pay the amount and get your jets, why do you want something you cant afford. You will have to pay one way or the other, if not with dollars then by subservience and allegiances, which in a long run is more expensive, as documented by the events that have taken place.

If anything ask Nawaz sherif to sell a few of his properties in London, and money shouldn't be an issue.
 
. .
Hi,

Let the U S stop the sale----. Pakistan must increase the production of nuclear weapons by at least a 1000%.

So if the U S wants to cut off the conventional power base---no problem---let us increase the nuclear threshold---.

The U S senators think that they got us by the ball joints---that is fine---let us increase the threshold---let us take the number of nuclear weapons to 500 at least---and let us start serious production of ICBM's---and other missile systems---.

If the U S wants to play the game---that is fine----two can play it better---. Let us see who blinks first.
You must have gone bonkers, how is nukes going to help pakistan? Creating them is easy and maintaining them is nightmare. ICBMs are also going to cost more , they need to be developed,tested and maintained. Unlike F16 which already have support base.

It will only lead from one ditch to another ditch.
 
. .
What we should do is just say good bye to f16 and go towards a Chinese platform and if not that than put that money in Jft. I don't understand this why we always expect someone else to pay for our things? Doing this imo can also result in economic sanctions. :)
 
.
more drones more ships in the sea more anti armor missiles more artillery. cannot completely rely on nukes.
 
.
That's true, if we won't have conventional weapons due to "Successful" Indian lobbying, we will need to cover the deficiency some other way and that will be nuclear weapons.
Same as North Korea who can't have conventional weapons and finds safety and security in nuclear weapons.
In this was India's "successful " diplomacy will back fire.
 
.
With more F16's---the conflict stays conventional---U S should have gladly given the F16----but then the U S senators / congressmen---some of them not the brightest starts in the galaxy---.

Once we have them---we will destroy you---you may destroy us totally---but the after effects---the economic meltdown---the U S will be a pauper state---you won't have a pot to pi-ss in---no more U S---but 50 different countries---.
Wheres the conventional part? both countries have nukes and pakistan talks about tactical nukes every now and then.

US has so much surveillance even if a cracker is burst in pakistan they will come to know about it. How in the world will US become a pauper state?:o: (even your higher than mountain frnd china also cannot think about it) They will simply print more dollars and move ahead.

Did you probably have any beef from Mad cow for lnch :p:.
 
.
Wheres the conventional part? both countries have nukes and pakistan talks about tactical nukes every now and then.

US has so much surveillance even if a cracker is burst in pakistan they will come to know about it. How in the world will US become a pauper state?:o: (even your higher than mountain frnd china also cannot think about it) They will simply print more dollars and move ahead.

Did you probably have any beef from Mad cow for lnch :p:.
US has as much surveillance in Pakistan as we let them think they have.
For example this missile was left out in the open for satellites to see.
Cgqle1OVEAE46Sw.jpg
 
. .
Chill out uncle jee.

Pakistan is supposed to front $270 million to the acquisition, the money comes from all 3 of Pakistan's branches Navy, AF, Army. ~$90 million from each.

Why not press the money into the JF-17? There are plenty of projects that could use the money.

Civil Projects: Gwadar, Hydro-electric, Schools, Suparco <-- that would piss them off greatly, a satellite launch from Pakistan.

Military: Drones, JF-17, Helicopters.

And $1 million to my account for my great suggestion.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom