Pakistan should fulfill its part of UN resolutions before pointing fingers at India

[Thomas M]

People hate india in IOK whereas Pakistan have people's support in Azad Kashmir.

Since you say that people are supposed to believe ??

Something you guys had in Junagadh Manvadar and Hyderabad Deccan when those states announced merger with Pakistan but India occupied them claiming that people were against that decision.[/QUOTE]

I

What about Junagardh invasion? Which was a pakistani territory and you forcefully annexed ? And about Hyderabad state too ?

Get some correct facts dude, Hydrabad never wanted to join neither Pakistan or India. In November 1947, the Government of India signed a stand still agreement with the Nizam, hoping that while the negotiations proceeded, Nizam would allow to introduce some representative government in the state, making the task of merger easier. But, the Nizam had other plans. He hired leading British lawyer Sir Walter Monckton, a friend of Mountbatten, to negotiate with the Government of India. The Nizam was actually trying to prolong negotiations and in the meanwhile build up his military strength and force India to accept his sovereignty. In the meantime his militia, the Razakar's started to harass the minority population especially hindus in and around Hyderabad state and killing them which give India a solid reason to move her troops.


But when you talk about Junagadh and Hydrabad, please do mention about "Khanate of Kalat" as well what happened to that and where is it now ???.

Just like BABA AGORI quoted above, "humara kuttta kutta, tumhara kutta Tommy ...."

Height of Hypocrisy.
Will India out from kashmir if Pakistan pulls out ? Answer that and we will wind up our debate without any troll fest

 

[waz]

It would be nice if people actually looked for similar threads before posting. Thread closed.