Exactly!!Al-khalid 2 is under development VT-4 is not it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly!!Al-khalid 2 is under development VT-4 is not it.
Not SAM but drones will eventually replace pilots.If so, fighter and bomber have to be given up, due to the development of SAM.
It can be the same to the tanks in the future.Not SAM but drones will eventually replace pilots.
Firepower, motility and protection are three main functions of tank. Do you think IFV and other vehicles can play that role?And you didnt answer my question on role of tanks in 21st century warfare ?
I think PA should get licence to build them.PA will induct at least 100 VT4 from China.
yes, that's what they are doing. and certian TOT might be included.I think PA should get licence to build them.
VT-4 has MBT-90 DNA.....thats a very good thing......yes, that's what they are doing. and certian TOT might be included.
Why do you think so?VT-4 has MBT-90 DNA.....thats a very good thing......
brother, its T99A2.VT-4 has MBT-90 DNA.....thats a very good thing......
A good thing developed from it which with more accuracy and fast.....Why do you think so?
No, mbt 90brother, its T99A2.
Can you tell me what they share in common?A good thing developed from it which with more accuracy and fast.....
No, mbt 90
Is there is any thing common btw F-16 and JF-17 ....no......but jft actually built on the basis of the fighting falcon.Can you tell me what they share in common?
Do you mean "mbt 90" is better than VT-4, or what can VT-4 learn from "mbt 90"?Is there is any thing common btw F-16 and JF-17 ....no......but jft actually built on the basis of the fighting falcon.