‘Pakistan schools teach Hindu hatred’

[majesticpankaj]

@bilal -- don't do blah blah blah... There is no case running against Modi in India. less than 5000 sikhs killed during 1984 and only 2000 muslims during gujrat. But millions of bengalis were butered by pakistani army in bangladesh in 1971. Even Karchi is not safe for people.

And listen to your leader Altaf hussain who was pleading India to take them back.

 

[Sliver]

i am yet to get a confirmation from pakistani posters. does the report have any truth in it? if not, can you give me exceprts from your textbooks that show people from other religions in good light?

 

[Nelson]

There is less violence against minorities in Pakistan than what minorities in India have to face.

Newton's law. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. There's no reaction from minorities in Pakistan, so no riots. If Muslims start a violence then they'll get the reaction which will lead to more violence.

I'm just trying to tell you the ground realities, not trying to insult or defame any state or religion.

 

[53fd]

@bilal -- don't do blah blah blah... There is no case running against Modi in India. less than 5000 sikhs killed during 1984 and only 2000 muslims during gujrat. But millions of bengalis were butered by pakistani army in bangladesh in 1971. Even Karchi is not safe for people.

And listen to your leader Altaf hussain who was pleading India to take them back.

You are mixing ethnic violence with violence against religious minorities. In Pakistan, while there is ethnic violence, there is little violence against religious minorities. In India, both are found in huge abundance. The Supreme Court's SIT has already indicted Modi for his crimes in Gujarat.

 

[nalandapride]

When a CM who was indicted by the Supreme Court's SIT for the killing of 2000 Gujarati Muslims got reelected two more times as CM, & is having a bid to become the PM; just goes to show your nation's mentality towards minorities. When the killers of 20,000-50,000 Sikhs are not brought to justice goes to show that as well. About 90% of the victims of the Blasphemy Law have been Muslims, it has nothing to do with minorities.

Because your Blasphemy laws has flaws, Barelvis used it against Deobandi and vice versa. Muslims used against Hindus, Christians and Ahmedis and list goes on, Shia against Sunnis and vice versa. Forget Modi, it is a court case but tell me every media house has their protocol, how come anyone use racial slur "Hindu Banya" on mainstream Pakistani news channel when they can't run obscene material. Recently there was vast recruitment going on in Pakistan for Sunnis to crush Shias in Bahrain.

 

[Rusty]

For rights, I belong to minority in India but still I can become a President or PM which is not possible in Pakistan.

Okay fair enough, but you have to acknowledged that they can become a MP or do anything else. The only job a non Muslim cannot do is lead an ISLAMIC Republic.
pretty logical if you ask me, considering that in the States you cannot even become the president if you were born outside the country.

 

[Sliver]

You are mixing ethnic violence with violence against religious minorities. In Pakistan, while there is ethnic violence, there is little violence against religious minorities. In India, both are found in huge abundance. The Supreme Court's SIT has already indicted Modi for his crimes in Gujarat.

you should have a good amount of minorities in the first place for that to happen. 1% Hindus and 2% Christians hardly qualifies. in fact being from the same religion still having ethnic violence is even worse. you have a unifying factor but still its not strong enough to cover the divisive force of ethnic differences.

 

[mjnaushad]

Because your Blasphemy laws has flaws, Barelvis used it against Deobandi and vice versa. Muslims used against Hindus, Christians and Ahmedis and list goes on, Shia against Sunnis and vice versa. Forget Modi, it is a court case but tell me every media house has their protocol, how come anyone use racial slur "Hindu Banya" on mainstream Pakistani news channel when they can't run obscene material. Recently there was vast recruitment going on in Pakistan for Sunnis to crush Shias in Bahrain.

When you can compare us to terrorists, Dogs, Snakes, and whatnot....... Why not Hindu Banya?? In every Indian channel when you need to show Pakistanis or Muslims they'll be like big beards, that arabic type cloth on their shoulders and an evil mentality....


Plus Recruitement for Behrain.... why shouldn't I do a job when they are offering good pakage.... Those all men were RETIRED soldiers...... So your logic fails....And how can you say they only recruited sunnis....???

 

[53fd]

Because your Blasphemy laws has flaws, Barelvis used it against Deobandi and vice versa. Muslims used against Hindus, Christians and Ahmedis and list goes on, Shia against Sunnis and vice versa. Forget Modi, it is a court case but tell me every media house has their protocol, how come anyone use racial slur "Hindu Banya" on mainstream Pakistani news channel when they can't run obscene material.

Again, one example of "Hindu Banya" does not prove there is hatred for Hindus in Pakistan.

 

[Nelson]

Okay fair enough, but you have to acknowledged that they can become a MP or do anything else. The only job a non Muslim cannot do is lead an ISLAMIC Republic.
pretty logical if you ask me, considering that in the States you cannot even become the president if you were born outside the country.

I know that Rusty. I'm just trying to tell you that there is no difference of rights in India irrespective of religion. Don't you appreciate that?

 

[nalandapride]

Okay fair enough, but you have to acknowledged that they can become a MP or do anything else. The only job a non Muslim cannot do is lead an ISLAMIC Republic.
pretty logical if you ask me, considering that in the States you cannot even become the president if you were born outside the country.

What is this Islamic Republic, a man made institution, you could have a secular framework like Turkey has. Secularism is guarantee for equality but in Pakistan whoever demands a secular state is considered as traitor.

 

[majesticpankaj]

Pakistan has Intitutionalised the hatred against minorities by introducing such a bias curriculum. Blasphemy law is the cherry on the cake.

 

[nalandapride]

Again, one example of "Hindu Banya" does not prove there is hatred for Hindus in Pakistan.

Ha Ha Ha... Denial at its best and best tool of Pakistanis.

 

[Rusty]

What is this Islamic Republic, a man made institution, you could have a secular framework like Turkey has. Secularism is guarantee for equality but in Pakistan whoever demands a secular state is considered as traitor.

What is the difference between a secular state and an Islamic republic? can you tell me?

The reality is that in a secular state the Muslims loose their rights, in an Islamic republic everyone has rights.
Look at Turkey, the prime minister's wife cannot run for office because she wears a hijab. Women are not allowed to be educated if they are practicing Muslims. A man with a beard has a hard time getting work.
No thanks, we don't want that kind of discrimination.

But since it's discrimination against Muslims, it must not count right

 

[Nelson]

What is the difference between a secular state and an Islamic republic? can you tell me?

In Islamic republic, non Muslims are not treated equal where as in secular state, everyone is equal. I can't believe you asked that.

The reality is that in a secular state the Muslims loose their rights,

You're wrong.

in an Islamic republic everyone has rights.

How so? I just told you that a person belong to a minority can't become a President or PM in Islamic republic. So you're wrong again.