Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal to overtake India’s: SIPRI

[Dark Angel]

the diffrence is very clear if ur pak govt has adequate knowledge in reactor feild and is still not taking steps to improve conditions in pakistan its sad as i read in other threads that pakistan is dealing with heavy power cuts ....its just sad to see such hunger for weapons

 

[!!craft!!]

Yeah answer is simple, india produce electricity with her plants and pakistan produce plutonium grade nuclear weapons!

And you are proud of it aint you???? country developing in nuclear capabilities on the cost of people suffering ... you guys are pretty good at this since you first announce the development of thermon nuclear bomb in the late 70

 

[mr_cool]

Read the article header and the various lists of nuclear warheads by country charts.
Combine it with the statements of members claiming that we have more than India
Add it up with the comparison of nuclear energy produced and the weapons ratio.



and Bingo!!!!

you have a proof!!!!!!

So, it seems like the definition of PROOF in your books constitutes to reading articles and combining it with statements...
Wow that explains how you guys are able to blame everything on pakistan in any negative situation AND are able to claim you have CREDIBLE PROOF...
basically, write afew articles and combine it with afew statements against pakistan...and bang there is your credible 'proof' that pakistan/ISI has a hand in everything negative that occurs right?!!!

I always wondered why india never provides actual proof yet it always claims to have 'proof' of pakistan's involvement in anything and evetrything!!

 

[deckingraj]

Do you know how many nukes we have? Do you know how many does Pakistan, China have? Or how many US, Russia, France, UK have? Now why should India have smallest among these?

If our small number of nukes can be taken care by the enemies than whats is the point of having nuke at all when we can't have a credible deterrence?

If you talk about tax payers money than GoI wastes more in many other cases than defence, even some years MoD can't spend all the money allocated!!!

I am sorry Kinetic but i disagree...I in fact agree with peacemaker here...What is more important is an effective and capable delivery system...Focus should be on that....If we have a credible triad then 60-70 will sound like 200.... In fact if my enemy knows that they can wipe out a good percentage of my nuclear arsenal then they would tend to overhaul me with nukes...However if they know that i have credible delivery system and there is no way they can cause significant damage to my delivery system then they will not dare to nuke me....Answer is simple...Have a capable TRIAD...Keep working on BMD and keep growing....If you achieve that you have simply killed the enemy without firing a single bullet...

Having said it we should ensure that numbers disparity(if at all) is not huge...Looking at our capacity to produce nukes i am confident strategist will take care of that....

 

[Hasnain2009]

And you are proud of it aint you???? country developing in nuclear capabilities on the cost of people suffering ... you guys are pretty good at this since you first announce the development of thermon nuclear bomb in the late 70

Yes we are proud of it, bcoz if we didnt had nukes then combo of INDIA + ISRAEL + USA would be ruling pakistani's, so we developed 10-30 nukes first so that India + Israel will not attack on us, now we are making more sophisticated and compact warheads so that we can use them for long range deliveries, u dont need to worry bcoz 30-50 will be enough to wipe out india(in case of indian agression and pak army's request to press n-button) so we are not making nukes for india, we have others threats also...thats why our nuclear scientists says that we dont compare our nuclear program with india, we compare it with west!

 

[!!craft!!]

So, it seems like the definition of PROOF in your books constitutes to reading articles and combining it with statements...
Wow that explains how you guys are able to blame everything on pakistan in any negative situation AND are able to claim you have CREDIBLE PROOF...
basically, write afew articles and combine it with afew statements against pakistan...and bang there is your credible 'proof' that pakistan/ISI has a hand in everything negative that occurs right?!!!

I always wondered why india never provides actual proof yet it always claims to have 'proof' of pakistan's involvement in anything and evetrything!!

this is a forum what other way do expect him to provide you proof??? well to be precise proof is a wrong word reference is the correct word..you need proof ...go watch zaid hamid video youll get plenty of it ,which will be in your prespective too..period

 

[T-Faz]

Nuclear Warheads (Source: SIPRI)

Russia: 12,000
US: 9,600
France: 300
UK: 225
China: 240
Pakistan: 70-90
Israel: 80
India: 60-80

 

[Indian_Idol]

to members of both India and Pakistan
if you people feel proud of having huge number of nukes, then you literally you accept that you are inferior to the enemy in every aspect and nukes are the only hope for your survival.also you were degrading the courage,dedication and responsibility of those brave soldiers who were guarding us 24x7 who left their families behind... so please don't insult the soldiers for your fun fantasies.

 

[!!craft!!]

Yes we are proud of it, bcoz if we didnt had nukes then combo of INDIA + ISRAEL + USA would be ruling pakistani's, so we developed 10-30 nukes first so that India + Israel will not attack on us, now we are making more sophisticated and compact warheads so that we can use them for long range deliveries, u dont need to worry bcoz 30-50 will be enough to wipe out india(in case of indian agression and pak army's request to press n-button) so we are not making nukes for india, we have others threats also...thats why our nuclear scientists says that we dont compare our nuclear program with india, we compare it with west![/q

boy oh boy...i am scared...you from zaid hamed fan club???

 

[Dark Angel]

Read it.. a single nuclear reactor called tarapur alone produces 490 MWs.



Nuclear power in India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Nuclear Power in India | Indian Nuclear Energy




I guess u understand the meaning of "average".

Forget that dude 490 MW is nothing compared to what we have archived


Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant

The capacity of each reactor will be 1000 MW or 1 GW, the new reactors will bring total capacity of the power plant to 9200 MW or 9.2 GW.

 

[Indian_Idol]

Yes we are proud of it, bcoz if we didnt had nukes then combo of INDIA + ISRAEL + USA would be ruling pakistani's, so we developed 10-30 nukes first so that India + Israel will not attack on us, now we are making more sophisticated and compact warheads so that we can use them for long range deliveries, u dont need to worry bcoz 30-50 will be enough to wipe out india(in case of indian agression and pak army's request to press n-button) so we are not making nukes for india, we have others threats also...thats why our nuclear scientists says that we dont compare our nuclear program with india, we compare it with west!

now you people were in race with US and EU??? good luck.. tats all i can say...

 

[mr_cool]

this is a forum what other way do expect him to provide you proof??? well to be precise proof is a wrong word reference is the correct word..you need proof ...go watch zaid hamid video youll get plenty of it ,which will be in your prespective too..period

Firstly, dont lecture me what the correct term is....it is your compatriot you need to mention that too as he is the one who was describing his genious methods of providing 'proof' - not me!!

Secondly, why are u keep mentioning zaid hamid...who the hell is he and what the hell has he got to do with this???

Finally, what the hell does the following mean..."which will be in your prespective too..period"??!! This doesnt even make any sense!
do you always just blurt out whatever comes in your head regardless of it has any relevance or if it makes any sense or not!!!??
Gee, why am i even bothering...

 

[hal-fgfa]

not only 1000 MW india working on 1650 MW projects in Jaitapur Maharashtra with total capacity of 9900 MW in 6 reactors ... and that can be reached to 10

 

[!!craft!!]

Firstly, dont lecture me what the correct term is....it is your compatriot you need to mention that too as he is the one who was describing his genious methods of providing 'proof' - not me!!

Secondly, why are u keep mentioning zaid hamid...who the hell is he and what the hell has he got to do with this???

Finally, what the hell does the following mean..."which will be in your prespective too..period"??!! This doesnt even make any sense!
do you always just blurt out whatever comes in your head regardless of it has any relevance or if it makes any sense or not!!!??
Gee, why am i even bothering...

well i guess i aint the one who is blurting out ??? the meaning of perspective is ones point of view... and if you dont know this you gotta go to kindergarden

 

[Vasily Zaytsev]

Does anybody have any idea about how much tritium India produces and what is done with it?