What's new

Pakistan registers a million new taxpayers ahead of IMF review

AZADPAKISTAN2009

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
37,669
Reaction score
68
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
https%3A%2F%2Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%2Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%2Fimages%2F7%2F0%2F8%2F5%2F22745807-3-eng-GB%2FCropped-15694737471190823.jpg

Pakistan registers a million new taxpayers ahead of IMF review

https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Pakistan-registers-a-million-new-taxpayers-ahead-of-IMF-review

ISLAMABAD -- Pakistani tax officials have a million reasons to smile.

For the first time, they have registered one million new taxpayers over the course of a year, putting at least 2.5 million Pakistanis on the tax roll.

"This is no small success. We went aggressively after people who never declared their incomes and forced them to sign up as regular taxpayers," said one senior official of the Federal Board of Revenue, who spoke to the Nikkei Asian Review on condition of anonymity. "If we can keep up the momentum, Pakistan's tax collections will improve in time."


The news comes ahead of the International Monetary Fund's first review of the country's economic progress in October under a three-year $6 billion loan package approved in July. And it may help Pakistan begin to shed its image as a land of rampant tax evasion, where less than 1% were registered as taxpayers before the release of the latest figures.

Ernesto Ramirez Rigo, head of the IMF team responsible for monitoring the country's economic progress, said in a statement earlier this month that there has been "significant improvement in tax revenue collections with taxes showing double-digit growth." Rigo noted that "the FBR is undertaking significant steps to improve tax administration and its interface with taxpayers."

Still, despite increased tax collections, the country's sluggish economy may make the good cheer short-lived. The IMF expects Pakistan's growth rate to hit about 2.4% in the financial year to June 2020 -- about half the rate achieved between 2005 and 2015. The slowdown will likely continue due to tight controls on government spending that the IMF demands in order to reduce the fiscal deficit.

"The IMF program will cause a slowdown of Pakistan's economy. The result is going to make it harder for the government here to raise tax collections in ways like collections on customs duty," said one Islamabad-based economist, who also spoke on condition of anonymity. "Imports are already shrinking so customs duty collection is going to be lower."

Critics warn that a 10% fall in targeted tax collections in July and August could endanger the IMF deal. Consistently failing to meet targets would result in the IMF losing faith and modifying -- or dropping altogether -- the loan before the end of the program.

"Pakistan has historically faced a fiscal problem and that problem hasn't gone away," Sakib Sherani, a former adviser to the finance ministry, told Nikkei. "For the IMF program, achieving the [tax targets] will be very important," he added.

One issue that has plagued successive governments is a long-standing policy that exempts the agriculture sector from taxes.

Politically influential owners of large farmlands have routinely resisted attempts by governments to force them to pay income tax. Senior tax officials told Nikkei that many businesspeople and industrialists purchase farmland to reduce their tax exposure.

One cabinet minister told Nikkei that around 60% of parliament comprises members whose constituents depend on agriculture for their main source of income. "This [resistance on taxing the agricultural sector] is the only area where politicians from different parties -- whether in government or the opposition -- find common cause," he said.

Business leaders are also concerned about the aggressive tax collection policies, warning that business confidence has plunged due to Khan's anti-corruption campaign, which includes ferreting out tax dodgers. Since being elected prime minister in 2018, Khan has thrown his support behind the National Accountability Bureau, a government watchdog that is hounding opposition leaders, government officials and businesspersons suspected of malfeasance.

"Until these [bandits] and plunderers who have brought the country to the brink of bankruptcy and burdened it with debts are sent to jail, the country can't progress," Khan said in a July speech to his ruling Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf political party.

One business leader in Karachi, the country's main economic hub, told Nikkei that the NAB has spooked the business community. "Pakistani businessmen are scared of making large investments in the country," he said, explaining that weak business confidence has hindered growth possibly resulting in less future tax revenue.

He concluded that even if more people joined the tax rolls, the IMF's tax targets would not be met. "Pakistan's economy is just not going to move quickly enough," he said.
 
. . .
One way to get everyone to register as a tax payer would be for the FBR to introduce 50% deduction for incoming transactions / average balance per month of non-filers. A bit orwellian but hamari qom isi qabil hai.
 
.
just 1 million in a pop of 220 million wtf? how can any country provide decent services if there is insufficient fairness in tax rates and collection. Pakistan can be a low tax country but all people need to be paying their fair share into the system. The current status quo is not sustainable. Imagine the state of the country if the nation had been collecting taxes properly since birth. The loss to the exchequer runs into hundreds of billions. Furthermore, we need to apply pressure on the rich nations to stop the laundering of looted money into their banking and business systems. And should make it easier to trace and repatriate the looted/laundered wealth. We need FATF on these countries too.
 
.
just 1 million in a pop of 220 million wtf? how can any country provide decent services if there is insufficient fairness in tax rates and collection. Pakistan can be a low tax country but all people need to be paying their fair share into the system. The current status quo is not sustainable. Imagine the state of the country if the nation had been collecting taxes properly since birth. The loss to the exchequer runs into hundreds of billions. Furthermore, we need to apply pressure on the rich nations to stop the laundering of looted money into their banking and business systems. And should make it easier to trace and repatriate the looted/laundered wealth. We need FATF on these countries too.
To be fair it's 2.5% and it's only for income tax. Tens of millions are paying indirect taxes every day.
 
. . .
@ps3linux my very dear Pak,

Do you agree that a standardised flat tax is perhaps the key to solve taxation problems sans import duties..which must be prohibitive...

Today the poorest of the poort are indirectly taxed... which I consider a crime really.

A direct flat tax on 40% population and we can raise 10+TrillionPKR ..also cut FBR to size... disband it I say...

Sir there is silver lining when I look at some aspects but when it comes to financial discipline and documentation I am not very hopeful, just today was discussing with a private limited company that their liability on interest income is 29% in accordance with their corporate tax rate, but they were insisting that it is 15% final as deducted by the bank.

Then it flashed in my mind and I asked them whether they are in profit or loss operationally, although they didn't know but forwarded me their audited accounts for last three year done by a C.A firm, I am still unable to comprehend the amount of financial corruption in our country. A large Ghee/oil producing/marketing company which is in operational losses since forever, but has about 2 billion surplus money. Barely breaks even, offsets operational losses through adjustment of interest income - tax liability thus saving Rs.280 million in taxes. F*** me.

Sir while your suggestion is valid and practical, problem is real income assessment and tax on that basis, from above example you'd understand even then few will be scr**ed and the real big fish will be spared.

Someday will share the story of sugar mafia, how they evade taxes.
 
.
i don't know - surely it depends on if doctors pay their tax? I don't think it's enough - i think the figure should be much much higher.
They earn a shit load of money and pay a fraction of tax from the government pay while Govt. is unaware of their private practices.
 
.
just 1 million in a pop of 220 million wtf? how can any country provide decent services if there is insufficient fairness in tax rates and collection. Pakistan can be a low tax country but all people need to be paying their fair share into the system. The current status quo is not sustainable. Imagine the state of the country if the nation had been collecting taxes properly since birth. The loss to the exchequer runs into hundreds of billions. Furthermore, we need to apply pressure on the rich nations to stop the laundering of looted money into their banking and business systems. And should make it easier to trace and repatriate the looted/laundered wealth. We need FATF on these countries too.

Bhai off the 220 million roughly 60% aren't even old enough to work. So that leaves 88 million, then lets say about 70% of those earn less than the income required to file taxes. This leaves about 26 million. Then in our society women are generally discouraged from working, and women constitute about 50% of population, so off that 26 million, about 13 million will be women and we can safely assume that 10 million won't be working. So this leaves a total of 13 + 3 = 16 million people who are earning enough income to be eligible to pay direct income tax. Off those 2.5 million are registered. This is a small number and needs to be increased but max ceiling is at 10-15 million and not 220 million.

Now these numbers are not backed by hard statistics from Bureau of Statistics or FBR, but they are my own calc based on whatever I know about Pakistani economy and demographics.

Hope this helps.
 
.
2.5 Million people paying income tax for a country of 220 Million people is ridiculously poor. I know we are a poor nation but we should have atleast 50 Million people paying regular taxes. Doctors, Nurses, teachers, government employees etc. Pakistan should be a low tax paying nation as we are not developed like the western nations.

Also it's easy to target the working class and middle class. How about targeting the Industrialist, the millionaire politicians, the businessmen, the ex army guys, bureaucrats. We all know this is not happenings. The ruling elite should be the first people paying taxes.

However I believe it will be difficult to get the Pakistani public to pay taxes. We need to bring in new methods for taxation.

Why not bring in a new Tax authority with fully trained people and add any new people on that authority, then see how that is working and then slowly add the old tax payers on the new authority.

Why not tax the goods before they leave the industry for the businessmen, plus you can check how many goods they purchase etc.
Introduce shop permits.
 
.
just 1 million in a pop of 220 million wtf? how can any country provide decent services if there is insufficient fairness in tax rates and collection. Pakistan can be a low tax country but all people need to be paying their fair share into the system. The current status quo is not sustainable. Imagine the state of the country if the nation had been collecting taxes properly since birth. The loss to the exchequer runs into hundreds of billions. Furthermore, we need to apply pressure on the rich nations to stop the laundering of looted money into their banking and business systems. And should make it easier to trace and repatriate the looted/laundered wealth. We need FATF on these countries too.
Brother peoples who already paying tax just bring into tax net for file annually paid tax details if you thinks tax will increase by this on rapid pace then it is not possible. Taxs already coming into treasury but without giving individual details. And such practice only full fill the documentations stomach nor treasury. Regards
 
.
15 Million Tax payer is a great target
we really should collect tax from 75 million
 
.
https%3A%2F%2Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%2Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%2Fimages%2F7%2F0%2F8%2F5%2F22745807-3-eng-GB%2FCropped-15694737471190823.jpg

Pakistan registers a million new taxpayers ahead of IMF review

https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Pakistan-registers-a-million-new-taxpayers-ahead-of-IMF-review

ISLAMABAD -- Pakistani tax officials have a million reasons to smile.

For the first time, they have registered one million new taxpayers over the course of a year, putting at least 2.5 million Pakistanis on the tax roll.

"This is no small success. We went aggressively after people who never declared their incomes and forced them to sign up as regular taxpayers," said one senior official of the Federal Board of Revenue, who spoke to the Nikkei Asian Review on condition of anonymity. "If we can keep up the momentum, Pakistan's tax collections will improve in time."


The news comes ahead of the International Monetary Fund's first review of the country's economic progress in October under a three-year $6 billion loan package approved in July. And it may help Pakistan begin to shed its image as a land of rampant tax evasion, where less than 1% were registered as taxpayers before the release of the latest figures.

Ernesto Ramirez Rigo, head of the IMF team responsible for monitoring the country's economic progress, said in a statement earlier this month that there has been "significant improvement in tax revenue collections with taxes showing double-digit growth." Rigo noted that "the FBR is undertaking significant steps to improve tax administration and its interface with taxpayers."

Still, despite increased tax collections, the country's sluggish economy may make the good cheer short-lived. The IMF expects Pakistan's growth rate to hit about 2.4% in the financial year to June 2020 -- about half the rate achieved between 2005 and 2015. The slowdown will likely continue due to tight controls on government spending that the IMF demands in order to reduce the fiscal deficit.

"The IMF program will cause a slowdown of Pakistan's economy. The result is going to make it harder for the government here to raise tax collections in ways like collections on customs duty," said one Islamabad-based economist, who also spoke on condition of anonymity. "Imports are already shrinking so customs duty collection is going to be lower."

Critics warn that a 10% fall in targeted tax collections in July and August could endanger the IMF deal. Consistently failing to meet targets would result in the IMF losing faith and modifying -- or dropping altogether -- the loan before the end of the program.

"Pakistan has historically faced a fiscal problem and that problem hasn't gone away," Sakib Sherani, a former adviser to the finance ministry, told Nikkei. "For the IMF program, achieving the [tax targets] will be very important," he added.

One issue that has plagued successive governments is a long-standing policy that exempts the agriculture sector from taxes.

Politically influential owners of large farmlands have routinely resisted attempts by governments to force them to pay income tax. Senior tax officials told Nikkei that many businesspeople and industrialists purchase farmland to reduce their tax exposure.

One cabinet minister told Nikkei that around 60% of parliament comprises members whose constituents depend on agriculture for their main source of income. "This [resistance on taxing the agricultural sector] is the only area where politicians from different parties -- whether in government or the opposition -- find common cause," he said.

Business leaders are also concerned about the aggressive tax collection policies, warning that business confidence has plunged due to Khan's anti-corruption campaign, which includes ferreting out tax dodgers. Since being elected prime minister in 2018, Khan has thrown his support behind the National Accountability Bureau, a government watchdog that is hounding opposition leaders, government officials and businesspersons suspected of malfeasance.

"Until these [bandits] and plunderers who have brought the country to the brink of bankruptcy and burdened it with debts are sent to jail, the country can't progress," Khan said in a July speech to his ruling Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf political party.

One business leader in Karachi, the country's main economic hub, told Nikkei that the NAB has spooked the business community. "Pakistani businessmen are scared of making large investments in the country," he said, explaining that weak business confidence has hindered growth possibly resulting in less future tax revenue.

He concluded that even if more people joined the tax rolls, the IMF's tax targets would not be met. "Pakistan's economy is just not going to move quickly enough," he said.
Nothing specific or special. Not clear cut..

Making people to file for income tax is different from making them pay..

https://www.google.com/amp/s/tribun...adjustments-meet-annual-revenue-target/?amp=1
Pls go through the link

Share of income tax is reduced while indirect taxation was increased...

Don't get carried away easily.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom