Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pak weapons export is in trillions of USD
Aircraft Manufacturing Factory at Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC). Photo credit: PAC.
Aug 1, 2016 Bilal Khan -
PAKISTAN REDUCED DEFENCE IMPORTS BY 90%
At a seminar organized by the Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad (ISSI), Rana Tanveer Hussain, Pakistan’s Minister of Defence Production (and Minister of Science and Technology), said that Pakistan had reduced its defence imports by 90% over the past three years (Business Recorder).
Emphasizing the need to source domestically, Hussain told seminar participants that his ministry reduced the number of federally issued ‘no-objection certificates’ (NOC) for imported goods from 1000 to 100.
The minister also called for an increase in the domestic research and development budget – currently at 0.29% of Pakistan’s gross domestic product (GDP) to at least one percent of the country’s GDP by 2018.
Comment and Analysis
Domestic production of defence hardware offers a number of important advantages. First, it provides a country with the strategic benefit of reducing its dependence on foreign suppliers. In times of war, this can be critical, especially if a country – such as Pakistan – is susceptible to military sanctions. In fact, this was the primary objective behind Pakistan’s pursuit of self-reliance.
Second, this reduced overseas dependence enables a country to channel a higher proportion of its precious national funding into its domestic industries. Besides supporting the local economy, domestic defence production also provides cost-savings. For example, by sourcing locally, Pakistan does not need to spend in dollars, pounds or euros, but rather, the Pakistani rupee, and that too with lower labour and material costs. In tandem with reduced costs, defence spending can become a form of stimulus, i.e. the use of public money as a means to stimulate local economic activity.
However, it is important to note that there a number of major caveats in the federal minister’s statement. For example, over the past three years, Pakistan has not procured much in the way of next-generation or particularly advanced hardware. This will change in the next three years, especially as programs such as the Pakistan Air Force (PAF)’s JF-17 Block-III and the Pakistan Navy (PN)’s next-generation submarines take shape. New and advanced hardware, such as active electronically-scanned array (AESA) radars or air-independent propulsion (AIP) systems, are also the most expensive, and Pakistan is certain to import both.
One can only save so much from local licensed production and manufacturing of basic components, especially in the long-term. In order to accrue decisive savings, Pakistan must invest in its capacity to develop and manufacture advanced components domestically. One cannot defer this to off-the-shelf purchases and partnerships, for both are bound to the seller’s interests, which will not always be flexible.
For example, not every company will have an interest in parting with sensitive technology, and even if one is able to procure that technology, they will have only do so after spending a significant amount on it. Such purchases can only be justified on the basis of scale, i.e. the need to produce a large number of systems as a means to distribute the cost of acquiring the technology and facilities to produce them. This is much easier to do with an assault or battle rifle than it is with a complete fighter aircraft (i.e. airframe, engine, radar and avionics together).
Countries will not readily part with valuable expertise and sensitive technology, but Pakistan could try and secure softer gains in the form of general capacity building such as technology/engineering universities, research and development facilities (e.g. wind tunnels) and collaborating in fields such as radar and electronic warfare development. It will be several decades before such initiatives come to fruition in significant ways, but gains in each of these areas will enable Pakistan to continuously grow in its ability to produce complex systems.
Domestic production of missile radomes and dual-pulse rockets for air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles, transceiver modules for AESA radars and electronic warfare/countermeasures equipment, diesel engines for armoured vehicles, and advanced metallurgy and composites are the kinds of areas that will result in massive long-term costs savings and decline in overseas dependence. However, Pakistan will require a significant level of investment in its underlying science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) development in order to begin charting measurable gains in these fields.
Source: QUWA.org
Good one man .Pak weapons export is in trillions of USD
Exporting to more then 50 countries including USA UK Germany on top ..
Unless you are trying to remind us that we had better watch out.
Dont you think its the other way round. On topic there is hardly anything alarming about our defense industry considering its size and the meagre resources that we put into it.
sahi kaha apny bilkul
That's true, if we get our act together, we can push the Chinese, the basic talent is there.
Please, please don't take this as jingoism - I hope you will accept that I do not do jingoism - but as a serious assessment. The things I've seen Indian engineers do on the Tejas, on the ALH, where Ashok Baweja was directly responsible for the resounding success of the programme, on the Arjuna, on simulator work, on absorbing the glass cockpit technology, and on the PSLV mission computer programming is truly class work. All of BEL, for instance, is a class shop. ISRO in general, apart from these occasional very peculiar fits of self-hatred that overtake it from time to time, is world class.
The trouble is we kill ourselves with our bureaucracy and our infighting. And there are pockets of darkness which need a neutron bomb.
What I like about the Pakistani programme, on the other hand, is that somebody is taking balanced decisions all the time. My assessment is that somebody has figured out (@MastanKhan will not agree, and I say this in fear, quaking and trembling in my boots, and soiling my dhoti) what can and cannot be paid for, and has taken some really great decisions. These decisions have led to your getting product out of the door; not necessarily the smooth and diamond-finish products that have come out of DRDO, but available product, with good enough architecture to add systems progressively, and advance through every block with something achieved over the previous block.
My serious assessment is that the Tejas can eat some of its competition for breakfast (no, I am not naming that competition, I have absolutely no intentions of getting my nethers singed and smelling like a barbecue); the Arjuna, all said and done, far outshines the competition, and both of them are too little too late and underpowered.
You are very, very lucky - or relatively better managed - and you have this whiff of practicality about whatever you do.
No matter who you quote sir its always a treat reading your post specially the wit in it. I believe part of our relatively better management (and this has nothing to do with luck) is because of the limited resources we can put and we can afford to put. Its like not having the luxury to re invent the wheel and work what you can get.
You CANNOT do this. Your defence industry could be growing at an encouraging pace, or at an exhilarating pace, or at a satisfactory pace. Not an alarming pace. Unless you are trying to remind us that we had better watch out.
On a sober note, I have always felt that we in India need to root ourselves in technology even more strongly, and this is a wake-up call to our technical establishment.
Don't worry, it is not because they are completely self-sufficient, rather Pakistan know the fact that they can't afford to buy state of the art foreign equipment's because they need a lot of money for that. Well if they had the money to by F-16 they wouldn't have bought them already. USA was ready to sell F-16 at market rate to Pakistan, the congressmen were just against the subsidy you know.
I think it's a balancing act. They have tried to get the best they could for what they had.
We should have picked up the Mirages, for instance. Blunder!
New Recruit
LOL, Trillion !!!! Eve USa and russia combine dont export that muchPak weapons export is in trillions of USD