What's new

Pakistan ready to fight Kulbhushan's case in ICJ vigorously

.
If you have the proofs then bring it in the open and show it to the entire world.

The court has it and when the time is right it will be divulged to the proper authority if it has not been conveyed already. I sure the indian courts don't show evidence against a terrorist to every Tom, Dick and Harry.
 
.
Pakistan would loose badly, because since from day one Pakistan has never provided any proof, the international community does not accept fgcm trials as fair, this will humiliate Pakistan on an international level.
We arnt bond to answer icj :)
 
. . .
Will discuss that after we hang k.y . :D .

There will be no room for discussion after you hang KY, IWT would be scrapped and India would start building dams at will on all the rivers and there would be more boots on kashmir ground.
 
.
There will be no room for discussion after you hang KY, IWT would be scrapped and India would start building dams at will on all the rivers and there would be more boots on kashmir ground.
And you think we will die with thrist and let you live happily . we will surely take you down with us :) . 200+ warheads isnt for show off .
 
.
1. Him being a spy is disputed:rolleyes:.
2. ICJ has jurisdiction over the Vienna convention relating to consular access.
3. Please provide link about the 2008 agreement to support your claim.
4. You have no proof against him. Sartaj Asis said that few weeks before your mil court gave a verdict. Where did all evidence come in a second?
5. Yeah, go ahead, then why are you not hanging him yet. Afraid of international repercussions?
6. Don't expect China to veto everything that is against you. Which only further strain India-China relation. China is not going to buy that. May be if she does, it comes with a prize.
7. BS forged document created by Pakistanis
8. The dossier you send to UN about Jadhav is rusting on the Table of UN gen secy.
first Pakistan just before his death sentence gave a declaration to UN that it would not allow ICJ to interfere in its country security matter. its like same declaration India did in 1974 and used it to win cases against Pakistan. this time we did it.
secondly. kalboshan confessed before the court and all had been recorded.
third sartaj Aziz denied and rejected Indian propaganda on no evidence.
third. we are hanging it not only for spying but for terrorism as well.
4th. Indian constitution says that it will not accept any ICJ decision on common wealth countries with India. This will help us in the case. thank u for this amendment and1974 declaration.
5th.if ICJ accept this case than we will bring Kashmir to it on the same ground. if ICJ don't accept juristriction. its double standard will be exposed.
we will win the case based on evidences but your government haven't answered the simple question about his fake identity.
Indian government don't have any prove of his kidnapping. we have kalboshan and the world will accept our version.
 
.
And you think we will die with thrist and let you live happily . we will surely take you down with us :) . 200+ warheads isnt for show off .

If you were to fire nukes then think of the consequences of it, India would still have some land left but there would be none for pakistan.
 
. .
If you were to fire nukes then think of the consequences of it, India would still have some land left but there would be none for pakistan.
As you know how many warheads we hv :) . stop our water & you will see the consequences.

If army play :pleasantry: undemocratic, than all politicians, media, liars and NGOs would be united without delay.
4 baar aa chukey ho yaar :) ..
Jab log khud hi chaa rahey k in chor rulers say hamari jaan chutey to tumko democracy yaad agai ..
 
.
The court has it and when the time is right it will be divulged to the proper authority if it has not been conveyed already. I sure the indian courts don't show evidence against a terrorist to every Tom, Dick and Harry.

Anyhow ICJ would order pakistan to bring forth the evidence.
 
.
Anyhow ICJ would order pakistan to bring forth the evidence.
ICJ would just hear the reason for not providing him consular access. and by vianna convention spies don't have this right.
more ever history says that ICJ decision will take time and we can simply hang him on may 20 before decision is made. ICJ have not issued any stay order. just asked Pakistan to make measures to fight the case.
 
.
ICJ would just hear the reason for not providing him consular access. and by vianna convention spies don't have this right.
more ever history says that ICJ decision will take time and we can simply hang him on may 20 before decision is made. ICJ have not issued any stay order. just asked Pakistan to make measures to fight the case.
President of ICJ Ronny Abraham wrote to the Pakistan government letter, in effect, ordering a stay on the execution. The President of the ICJ used his powers under Article 74, paragraph 4 of the Rules of Court. Here’s what the section states:

Article 74, paragraph 4:
“Pending the meeting of the Court, the President may call upon the parties to act in such a way as will enable any order the Court may make on the request for provisional measures to have its appropriate effects.”
 
.
.
4 baar aa chukey ho yaar :) ..
Jab log khud hi chaa rahey k in chor rulers say hamari jaan chutey to tumko democracy yaad agai ..
I remember, last takeover was under forced circumstances.
After Kargil, India asked NS to deliver Musharraf, where Musharraf fought back his life and rest of passengers.
This is the short story of Musharraf takeover.
Without getting rid of all 3 popular political parties, its not possible to progress or army to do effective role.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom