Pakistan ranked 71 out of 155 economies

[Hello_10]

At the time of british we were having only 2 muslim graduates here so what they did was 10,000 times more disastrous than the pakistani rulers. Education is just one thing i can tell you many many things by which british ruined sub continent. But education is the most important one.

sir, tell me about India, how many graduates in their country in 1947? there might be many but Indian economy was 70% of agriculture only. British had made a type of society in India that only they had institutes/industries, where they used to have different exams and then get creamy layer of India, and then make products in Britain and sell in India. we won't expect graduates to live in British India, as, qualified people were simply taken by British during that period........

but, Pakistan remained under British federation for next 5-6 years, even Jinnah Saheb served as governor general of Britain till his death which simply means that Pakistan was on the best position to get favor from Britain that time, as compare to India who was celebrating freedom from Britain in 1947, buring British flags/ removing British identity from India bla bla at the time of freedom in 1947. just look on the number of Pakistanis and Bangladeshis in Britain, its 1.5 times to total number of India, China type very big countries and if they fall in low income group then its because Pakistani and Bangladeshi origins are mainly those who born there, before 1947 and by next 10 years through easy visa of Britain. while from the country like India, China, Russia etc, only those could go there who were having either big money for investments like Mr Mittal or high qualified people so they fall in high income group......

Per Capita Income of Pakistan on PPP was higher than that of India till 1994, if i remember, because of hefty resources, like Gas etc, and agriculture rich Punjab, Sindh etc. Pakistan was always on the better position to have higher growth than India. Indian friendship with SU during Cold War had helped Pakistan get full support from US also, along with Britain, and there is no reason why Pakistan isn't in comparison to Turkey type NATO's ally

 

[jayron]

sir, tell me about India, how many graduates in their country in 1947? there might be many but Indian economy was 70% of agriculture only. British had made a type of society in India that only they had institutes/industries, where they used to have different exams and then get creamy layer of India, and then make products in Britain and sell in India. we won't expect graduates to live in British India, as, qualified people were simply taken by British during that period........

but, Pakistan remained under British federation for next 5-6 years, even Jinnah Saheb served as governor general of Britain till his death which simply means that Pakistan was on the best position to get favor from Britain that time, as compare to India who was celebrating freedom from Britain in 1947, buring British flags/ removing British identity from India bla bla at the time of freedom in 1947. just look on the number of Pakistanis and Bangladeshis in Britain, its 1.5 times to total number of India, China type very big countries and if they fall in low income group then its because Pakistani and Bangladeshi origins are mainly those who born there, before 1947 and by next 10 years through easy visa of Britain. while from the country like India, China, Russia etc, only those could go there who were having either big money for investments like Mr Mittal or high qualified people so they fall in high income group......

Per Capita Income of Pakistan on PPP was higher than that of India till 1994, if i remember, because of hefty resources, like Gas etc, and agriculture rich Punjab, Sindh etc. Pakistan was always on the better position to have higher growth than India. Indian friendship with SU during Cold War had helped Pakistan get full support from US also, along with Britain, and there is no reason why Pakistan isn't in comparison to Turkey type NATO's ally

In spite of having numerous advantages over India, Pakistan's not so stellar performance were mainly due to two reasons- feudalism and lack of importance given to education. Feudalism ensured that most of its leaders and politicians were from feudal background carrying on their tribal mentality to rule the country and make policy decisions . General lack of importance to education means that you seldom hear success stories involving people outside the feudal families.

 

[saroshshahid]

In spite of having numerous advantages over India, Pakistan's not so stellar performance were mainly due to two reasons- feudalism and lack of importance given to education. Feudalism ensured that most of its leaders and politicians were from feudal background carrying on their tribal mentality to rule the country and make policy decisions . General lack of importance to education means that you seldom hear success stories involving people outside the feudal families.

Read history we had much lesser advantages and india was given much more advantages than us -___-

sir, tell me about India, how many graduates in their country in 1947? there might be many but Indian economy was 70% of agriculture only. British had made a type of society in India that only they had institutes/industries, where they used to have different exams and then get creamy layer of India, and then make products in Britain and sell in India. we won't expect graduates to live in British India, as, qualified people were simply taken by British during that period........

but, Pakistan remained under British federation for next 5-6 years, even Jinnah Saheb served as governor general of Britain till his death which simply means that Pakistan was on the best position to get favor from Britain that time, as compare to India who was celebrating freedom from Britain in 1947, buring British flags/ removing British identity from India bla bla at the time of freedom in 1947. just look on the number of Pakistanis and Bangladeshis in Britain, its 1.5 times to total number of India, China type very big countries and if they fall in low income group then its because Pakistani and Bangladeshi origins are mainly those who born there, before 1947 and by next 10 years through easy visa of Britain. while from the country like India, China, Russia etc, only those could go there who were having either big money for investments like Mr Mittal or high qualified people so they fall in high income group......

Per Capita Income of Pakistan on PPP was higher than that of India till 1994, if i remember, because of hefty resources, like Gas etc, and agriculture rich Punjab, Sindh etc. Pakistan was always on the better position to have higher growth than India. Indian friendship with SU during Cold War had helped Pakistan get full support from US also, along with Britain, and there is no reason why Pakistan isn't in comparison to Turkey type NATO's ally

Pakistan was in much worse condition than India -__- during independence... you are giving somewhere right info and somewhere wrong and be careful what you are telling and make your points clear and right