What's new

'Pakistan provided US info about Osama whereabouts

ghazi52

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Messages
102,847
Reaction score
106
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
'Pakistan provided US info about Osama whereabouts'

ISLAMABAD: Admitting that it had played a role in helping the United States locate and kill bin Laden in 2011, the Foreign Office on Tuesday said that it was Pakistan’s intelligence cooperation that provided the initial evidence to trace the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden.

Foreign Secretary Tehmina Janjua summoned the US Chargé d’Affaires Paul Jones to the Foreign Office on Tuesday and registered a strong protest on “unwarranted and unsubstantiated” allegations made against Pakistan by President Trump, which could seriously undermine vital cooperation between the two countries.

“Conveying her government’s disappointment on the recent tweets and comments by the US president, the US CdA was told that such baseless rhetoric about Pakistan was totally unacceptable,” the office of the foreign secretary said in a statement.

On Monday, President Trump told the Fox News the reasons for ending over a billion dollar annual aid for Pakistan was because the country didn’t do “a damn thing for us”.He also mentioned the stay of Osama bin Laden (OBL) in Pakistan before he was killed by the US forces.

In reply, the foreign secretary said: “We reject the insinuations about OBL, and want to remind the US that it was Pakistan’s intelligence cooperation that provided the initial evidence to trace the whereabouts of OBL.”

She added that no other country had paid a heavier price than Pakistan in the fight against terrorism.

“The US leadership had acknowledged on multiple occasions that Pakistan’s cooperation had helped in decimating the core al-Qaeda leadership and eradicating the threat of terrorism from the region. The US must not forget that scores of top AQ leaders were killed or captured by active Pakistani cooperation,” Ambassador Paul Jones was told.

Pakistan’s continued support to the efforts of international community in Afghanistan through ground, air and sea lines of communication was unquestionably critical to the success of the mission in Afghanistan.

“In the wake of recent US pronouncements to seek political settlement in Afghanistan, Pakistan and the US were working in close coordination with other regional stakeholders in order to end the prolonged conflict. At this critical juncture, baseless allegations about a closed chapter of history could seriously undermine this vital cooperation,” the secretary added.

Meanwhile, senior officials of the United States approached Islamabad to defuse the tensions, well-informed sources told a private TV channel.While praising Pakistan’s unrivaled sacrifices in the anti-terror campaign, the officials informed their Pakistani counterparts that Washington would require Islamabad’s additional assistance in the future too.

The US officials — in their written reply — promised “to inform President Trump about sacrifices rendered by Pakistan”.The officials also stated that the US would continue to engage with Islamabad on diplomatic channels.

Earlier, the Pentagon on Monday said that Pakistan remains a critical partner to the United States’ South Asia strategy.US Director of Defence Press Operations Colonel Robert Manning, speaking to reporters during an off-camera news conference, asserted that Pakistan “remains a critical partner” to America’s South Asia strategy.

“The US and Pakistan have strong mutual interests in the region. As you know, they are critical (and) vital to the South Asia strategy and including the facilitation of a peace process that would lead to a stable and peaceful Afghanistan,” Colonel Manning said.

Responding to a question about the recent series of tweets by President Trump, he said, “They [Pakistan] remain a critical partner in our South Asia strategy and there’s been no change to our military-to-military relationship with Pakistan.”

When told his answers differ with the views of the US president, Colonel Manning added, “I do not have any announcement on any change to the military-to-military relationship we have with Pakistan.”
 
. . .
In reply, the foreign secretary said: “We reject the insinuations about OBL, and want to remind the US that it was Pakistan’s intelligence cooperation that provided the initial evidence to trace the whereabouts of OBL.”

What evidence was provided?
 
.
Should have caught him ourselves. Either we were incompetent or we didn’t act in national interest.

Now we will live our whole lives with the stamp that he was caught by America in Pakistan.

Not only that, the other problem is that after this initial information was passed on, USA did not share any further developments that may - and should- have led to a joint operation to nab him. Why? Lack of trust? Fear of leaks?
 
. .
Should have caught him ourselves. Either we were incompetent or we didn’t act in national interest.

Now we will live our whole lives with the stamp that he was caught by America in Pakistan.
Bingo. Perception counts. The world does not have time to sift through ton of evidence and conclude "hey Pakistan was victim". And in this age of mass communication perception is just the headline over a one minute attention span. The world thinks -

  • OBL was the worlds most wanted terrorist.
  • OB was found in Pakistan
  • USA went in and killed him
This was a public relation disaster for Pakistan. It's like how do you get out of this one? I mean we know OBL was Saudi but 7 billion people on earth associate OBL -> Pakistan.

Not only that, the other problem is that after this initial information was passed on, USA did not share any further developments that may - and should- have led to a joint operation to nab him. Why? Lack of trust? Fear of leaks?
True, but USA should be prepared to reap the harvest. If you don't trust somebody even when they have given you some vital info, it will have consequences - going forward they will lose trust in you and expect them also to hold back info from you. Trust is a two way street.
 
.
Foreign Office is not telling something new.

Take your time to read the brilliant Abbottabad Commission Report; Pakistani perspective (impartial and comprehensive).
 
Last edited:
.
no one in the world can understand pakistani narrative that pak provided info to US about where abouts of OBL and based on that info US carried out the raid. he was sitting net to PMA and pak authorities didnt know of his location? it is also impossible to digest this story. if they knew why pak themselves didnt carry out the raid. i remember official statement at that time that pak did not have the technology for such mission. what the hell. pak didnt have the technology of breaking into a house? the whole matter is nothing but a matter of shame for pakistan.
 
. .
Someone cashed Osama bin Laden for 15 million USD but that person not exactly knows where Osama lived in Abbottabad, CIA uses Dr. Shakeel Afridi to trace him down...Later US seek permission for attack and I don't know who gave them go ahead but I am sure high ups knows before hand.
 
. . .
True, but USA should be prepared to reap the harvest. If you don't trust somebody even when they have given you some vital info, it will have consequences - going forward they will lose trust in you and expect them also to hold back info from you. Trust is a two way street.

Correct, and that is how both countries have arrived at the present situation. How it goes forward remains to be seen.
 
.
no one in the world can understand pakistani narrative that pak provided info to US about where abouts of OBL and based on that info US carried out the raid. he was sitting net to PMA and pak authorities didnt know of his location? it is also impossible to digest this story. if they knew why pak themselves didnt carry out the raid. i remember official statement at that time that pak did not have the technology for such mission. what the hell. pak didnt have the technology of breaking into a house? the whole matter is nothing but a matter of shame for pakistan.
I shall explain.

CIA and ISI were cooperating with each other in the search for Osama Bin Laden for a while (2001 - 2003) across Afghanistan and Pakistan respectively. However, cooperation [for the hunt of Bin Laden] stopped after the arrest of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed from an hideout in Rawalpindi in 2003:

https://www.theatlantic.com/interna...ssion-to-catch-khalid-sheikh-mohammed/255319/
https://www.biography.com/people/khalid-sheikh-mohammed-241188

- and CIA proceeded SOLO afterwards.

ISI did figure out the fact that some high-profile terrorists had taken refuge in Abbottabad, and was attempting to nab them on its own. For example, ISI learned about the whereabouts of Abu Faraj al-Libi in Abbottabad and arrested him about six months before the Operation Neptune Spear on May 2, 2011.

ISI was close to zeroing on the whereabouts of Bin Laden on its own but Americans caught him on May 2, 2011.

---

The compound where Bin Laden was caught was at a distance from the Pakistani Military Academy.

_52460639_osama_pak624.jpg


Looks close from above, but substantial gap there.
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom