What's new

Pakistan on the side of justice

Solomon2

BANNED
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
19,475
Reaction score
-37
Country
United States
Location
United States
logo.gif

Pakistan on the side of justice
By Imran Ahmad Khan
Published: March 5, 2016

1060006-ImranAhmadKhanNew-1457199369-596-640x480.JPG

The writer is a graduate of LUMS and has served as president of the LUMS Model UN Society (2013-2014)


A radicalised Pakistan’s long-drawn struggle to de-radicalise itself took a key turn when the law of the land took its due course, resulting inMumtaz Qadri’s hanging. However, it is what happens next that will define the narrative around Qadri and whether his hanging will help Pakistan on its way to de-radicalisation.

The country has been at the cross-roads of an impending ideological shift for a long time now. In a slow move towards realising the trouble that we have engulfed ourselves in, there have been multiple tipping points in our war against violent extremism. Bone-chilling stories of the Hazara genocide, the Mehran airbase attack, the APS attack — on multiple occasions, we have somehow managed to find a small voice to highlight what is evidently very wrong.

But for every protest against the APS attack, there is an Abdul Aziz. For every potential ideological shift against radicalisation, there are calls by the Jamaat-e-Islami to protest against Qadri’s hanging.

The state’s continued inaction after Salman Taseer’s murder went a long way in making Mumtaz Qadri the hero that he has become for many. Qadri’s famous court appearances saw hundreds of lawyers coming out in his support. He was able to inspire the formation of a Mumtaz Qadri Lovers’ Forum. Such has been the support for Qadri that it took our judicial system five years to exercise its authority. Basically, it took our state five years to gather the courage to execute a man who had confessed to having committed a murder. In such a context, many of us will see this as a small yet meaningful victory. However, this, in itself, is an indictment of our society.

222.jpg


As anticipated, Qadri’s hanging has led to protests in various parts of the country. His funeral was reportedly attended by 100,000 people. While the protests have been blacked out by the country’s electronic media, it is how the state reacts to these protests that is of importance to us. Qadri was served with justice and that is the end of his story. But those who glorify him need to be talked to with reasoning.

Isn’t it ironic that those who glorify Qadri do so under a false sense of love and reverence for a man who is remembered by everyone as an institution of compassion? Perhaps we have been blessed with a special moral compass that allows us to consider the possibility of killing others like this.

There is a need for an honest, state-led dialogue on this issue and the need is greater today than it was ever before. This is also where Pakistan’s political leadership needs to stand up and help in weaving a narrative of de-radicalisation. There are scores of people on the streets who believe that Qadri had a right to take away another man’s life. Many might call this a reductionist approach but this is what it boils down to — the fact that Qadri murdered another human being.

Qadri’s supporters idolise him as someone who epitomised the selflessness that a true Muslim should possess. But the tale of selflessness and compassion as shown by Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) in Taif is what we need to relate to instead of the one that Qadri propagated.

And if the laws will remain as they are then a question that needs answering is who committed blasphemy after all? Taseer, who asked for an end to the misuse of the law? Or Qadri, who violated the law and took it into his own hands to protect the same law? It sounds paradoxical.

This is a dangerous conversation to have, but one that is extremely critical. For, if we really want to live in a Pakistan free from the suffocating hold of radicalisation, we must immediately address the mindset that continues to penetrate through the masses.


Published in The Express Tribune, March 6th, 2016.

@PAKISTANFOREVER @Talwar e Pakistan @Spring Onion @Color_Less_Sky @Syed.Ali.Haider
 
.
Qadri is an enemy of the nation and he killed a person for rightly standing against the blasphemy law, a biased law against the secular vision of Jinnah which has continually been used to frame Christians and other minorities of crimes they did not commit. It is used to settle land disputes and other issues rather than being a law that prevents disrespect to the Prophet.

Taseer did not commit blasphemy. He tried to change a law that was discriminatory and used by mullahs to destroy lives and terrorists to solve "problems". Anyone supporting the murder is no better than these rabid mullahs.
 
.
Qadri is an enemy of the nation and he killed a person for rightly standing against the blasphemy law, a biased law against the secular vision of Jinnah which has continually been used to frame Christians and other minorities of crimes they did not commit. It is used to settle land disputes and other issues rather than being a law that prevents disrespect to the Prophet.

Taseer did not commit blasphemy. He tried to change a law that was discriminatory and used by mullahs to destroy lives and terrorists to solve "problems". Anyone supporting the murder is no better than these rabid mullahs.
99% of Blasphemy laws are filed against Muslims - Blasphemy laws ensures respect among our diverse community - looking at other countries ; a bit of provocation can lead to a ethnic riot resulting hundreds injured or dead. Blasphemy laws protect all religions - Hindus, Christians, Sikhs; everyone.
 
. .
He got what he rightly Deserved. Let leave it at that and give more more fuel to this Fire...
 
.
Qadri is an enemy of the nation and he killed a person for rightly standing against the blasphemy law, a biased law against the secular vision of Jinnah which has continually been used to frame Christians and other minorities of crimes they did not commit. It is used to settle land disputes and other issues rather than being a law that prevents disrespect to the Prophet.

Taseer did not commit blasphemy. He tried to change a law that was discriminatory and used by mullahs to destroy lives and terrorists to solve "problems". Anyone supporting the murder is no better than these rabid mullahs.

You mean Salman Tasir stood against blasphemy law? No sir. He never opposed this law. In this particular case, he was trying to defend a poor lady and that is all. But he was not against blasphemy law.
Also, this law is necessary. Since, none of the true Muslim can tolerate any filthy language or insulted words (Maa'z ALLAH) against Rasool Allah (saw) and also against ALLAH (Swt). If this law is not there people will start killing each others. Unfortunately, this law is not being implemented like it supposed to be and this make us think, it's not a good law. Law is needed, since, it's a Muslim country and this law is just to maintain peace in society.
 
.
99% of Blasphemy laws are filed against Muslims - Blasphemy laws ensures respect among our diverse community - looking at other countries ; a bit of provocation can lead to a ethnic riot resulting hundreds injured or dead. Blasphemy laws protect all religions - Hindus, Christians, Sikhs; everyone.

We don't have Blasphemy law. Riots like those in India and Pakistan are unheard of in BD. Learn from us.
 
.
Did Qadri act alone ? What about those accomplices who colluded and abetted the murder ? They must face the same fate. They probably promised Qadri that he would not face trial.
 
.
Both were killed by the same player. One was used to take out a strong political opponent who was later hanged to mop the whole episode up, blame went to religious extremists. Perfectly done but it smells BS to me.
 
.
The time someone says salman taseer was against Blasphemy law, the case is already lost. Salman Taseer was never went against law. But he had three points.
1) forgiveness for the lady
2) change in process of registering the complain
3) same punishment for the people who register false accusations

Now Qadri's hang came pretty wrong time not sure what was the motive. May those who hanged him wanted to make him a Hero? This is deep s**t , not much data was revealed on this.

Rightly mentioned by many, what happen to the people who encourage the murder?
 
.
99% of Blasphemy laws are filed against Muslims - Blasphemy laws ensures respect among our diverse community - looking at other countries ; a bit of provocation can lead to a ethnic riot resulting hundreds injured or dead. Blasphemy laws protect all religions - Hindus, Christians, Sikhs; everyone.
Then why isn't there a single clause saying insulting Ram, Shiv or other Hindu religious figures or Hinduism and Christianity itself is punishable. What is punishable is only insults to Islam or the Prophet but not only that, questioning the man made law according to mullahs amounts for blasphemy even though people like Taseer are not committing blasphemy but are questioning a law humans made-it is not Allah himself who made this law. Furthermore anyone can insult Hindus and others still.

Innocent people are dying and jailed because of this draconian law. The law is biased and against the spirit of Jinnahs Pakistan where all were supposed to be treated with respect and minorities especially were supposed to be integrated.
 
.
We don't have Blasphemy law. Riots like those in India and Pakistan are unheard of in BD. Learn from us.
You may not have any blasphemy law but unfortunately some bloggers were murdered for blasphemy
 
. .
Then why isn't there a single clause saying insulting Ram, Shiv or other Hindu religious figures or Hinduism and Christianity itself is punishable. What is punishable is only insults to Islam or the Prophet but not only that, questioning the man made law according to mullahs amounts for blasphemy even though people like Taseer are not committing blasphemy but are questioning a law humans made-it is not Allah himself who made this law. Furthermore anyone can insult Hindus and others still.

Innocent people are dying and jailed because of this draconian law. The law is biased and against the spirit of Jinnahs Pakistan where all were supposed to be treated with respect and minorities especially were supposed to be integrated.
If you read about Blasphemy laws it states that it protects ALL religions.

Blasphemy laws are active in 33 nations - 20 of them are Muslim nations. Canada, Brazil, Germany, Russia and ect... all use Blasphemy laws - but why is Pakistan the only country to get attention?
 
.
Both were killed by the same player. One was used to take out a strong political opponent who was later hanged to mop the whole episode up, blame went to religious extremists. Perfectly done but it smells BS to me.

Agreed.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom