SekrutYakhni
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2009
- Messages
- 3,284
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
Exactly!
But I do not think he will be able to speak anything after that..
God knows...
Pakistan not to accept extention in US. strikes
- Thread starter grey boy 2
- Start date
Exactly!
But I do not think he will be able to speak anything after that..
God knows...
S-2
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2007
- Messages
- 4,210
- Reaction score
- 0
"You're just avoiding the real question which is that the drone attacks are not nearly enough effective as advertised by your friends in the US army."
Neither the U.S. military nor the C.I.A. comment one way or another on the effectiveness of PREDATOR and REAPER. As to tactical reconnaissance drones, they won't be leaving our inventory anytime soon. They're incredibly effective.
"It's an American custom to spill innocent blood in foreign land. Please, don't try to conceal your crimes."
I'll only respond to this diatribe with respect to Afghanistan but America is there with forty other nations by the invite of the legitimate government of Afghanistan and under the mandate of the U.N. Crimes? It's not us that are providing sanctuary and it's not us that are killing the bulk of the afghan people-
"In the first six months of 2009, 59% of civilians were killed by AGEs [Anti-Government Elements] and 30.5% by PGF [Pro-Government Forces]."
UNAMA Mid-Year Bulletin On Protection Of Civilians In Armed Conflict-Afghanistan July 2009
The taliban kill Afghan civilians at a rate of 2:1 to ISAF forces. This, despite all that "overwhelming firepower" we sling around. That doesn't count all the blown limbs from IEDs-the taliban's preferred method of engagement. Many were INTENTIONALLY targeted to promote fear. That's why we call them TERRORISTS, btw. When not killing afghans, the taliban are equally noted for their propensity to use these unfortunates as human shields to avoid destruction at the hands of ISAF.
The Human Cost: The Consequences Of Insurgent Attacks In Afghanistan-Human Rights Watch April 2007
Don't discuss crimes with me when you haven't got a remote grasp on the facts as they're on the ground and there isn't a nation one that's on your side of this issue.
"That's sweet irony at its best."
Only a fool would find sweet another bomb exploding in Peshawar as confirmation of your "irony". So what menace have YOU let loose?
It was Pakistan's decision to provide the enemies of the U.N., Afghanistan, and ISAF with sanctuary. These enemies infected your tribal lands with their rhetoric. Your leadership elevated their status in the eyes of these impressionable tribals with their fawning attention. Those lessons weren't lost on these men and they've emulated what you freely will send to Afghanistan but won't accept for yourselves.
No kidding.
Get rid of the sanctuaries and you can again hold your heads high. Maintain them and Pakistan is a pariah in the eyes of every nation in Afghanistan. There's NO justification that will permit Pakistan the luxury of waging war and not bearing the consequences.
That's exactly what you do now with sanctuary. Only a fool would believe otherwise.
Thanks.
Neither the U.S. military nor the C.I.A. comment one way or another on the effectiveness of PREDATOR and REAPER. As to tactical reconnaissance drones, they won't be leaving our inventory anytime soon. They're incredibly effective.
"It's an American custom to spill innocent blood in foreign land. Please, don't try to conceal your crimes."
I'll only respond to this diatribe with respect to Afghanistan but America is there with forty other nations by the invite of the legitimate government of Afghanistan and under the mandate of the U.N. Crimes? It's not us that are providing sanctuary and it's not us that are killing the bulk of the afghan people-
"In the first six months of 2009, 59% of civilians were killed by AGEs [Anti-Government Elements] and 30.5% by PGF [Pro-Government Forces]."
UNAMA Mid-Year Bulletin On Protection Of Civilians In Armed Conflict-Afghanistan July 2009
The taliban kill Afghan civilians at a rate of 2:1 to ISAF forces. This, despite all that "overwhelming firepower" we sling around. That doesn't count all the blown limbs from IEDs-the taliban's preferred method of engagement. Many were INTENTIONALLY targeted to promote fear. That's why we call them TERRORISTS, btw. When not killing afghans, the taliban are equally noted for their propensity to use these unfortunates as human shields to avoid destruction at the hands of ISAF.
The Human Cost: The Consequences Of Insurgent Attacks In Afghanistan-Human Rights Watch April 2007
Don't discuss crimes with me when you haven't got a remote grasp on the facts as they're on the ground and there isn't a nation one that's on your side of this issue.
"That's sweet irony at its best."
Only a fool would find sweet another bomb exploding in Peshawar as confirmation of your "irony". So what menace have YOU let loose?
It was Pakistan's decision to provide the enemies of the U.N., Afghanistan, and ISAF with sanctuary. These enemies infected your tribal lands with their rhetoric. Your leadership elevated their status in the eyes of these impressionable tribals with their fawning attention. Those lessons weren't lost on these men and they've emulated what you freely will send to Afghanistan but won't accept for yourselves.
No kidding.
Get rid of the sanctuaries and you can again hold your heads high. Maintain them and Pakistan is a pariah in the eyes of every nation in Afghanistan. There's NO justification that will permit Pakistan the luxury of waging war and not bearing the consequences.
That's exactly what you do now with sanctuary. Only a fool would believe otherwise.
Thanks.
Last edited:
pakdefender
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2009
- Messages
- 5,671
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
your post was funny.....i enjoyed it
bhai, never seen these pictures before. Are they really from that incident?
"maja"
These pics are from downed predator drone that was brought down in the aftermath of the ground based incursion by US forces into Angoor Adda.
The US government never admitted that the drone was shot down and GoP never said that we did
but all this happened right after US ground troops conducted a ground based attack in broad daylight into the tribal areas.
This was also the occasion when Pakistani troops were given orders to fire at any further intrusions byt US/NATO ground forces. There was one more attempt after this by heli-borne US troops to land in Pakistani territory which was fired upon and it retunred to base in Afghanistan.
The 'maja' that indians were hoping to get from this incedent was that now the US will lauch a full scale attack on Pakistan but that never happened.
Last edited:
deckingraj
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
- Messages
- 5,192
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Not going much into it i just wanna ask couple of question...when you say Indians whom are you referring to?? As you just said neither US acknowledged that Drone was brought down nor Pakistan bring that up then from where Indians get to know about it and wanted to get so called "maja" out of it???? Also when you have got such a classified information would you mind sharing your source(even verbal will do since you might not be able to share anything classified)???
Edited :
I did find something.. May be this is what you were referring to...
http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=5868933&page=1
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/23/world/main4472666.shtml
Similar threads
