Pakistan needs to apologize to india. Asif ali zardari

[Sabretooth]

Someone is brave enough to admit it.

Since when did false admission of guilt became bravery?

 

[Tom M]

So a confession of an unknown person is acceptable? How do you even know that person was from JeM. It could be a Hari Lal from haryana pretending to be from JeM.

Also does everyone in India get 2 passports, one real and one with a fake ID? If not then WTF is this

Well you are self contradicting yourself .

Just because you say it doesn't that make it true, does it ??? That's what you are asking ???

The same will stand true for KY as well. It's you (Pakistan) who is saying all the above. Did you give India a chance to verify these so called evidence of yours ??? Why not conduct an open court trial of KY and allow Indian embassy to defend him with the help of an eminent Pakistani, read it clearly PAKISTANI LAWYER in your court of LAW ??? Why so afraid, if you have so called strong corroborative evidences, huh ???

 

[Baby Leone]

we Pakistanis need to have some sense before starting a thread at least verify it first before jumping like monkeys and start a thread.


its fake news its just yesterday he warned India with hard words.

 

[Crystal-Clear]

Someone is brave enough to admit it.

fake news.

 

[Imad.Khan]

Well you are self contradicting yourself .

Just because you say it doesn't that make it true, does it ??? That's what you are asking ???

The same will stand true for KY as well. It's you (Pakistan) who is saying all the above. Did you give India a chance to verify these so called evidence of yours ??? Why not conduct an open court trial of KY and allow Indian embassy to defend him with the help of an eminent Pakistani, read it clearly PAKISTANI LAWYER in your court of LAW ??? Why so afraid, if you have so called strong corroborative evidences, huh ???

No I am just highlighting your hypocrisy, What you are saying is that a confession is not acceptable but accusation with no proof is acceptable. As for giving India a chance, India had ample time to verify.For the latest check out the ICJ trial. Its not going to well for India.

Secondly why would a serving Navy officer be trialed in a civilian court.

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

How could Pak survive with such leaders at the first place????????

Let’s first solve this riddle to begin with!!!!

They sent the traitor terrorist agents at the topmost positions to kill Pak from inside for they can’t defeat her in an open confrontation!!!! Allah-u Azimushshan saves Pak....

 

[Placemat]

What a comedy show you guys have made the Indian subcontinent.

 

[khail007]

After one 'haram khor' disposed another 'haram khor' is haunting Pakistan.
Pakistan needs to get rid of such piglets.

 

[Placemat]

So a confession of an unknown person is acceptable? How do you even know that person was from JeM. It could be a Hari Lal from haryana pretending to be from JeM.

Also does everyone in India get 2 passports, one real and one with a fake ID? If not then WTF is this

Why not. Maybe he wanted to do smuggling racket in Iran. Getting fake passport can be done from anywhere even by isi who have supplied such take pp to it's terrorists. Easy to frame a guy you have kidnapped.
So what does this have to do with India.
Why was he kidnapped from Iran.

 

[Tom M]

Secondly why would a serving Navy officer be trialed in a civilian court.

Because it is not the kind of Military court that do exist/existed in other (sane) countries.

Do read about the same from your own publishers;

Nine facts you must know about military courts in Pakistan

An excerpt from the same;

3. Lack of transparency

There is no legal procedure which defines the work cycle of a military court. The decisions made by these courts cannot be challenged in any civilian court. Only a little information exists about the basis of convictions and acquittals.Also, the evidence is rarely made public. To top it all, no media is allowed to observe proceedings of any case.

FYI, the Biggest Military court ever was that was the Nuremberg Military Tribunal, setup for the famous Nuremberg trials post WWII. But that was never Opaque and all details were well documented and available completely in public domain.

It is the very Opaque nature of Pakistan's Military courts that is the question mark before it's credibility.

 

[newb3e]

Because it is not the kind of Military court that do exist/existed in other (sane) countries.

Do read about the same from your own publishers;

Nine facts you must know about military courts in Pakistan

An excerpt from the same;

3. Lack of transparency

There is no legal procedure which defines the work cycle of a military court. The decisions made by these courts cannot be challenged in any civilian court. Only a little information exists about the basis of convictions and acquittals.Also, the evidence is rarely made public. To top it all, no media is allowed to observe proceedings of any case.

FYI, the Biggest Military court ever was that was the Nuremberg Military Tribunal, setup for the famous Nuremberg trials post WWII. But that was never Opaque and all details were well documented and available completely in public domain.

It is the very Opaque nature of Pakistan's Military courts that is the question mark before it's credibility.

desperation!!

 

[Lasit Borphukan]

you know when one dog barks then the next and the next and soon we have Dog Qawali going on, this is how you recognize a dog

are you saying that your ex president is a "dog"?

 

[Areesh]

are you saying that your ex president is a "dog"?

Yes

We call him a thief and a dog irrespective of pulwama attack

 

[Men in Green]

fake news,

 

[Zee-shaun]

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10156533040996936

Zaleedari's mother should appologize to Pakistan first for giving birth to a blood sucking demon.