What's new

Pakistan needs more nukes?

nirreich

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
2,051
Reaction score
0
Country
Israel
Location
Israel
Hello everyone,

Just a general question: Why Pakistan develops more nuclear weapons?

According to most estimates it already possess more than 50 nuclear bombs which are more than enough to deter India from any military campaign. The proofs are India's restraint in the Kargil Crisis, in the 2002 tension after the terror attack against the Indian parliament house in New Delhi, after 26/11 terror attack in Mumbai, and in the crisis of 1990.

Developing more nuclear weapons requires building an expensive plutonium programme: nuclear powers, nuclear fuel fabrication facilities and of course plutonium processing facility. Furthermore, it requires developing long-range missiles in equivalence to a satellite/space programme and tactical nuclear weapons for use against India's conventional forces. Pakistan has no extra money to spend around and all these nuclear capabilities cost a lot of money. Some of the nuclear infrastructure could be used for producing electricity but clearly most of the nuclear programme is design to developing nuclear weapons.

Any ideas will be welcomed.
 
.
Hello everyone,

Just a general question: Why Pakistan develops more nuclear weapons?

According to most estimates it already possess more than 50 nuclear bombs which are more than enough to deter India from any military campaign. The proofs are India's restraint in the Kargil Crisis, in the 2002 tension after the terror attack against the Indian parliament house in New Delhi, after 26/11 terror attack in Mumbai, and in the crisis of 1990.

Developing more nuclear weapons requires building an expensive plutonium programme: nuclear powers, nuclear fuel fabrication facilities and of course plutonium processing facility. Furthermore, it requires developing long-range missiles in equivalence to a satellite/space programme and tactical nuclear weapons for use against India's conventional forces. Pakistan has no extra money to spend around and all these nuclear capabilities cost a lot of money. Some of the nuclear infrastructure could be used for producing electricity but clearly most of the nuclear programme is design to developing nuclear weapons.

Any ideas will be welcomed.
Yes Pakistan need more Nukes at least should have around 1000 and with ICBMs to deliver them where ever Pakistan wants them to reach because as it is now being made clear that American and Israel intentions are not good when it comes to Muslims Lands in General and Makkah and Madinah in specific we need lot of war heads to protect them and destroy as many as enemies as we can in case of any attack on Makkah and Madinah and end them for ever and make them part of history :sniper:
 
.
Yes Pakistan need more Nukes at least should have around 1000 and with ICBMs to deliver them where ever Pakistan wants them to reach because as it is now being made clear that American and Israel intentions are not good when it comes to Muslims Lands in General and Makkah and Madinah in specific we need lot of war heads to protect them and destroy as many as enemies as we can in case of any attack on Makkah and Madinah and end them for ever and make them part of history :sniper:

There is no and there never was any threat to Makkah and Madinah. KSA is a US ally.

Pakistan's nukes are against the US and Israel?
 
. . .
Hello everyone,

Just a general question: Why Pakistan develops more nuclear weapons?

According to most estimates it already possess more than 50 nuclear bombs which are more than enough to deter India from any military campaign. The proofs are India's restraint in the Kargil Crisis, in the 2002 tension after the terror attack against the Indian parliament house in New Delhi, after 26/11 terror attack in Mumbai, and in the crisis of 1990.

Developing more nuclear weapons requires building an expensive plutonium programme: nuclear powers, nuclear fuel fabrication facilities and of course plutonium processing facility. Furthermore, it requires developing long-range missiles in equivalence to a satellite/space programme and tactical nuclear weapons for use against India's conventional forces. Pakistan has no extra money to spend around and all these nuclear capabilities cost a lot of money. Some of the nuclear infrastructure could be used for producing electricity but clearly most of the nuclear programme is design to developing nuclear weapons.

Any ideas will be welcomed.

well i dont know why america has thousands of nukes to destroy the world many times i mean america cant live another time to destroy world second time :oops::what:

but i agree there are four reactors, the reactors should have the capacity to produce electricity we have enough nukes already, and its not 50, its close to 90 - 100
 
. . . .
Interesting, why?

More Nukes More money wasted....Instead of useful purpose & development...... More economic downturn ..more public resentment..more instability.....
When u want to kill someone..best way is to compel him & make himself commit suicide ..That is the best way to get away with murder......
Same thing that US did To USSR ....
Revenge is a Dish best served COLD ;)
 
.
The last thing Pakistan needs is more nukes. Despite this fact Pakistan has the fastes growing nuclear arsenal on earth- I don't know why seems like nothing more than an ego boost. 5-10 are enough for a deterrent but Pakistan seems intent on having 100s for whatever reason.
 
. .
More Nukes More money wasted....Instead of useful purpose & development...... More economic downturn ..more public resentment..more instability.....
When u want to kill someone..best way is to compel him & make himself commit suicide ..That is the best way to get away with murder......
Same thing that US did To USSR ....
Revenge is a Dish best served COLD ;)

This is off topic, but I hope you are wrong. Although the current regime in power in Islamabad is irresponsible and unreliable, unstable and impoverished Pakistan means bad news for India.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom