Tank131
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2015
- Messages
- 1,302
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Sorry, I don't discuss politics. I only look at reality(only discuss reality).
my question is simple. Turkish frigate had VLS? you know HQ16 is a very mature weapon. It is generally equipped with type 054, type 052c, type 052d, and type 055. do we really need to develop VLS for small frigates?—— OK. Now China agrees to equip the HQ16 to the Turkish frigate (I strongly support it). but where is the VLS of the Turkish frigate? or is it just PPT?
We should ask Turkish friends. when can i see your VLS? or let China help Turkish frigates develop VLS?
bro. they cut steel plates from 2019. so when can we see the Turkish frigate VLS? When was HQ16 installed on a Turkish frigate? This should ask Turkey.
I think i see the issue here. Turkish variant does not have VLS and you are asking where/why is China going to fit a vls into MILGEM as Turkey currently has it. Is that accurate?
The issue is supposedly solved. Turkey has already put out a scale model showing the ship is elongated by 10m with additional space between the main gun and bridge which has space for 2 8-cell vls. The space is already there in the modified variant being built for PN (it is essentially a modified MILGEM which puts it between ADA and MILGEM-G/MILGEM2 in size). Now whether the VLS unit itself is from China or not and whether the HQ-16 equips it is only going to be seen in the future, but the designs revealed by Turkey clearly show 2 VLS units for a total of 16 cells.
Jinnah Class model showing 16 VLS cells up front, and Gokdeniz CIWS in rear (personally would prefer Pantsir-M or Type 1130 with 6 HQ-10). They are marked with Pakistani flags indicating.
Vs
MILGEM/ADA class corvette with no VLS, and a 21 cell RAM launcher in the rear instead of the Gokdeniz CIWS found on the Jinnah class.