Hurter
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2014
- Messages
- 1,916
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
we need a Aircraft Carrier.
read it again.
Aircraft carrier's worth is more than our defence budget
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
we need a Aircraft Carrier.
read it again.
and i agree with youI have doubts over this report...
"in" meaning as in "these" so the last statement was qualifying the JF-17s as 5th generation.It says. "radar par na any waly in fifth generation tayyaron ......"
Says a lot about the standard of journalism in our country.
Where is the Money ??.... is it donation or loan.
You don't need to worry,If people with the largest open toilet and poor more than Africa can get weapons of billions then we surely can...
No idea for a procurement confirmation. But the level of testing being carried out by the JF-17 for naval weapons shows that some potential was thought about. Question is, the JF-17 being generally short legged.. will only just cover the EEZ and any loitering time for providing air cover for the fleet will be shaky.. so is it a plus from the current condition? Yes..
Is it the ideal airframe? NO.
Also, if the news is correct.. clever move by the PAF to dump this procurement bit on the Navy Budget..
They have FOREX worth 300 billion, and Pakistan mere 8..
Thats the difference..
Of the top of your head what do you think could be the possible ways to glean out a bit more range out of the Jf-17 apart from external fuel tanks ?
Do you think a more fuel efficient version of the RD-93 could be looked at ?
Or perhaps the Jf-17s for a Naval Role can be built with more composite material to lower the net-body-weight of the platform ?
No idea for a procurement confirmation. But the level of testing being carried out by the JF-17 for naval weapons shows that some potential was thought about. Question is, the JF-17 being generally short legged.. will only just cover the EEZ and any loitering time for providing air cover for the fleet will be shaky.. so is it a plus from the current condition? Yes..
Is it the ideal airframe? NO.
Also, if the news is correct.. clever move by the PAF to dump this procurement bit on the Navy Budget..
No idea for a procurement confirmation. But the level of testing being carried out by the JF-17 for naval weapons shows that some potential was thought about. Question is, the JF-17 being generally short legged.. will only just cover the EEZ and any loitering time for providing air cover for the fleet will be shaky.. so is it a plus from the current condition? Yes..
Is it the ideal airframe? NO.
Also, if the news is correct.. clever move by the PAF to dump this procurement bit on the Navy Budget..