Pakistan Naval Aviation - Updated

[Cornered Tiger]

World Air Forces 2016 Report suggest PNA operates 2 x Mi-14s.. Is It true???

 

[muhammadali233]

World Air Forces 2016 Report suggest PNA operates 2 x Mi-14s.. Is It true???

Army Ordered 2 or 3 for fire fighting purposes later decommissioned/cancelled or might be even Transferred to another arm

 

[Rain]

View attachment 294271

cant see the pic

 

[Ankit Kumar 002]

World Air Forces 2016 Report suggest PNA operates 2 x Mi-14s.. Is It true???

Do you have that in PDF , or its source ? If yes please share.Thanks.

 

[Cornered Tiger]

Do you have that in PDF , or its source ? If yes please share.Thanks.

https://www.flightglobal.com/asset/6297/waf/

Create your own account and get your copy. Section "Pakistan" at the end of Page 25. Sub-section "Pakistan Navy" at Page 26 first column.

Have a good read

Army Ordered 2 or 3 for fire fighting purposes later decommissioned/cancelled or might be even Transferred to another arm
View attachment 302833

These are designed to be Anti-Submarine Choppers. Navy can have a good time with them..

 

[fatman17]

The Mi14s are under the command of NDMA

 

[fatman17]

F27 MSA interior

 

[fatman17]

Karakoram Eagle

 

[fatman17]

On finals

 

[war&peace]

for how long we keep depending on 20 years old stuf time have came for both air and navy to go for new weapons if they cant buy new than atleast dont waste money on those systems who cannot deliver in war time better keep money safe P 3C was best but not know many systems came and many countries are replacing it every year we increase our defence budget but our defence dont get anything new than why increase defence budget

In military hardware 20 yrs is not a lot of time. F-16 is from 1970s and still it is going strong, F-15 is even older and that's USAF main strike platform till date. Naval equipment is normally more expensive just due to sheer size and weapons systems on it, so would be foolish to replace it after 5-10 years. However, these systems get periodic upgrades with new electronics, weapon systems and other equipment through retrofits. You can change your point and shoot camera or a smart phone every year but you will find it difficult to change your car especially if you have slightly better brand like Bentley or Maybach unless you are super rich.

 

[Super Falcon]

In military hardware 20 yrs is not a lot of time. F-16 is from 1970s and still it is going strong, F-15 is even older and that's USAF main strike platform till date. Naval equipment is normally more expensive just due to sheer size and weapons systems on it, so would be foolish to replace it after 5-10 years. However, these systems get periodic upgrades with new electronics, weapon systems and other equipment through retrofits. You can change your point and shoot camera or a smart phone every year but you will find it difficult to change your car especially if you have slightly better brand like Bentley or Maybach unless you are super rich.

Tell me when did Pak airforce and navy bought new weapons other than F 22 FRIGATE and JF 17
after 2000 these two did nothing our Navy if you take 4 F 22 frigates it uses old ships

F 16 don't consider new them and only thunder you can say it is new one

 

[war&peace]

Tell me when did Pak airforce and navy bought new weapons other than F 22 FRIGATE and JF 17
after 2000 these two did nothing our Navy if you take 4 F 22 frigates it uses old ships

F 16 don't consider new them and only thunder you can say it is new one

Have you read my comment?

 

[MastanKhan]

for how long we keep depending on 20 years old stuf time have came for both air and navy to go for new weapons if they cant buy new than atleast dont waste money on those systems who cannot deliver in war time better keep money safe P 3C was best but not know many systems came and many countries are replacing it every year we increase our defence budget but our defence dont get anything new than why increase defence budget

Hi,

For not procuring the right equipment to fill in the hole left by sanctions---that is tantamount to treason.

That is why I have stated many a times that Paf has comitted treason against the state.

There is nothing wrong with a 20 years old weapon----but until and unless you have not upgraded them and procured newer machines---it is a fail fail situation.

And about the P3C's----now don't under estimate the power of older electronic equipment. It depends a lot on the operator and his officer---.

To give you an example---many a retired U S satelites who are considered dead maybe still supplying data that is useful.

As long as some of our offensive capabilities are matching the enemy---the older equipment will do its job right.

 

[fatman17]

Pakistan Navy ATR 72 at Dusseldorf Monchengladbach Airport - Germany

PostFri Jun 24, 2016 6:40 pm

Pakistan Navy ATR 72-500 aircraft serial number 79 seen at Dusseldorf Monchengladbach Airport, Germany, on June 20, 2016, probably for maintenance checks at Rheinland Air Service (RAS) - ras.de.

 

[.]