What's new

Pakistan must not give India MFN status

Monopoly doesn't get you anywhere. For 20 years we drove rickety ambassadors and premier padmini. Only after market was opened Indian companies worked hard facing competition from established foreign brands. They shed off the rust and came out as front runner.

But also, some protection is needed from govt for native companies. Let them face the chin music but don't forget to arm them as well.

That's the name of the game. Pretend to be an 'open' economy while giving your guys every advantage possible.
 
I'm not certain if Pakistanis know the difference between Indian and Chinese products. Chinese products are designed mostly for the Western export markets and adopted in China with very little localization.
Indian industries are more focused towards the domestic market, which is quite similar to Pakistani markets. Indians are creating local products and solutions which are extremely relevant to Pakistan.
 
Firstly-We will find other areas of oppurtunities if Pakistan does not give us MFN thas because Indian Firms have started acquiring assets and will be on a spree in one market or the another....
Secondly-Protectionism is nothing new ....The US itself is into Protectionism so why single out India alone and thus its not a game but a simple policy to give local companies an oppurtunity to grow and it takes time.
Thirdly-Is Pakistani Independent some credible news source in Pakistan...
 
China, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Srilanka, Afghanistan shall have priority.
 
FYI... when Indians were using Ambassadors we were using Chevrolet, Opel, Mercedes, Ford, while Japanese entered market by only selling cars to Pakistanis.

Don't fool us with concept car pictures.
Not a single Indian is using those cars. If you have one than give one to your President, first.

Don't try to gauge us with your little scales.

I prefer to buy Chinese made any day.....
BYD Auto,Build Your Dreams

byd-f3dm-610b.jpg

Our President and Prime minister have their own cars. You would be surprised to believe our President and Prime minister have their own plane much like Airforce one

India's Air Force One takes off with President on board - The Times of India


Please get one for your president, prime minister.

The President of India uses a Mercedes Benz 500 SEL (W126)and a stretched, armored Mercedes-Benz S-Class W221 with the national emblem on the license plate, while the Prime Minister uses an B7-level armored BMW 7 Series. Both are escorted by the SPG in Tata Safari and BMW X5 models.
BMW 7 series- used by Prime Minister of India
The Vice President of India uses a white BMW 7-series (B6 armor level)

Air India One (AI-001) is the call-sign of any aircraft with the Prime Minister of India or the President of India on-board. This plane is also known as VIP-1 or Tanjore. Since 2003, a Boeing 747-437B, equipped with jamming equipment, anti-missile systems and air-to-air refueling facility, has been used as Air India One
 
New Delhi: India has expressed the hope that the Pakistan Government implements the recommendations of the Panel of Economists appointed by the Pakistani Planning Commission, to give MFN status to India and shift from a positive list of imports to a negative list regime to achieve a five-fold increase in bilateral trade from US$ 2 billion to US$ 10 billion.

This expectation came today from Ms. Nirupama Rao, India’s Foreign Secretary, while inaugurating the FICCI Conference on India-Pakistan Economic Relations: Prospects & Challenges.

The Foreign Secretary assured business leaders from Pakistan and India of her country’s commitment to facilitating greater economic cooperation and integration between India and Pakistan and the South Asia region. She said, “India has maintained a ‘sensitive list’ of around 850 tariff lines for all the non-LDC Member of SAFTA, including Pakistan. Trade under these items is allowed under MFN basis. Over the years, our tariff rates have come down to the levels prevailing globally”.

Ms. Rao said that to improve infrastructure and streamline and harmonise customs procedures at the land borders, the Government of India was setting up a modern integrated check post at the India-Pakistan border at Attari for trade facilitation. This is expected to be ready by April 2011. Arguing for the opening up of more rail and road routes and expanding the existing capacities on operational routes, the Foreign Secretary said, “As things stand, Pakistan allows only the import of about 110 items from India through the land route, while it allows the export of only one item, cement, to India by the road route”. Pakistan should permit all permissible items for trade via the Attari-Wagah route, she declared.

On its part, India, she said, was open to looking at the existing bilateral visa agreement signed in 1974 to facilitate travel by bonafide businessmen from both countries. Regarding the oft-repeated complaint about non-tariff barriers imposed by India on exports from Pakistan, Ms. Rao clarified that during all the multilateral trade talks under SAFTA, India’s consistent position has been that it welcomes the growth of exports from Pakistan to India.

“We would request that instead of raising issues related to NTBs in a generalized manner, it would be more useful if specific instances can be brought to our notice, which are found to be specifically discriminatory for Pakistani exports to India. Most non-tariff issues raised by Pakistan are linked with phyto-sanitary measures, and other domestic regulations of consumer protection. There is no discrimination against Pakistani exports because the same standards are being applied for imports from any other country,” she pointed out.

Ms. Rao said that India and Pakistan have complementarities in their economies which can create a ‘win-win’ for all sides. India’s fast growing economy and a large market should be seen as an opportunity by Pakistani business and industry. India could also be a reliable and cost effective source of investments, tested technology, raw materials and entrepreneurial skills for Pakistan. Likewise, Indian could draw upon the strength of the Pakistan economy. The Foreign Secretary listed out areas of mutually beneficial cooperation in sectors such as agriculture, food processing, energy, Small & Medium Enterprises, Information Technology, social & economic infrastructure. “Opportunities for cooperation are plentiful; we only have tom seize them, by rising above our political differences, for the welfare of our two people,” she said.

Mr. Sultan Chawla, President, Federation of Pakistan Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI), in his remarks, noted that there was huge scope for growth of trade between the two sides. He called for removal of NTBs by India and facilitation of movement of people across borders. To start with there was a need for increasing the traffic frequency by road, rail and air, increase in customs check posts, allowing bank branches to be opened in both countries and trade facilitation. While agreeing as fair the grant of MFN status to India by Pakistan, Mr. Chawla called upon India to lower the tariffs on goods of interest to Pakistan. In the longer term, he said there would be need to cooperate on regular cross-border investment flows and encouragement to FDI in each other’s country.

Mr. Rajan Bharti Mittal, President, FICCI, stated that the fulcrum of India-Pakistan relations should be business-to-business and people-to-people contacts. For this, restrictions on the issuance of visas needed to be eased and traffic from the Wagah border increased. Mr. Vikramjit Singh Sahney, Senior Vice President, SAARC Chamber of Commerce and Industry, noted that the business community of both India and Pakistan realize that by more open and free trade, the economies of both nations would reap huge gains. “We are confident that a move would be mutually beneficial since our economies have a lot of complementarities, as we are natural partners of trade”.

Mr. S M Muneer, President, India-Pakistan Chamber of Commerce and Industry, pointed out that greater economic cooperation between the two countries could provide mutual economic benefits, such as lower prices for the consumers, the much needed revenue for the governments and cost effective gas import to India via Pakistan. Most importantly, it could generate a new linkage between the two business communities, thereby nurturing constituencies for peace in the region, he said.

The inaugural session of the conference was also addressed by Mr. Tariq Sayeed, Immediate Past President, SAARC Chamber of Commerce and Industry and Mr. Siegfried Herzog, Regional Director-South Asia, Friedrich Naumann Foundation.

I do not understand why people fail to read and analyise the article here,

It says
- India exports 110 Items to Pakistan
- Pakistan exports 1 Item to India.

India wants to buy more products from pakistan - cuz of Indian demand.

Comeone guys show some common sense.
 
FYI:-
India's president has not served 11 years of jail and not involved in bomb plot...
And our prime minister singh has not served 6 years of jail....
 
Will pakistan give MFN status to India ?

They will ! they will have to.

Fuget what our pakistani friends on this forum or in pakistan think. I dont want to comment the economic knowhow of our pakistani friends on this forum but any think tank on this forum will anyday opt for indiaas they understand how drastically will it benefit pakistan. even much more than MFN with china.

@THINK TANKS :- plz comment on my claim and justify !

Thanks !
 
They will ! they will have to.

Fuget what our pakistani friends on this forum or in pakistan think. I dont want to comment the economic knowhow of our pakistani friends on this forum but any think tank on this forum will anyday opt for indiaas they understand how drastically will it benefit pakistan. even much more than MFN with china.

@THINK TANKS :- plz comment on my claim and justify !

Thanks !

India has been asking for MFN status from pakistan since MMS came to Power that is almost 7 years since.

I agree with you yes it will happen but the question is When ? Pakistan and India share lot of common things i would say almost everthing is common,

I would very much appreciate if Pakistani/Indian members tell me why Pakistan should not give India MFN status and who/was in Pak is making these decisions?

That will answer all my questions - Thanks
 
Back
Top Bottom