What's new

Pakistan Missile Technology


Did you even read it first ??? Let me help you with just the first para, read it carefully:

" It can not be denied, that the Pakistani solid fuel rockets Ghaznavi and Shaheen-1 are similar to the Chinese DF-11 missile type. On photos is recognizable, that the Chinese DF-11 and DF-11A by set of some solid fuel segments are built.The DF-11 uses two segments. For the DF-11A is a third segment added. For the Pakistani Shaheen-1 is a further half segment added. All rocket types have the same diameter of 0.88 m. The Shaheen-1 have however a striking extended skirt in the nozzle area, because the nozzle has a larger diameter. "

So if they are exact copies and bought from abroad, then why the difference being told, which can be seen in the red highlighted part.

Even the author is using the word probably many times, suggesting he is even not sure himself. He deems Shaheen 2 to be a copy of M-18, but where is M-18 picture. If there is no picture of M-18, then how the hell can he make the similarity.

So read before you come up with your these sarcastic remarks.
 
both china and pakistan took help from ukrain in getting air launch cruse missile of ussr the famous kh-55 and also suspition of copying tomahak from which landed in pakistan .whether its true or propaganda we dont know . but after seeing babur we are not hearing any development of any long range cruse missile by pakistan or even ship/submarin launch version of babur.:eek::hitwall:

dear sir producing missiles is a little bit complex than making Cadbury chocklate.
Naval version of babur is under development and it maybe tested when ready.

I also believe that recent tests which were not made public but were reported later on supposedly included a New missile system code named Hataf VII god knows what it was.

There were reports of an extended range and speed variant of Babur Cruise missile being developed but nothing has come up yet.

Turkey is quite interested in the naval version of babur that it can be integrated on Milgem corvetts and TF2000 frigates in the future to be used by both navys.

regards.
 
Did you even read it first ??? Let me help you with just the first para, read it carefully:

" It can not be denied, that the Pakistani solid fuel rockets Ghaznavi and Shaheen-1 are similar to the Chinese DF-11 missile type. On photos is recognizable, that the Chinese DF-11 and DF-11A by set of some solid fuel segments are built.The DF-11 uses two segments. For the DF-11A is a third segment added. For the Pakistani Shaheen-1 is a further half segment added. All rocket types have the same diameter of 0.88 m. The Shaheen-1 have however a striking extended skirt in the nozzle area, because the nozzle has a larger diameter. "

So if they are exact copies and bought from abroad, then why the difference being told, which can be seen in the red highlighted part.

Even the author is using the word probably many times, suggesting he is even not sure himself. He deems Shaheen 2 to be a copy of M-18, but where is M-18 picture. If there is no picture of M-18, then how the hell can he make the similarity.

So read before you come up with your these sarcastic remarks.


No no its all wrong in fact shaheen series are actually Iranian Shahab Missiles which we bought from them and then painted in a different color scheme .

Let them live in their pipe dreams _:rolleyes:
 
So if they are exact copies and bought from abroad, then why the difference being told, which can be seen in the red highlighted part.

A further segment added is not a huge feat is it? China, the country that developed this missile added a segment from the DF-11 to make the DF-11A, are you telling me they couldn't add another segment?


Even the author is using the word probably many times, suggesting he is even not sure himself. He deems Shaheen 2 to be a copy of M-18, but where is M-18 picture. If there is no picture of M-18, then how the hell can he make the similarity.


The M-18 is identical to the Shaheen 2, just compare the pictures yourself, and a lot more credible sites confirm it.
 
A further segment added is not a huge feat is it? China, the country that developed this missile added a segment from the DF-11 to make the DF-11A, are you telling me they couldn't add another segment?

If you think adding half segment or putting some other minor design change is a kids play, well then your knowledge about missiles and defence products is laughable.




The M-18 is identical to the Shaheen 2, just compare the pictures yourself, and a lot more credible sites confirm it.

I have so far not seen any picture of M-18 missile on internet, your help in this regard would be needed.

And here is the supposed to be M-18s specifications:

Propellant Solid
Guidance Inertial

Deployment mobile
Range (km) 1,000-1,200
Re-entry Vehicle Mass (kg) 400-500
Warhead Yield conventional
Lethal Radius
[soft target] 10 meters [crater]
60 meters [unitary]
250 meters [submunition]
CEP (meters) 200

And here is something related to Shaheed 2:

The re-entry vehicle carried by the Shaheen-II missile has a mass of 1050kg, which includes the mass of a nuclear warhead and a terminal guidance system. The terminal guidance system is most likely a radar correlation terminal seeker, which allows the warhead to achieve a CEP in the range of 30-50 m.

Operational range 2,500 km


Nearly everything double to the M-18.


So now quit your these pathetic troll posts as you can't proof anything.
 
Casting doubts and proving with credible proof are two different things, understand the difference.

Lets forget about if its a Pakistan production or not for a second.
lets asume we bought it from china as abi is trying to prove all right then even if we have bought those MRBM from china it shows the nature of sinopak relationship that they would even supply us ballistic missiles if needed.

On the other hand here is Iran ready to pay mouth full money for S300 to russians for saving their @$$ from Israelis and they are being put down for a god damn air defense system by russians on israeli pressure.

it shows how much you are wanted on the world stage and because of your stupid stone age govt no one would help iran to defend itself.
 
Hello and thanks for providing the informative and great post..

I can only say that you done a great job.. I am job hunter tips provider and my aim is to see most of the Pakistani people on job.. Good work

Have a good day!

Sana
 
Last edited:
A further segment added is not a huge feat is it? China, the country that developed this missile added a segment from the DF-11 to make the DF-11A, are you telling me they couldn't add another segment?.


you means to say that only china have right to add segment ?


The M-18 is identical to the Shaheen 2, just compare the pictures yourself, and a lot more credible sites confirm it.

Yes and Raad missile look similar to us one so as per theory made in US
 
Is there even a picture of the M-18 ? Isn't the DF-25 based on this ? The one that got canceled.
 
Last edited:
Hi
Pakistan missiles are indigenous or not, what matters is that they are in working conditions and we have nuclear war heads to go with them, we surely can kick some serious butt, as for those who point a finger at Pakistan forget that there are 3 fingers being pointed right at them, we are not behind our enemy incase a nuclear war erupts, but some will be getting a serious whooping :bounce: in case they are attacked or engage a war with their respective enemies
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom