What's new

Pakistan makes offer to India

Foreign policy of Pakistan is managed by Pakistan's establishment and there in no change in Pakistan's stand.
There is change.
Bajwa has said lets us forget kashmir for 100 years. And imran khan ouster was also on the reason that imran khan was not going slow on india. Imran forcefully on armys instructions started dialog backchannels with india.

First demand was of article 370 restoration. India refused.
Imran even get back on this and agreed on just the restoration of statehood. Which india would give itself when ever they want.but giving it with deal from pakistan would give Pakistan just some brownie points.
India even refused at that.

India was like kashmir ka name bhi na lo. So what else is there to talk about.

And first time print wrote and article advising imran khan to listen to hia generals.
Usually india says pm must not listen to their generals but here they want us to.
 
.
There is no solution for Kashmir issue, not after Article 370. Indians won't give up the J&K and Pakistan will not give up AJK, so there will always remain a stalemate unless one party soften its stance, and whoever did will be suicide for its political or military career because both nations are heavily invested in not just the geographic factor but also emotional sentiment to the whole Kashmir.
 
.
:lol:
Sorry about the laugh mates. SS has literally accepted that Pakistan was a problem to not only India but also in a larger Scale.

There was a time when this retarded news Paper Dawn was talking about India Iran USA collaboratoin :rofl:
He stated Pakistan's official narrative and there is no change in that. Where did you get that he implied that Pakistan was a problem?
 
.
He stated Pakistan's official narrative and there is no change in that. Where did you get that he implied that Pakistan was a problem?
"Sharif insisted that Pakistan was “committed to the maintenance of regional peace,” adding that Islamabad’s contribution to fighting terrorism was “well known and globally acknowledged.”"

I maybe wrong, but i think that India had some requests from Pakistan about some issues, as a matter of fact India has always been accusing Pakistani side in international forums. SS is literally saying that yes you were right and we are commited to fixing your concerns not only regionally but also globally.
 
. .
Pakistan and India should probably look at the Northern Ireland Good Friday agreement in detail and work out the possibilities of compromise. But that would require a seriousness, forgiveness and foresight-ness that most South Asians lack.

No chance of a resolution in the next 100 years, maybe a worldwide nuclear holocaust will remind humanity of the need for peaceful co-existence.
This will not work (or seen necessary) because both sides have well defined and defended border at LoC. In recent years, Indian side does not have much attrition.
 
.
They have started selling out Kashmir. That didn't take long at all.
 
.
"Sharif insisted that Pakistan was “committed to the maintenance of regional peace,” adding that Islamabad’s contribution to fighting terrorism was “well known and globally acknowledged.”"

I maybe wrong, but i think that India had some requests from Pakistan about some issues, as a matter of fact India has always been accusing Pakistani side in international forums. SS is literally saying that yes you were right and we are commited to fixing your concerns not only regionally but also globally.
This is official statement since forever and no SS is not saying what you are implying.
 
.
This is official statement since forever and no SS is not saying what you are implying.
Sure, as i said imaybe wrong and SS is simply trying to calm things down. A political tactic/manuever
 
.
Sure, as i said imaybe wrong and SS is simply trying to calm things down. A political tactic/manuever
Bro, that same line has been repeated numerous times. It's what has always been said. Nothing new. (As of yet)

SS is not that stupid to do something like that before the elections. Imran Khan's power is already massive.
 
.
This will not work (or seen necessary) because both sides have well defined and defended border at LoC. In recent years, Indian side does not have much attrition.

I didn't mean exact copy, I mean a working arrangement with perhaps more autonomy for the local regions in both countries. But yeah, the Indian side's insistence that it's not a disputed territory is the primary reason why this conflict will not be resolved in at least my life time.
 
.
I didn't mean exact copy, I mean a working arrangement with perhaps more autonomy for the local regions in both countries. But yeah, the Indian side's insistence that it's not a disputed territory is the primary reason why this conflict will not be resolved in at least my life time.
.. actually, Indian side maintains that the territory in Pakistan's control is disputed :laugh:

But I see your larger point. This issue is at an impasse
 
.
Back
Top Bottom