Pakistan likely to have another Ballistic Missile test

[Blue Marlin]

I have been actively lobbying for this (with some very specific ideas) with those folks but unfortunately they don't take orders from me lol. New systems are being worked upon by my guess 2 missiles and 1 UAV. This is just my GUESS based on hints and deductive reasoning. We'll see them when we see them.


Ra'ad, Anti-Runway Bombs, mk82/83 etc, lots of avionics, Range Extension Kits, Possibly a laser guidance kit for bombs, Shahpar UAV. Stuff like that.

so were looking at a raad v2 then. hope fully with folding control surfaces

 

[JamD]

so were looking at a raad v2 then. hope fully with folding control surfaces

Frankly, I have no idea. There is something supersonic too which Ra'ad isn't. That is the extent of my information.

 

[Blue Marlin]

Frankly, I have no idea. There is something supersonic too which Ra'ad isn't. That is the extent of my information.

probably to troll india!

possibly something along the lines of brimstone or hellfire?

 

[JamD]

probably to troll india!

possibly something along the lines of brimstone or hellfire?

Your guess is as good as mine.

 

[Blue Marlin]

Your guess is as good as mine.

well its a good one since the agm-65's are getting old and in need of replacement.

 

[Bilal Khan (Quwa)]

I have been actively lobbying for this (with some very specific ideas) with those folks but unfortunately they don't take orders from me lol. New systems are being worked upon by my guess 2 missiles and 1 UAV. This is just my GUESS based on hints and deductive reasoning. We'll see them when we see them.

What would need to be done to make the Ra'ad JF-17 compatible? I guess one would need to start by shifting the air-breathing intakes from the bottom to the sides, like the SOM-J and/or perhaps reduce the weight such that it can be carried from the wings. However, since the Ra'ad is designed principally for the strategic role, weight reduction - and the risk of reducing range and payload - would be flagged as a no-no.

The JSOW dispenser might not be a big deal considering that the Chinese have already developed the YJ-6, which we can try licensing. The real issue would be guided bomblets.

 

[Blue Marlin]

What would need to be done to make the Ra'ad JF-17 compatible? I guess one would need to start by shifting the air-breathing intakes from the bottom to the sides, like the SOM-J and/or perhaps reduce the weight such that it can be carried from the wings. However, since the Ra'ad is designed principally for the strategic role, weight reduction - and the risk of reducing range and payload - would be flagged as a no-no.

The JSOW dispenser might not be a big deal considering that the Chinese have already developed the YJ-6, which we can try licensing. The real issue would be guided bomblets.

they only move the intake to the side so it can fit inside the f35 . norway did the same with the jsm

----
something simply shaped like the storm shadow (below) or kedp-350. then again nothing is ever simple.
but who knows

 

[JamD]

I have been actively lobbying for this (with some very specific ideas) with those folks but unfortunately they don't take orders from me lol.

What would need to be done to make the Ra'ad JF-17 compatible? I guess one would need to start by shifting the air-breathing intakes from the bottom to the sides, like the SOM-J and/or perhaps reduce the weight such that it can be carried from the wings. However, since the Ra'ad is designed principally for the strategic role, weight reduction - and the risk of reducing range and payload - would be flagged as a no-no.

The JSOW dispenser might not be a big deal considering that the Chinese have already developed the YJ-6, which we can try licensing. The real issue would be guided bomblets.

That is exactly what those specifics are.

On Ra'ad/JF-17: I suspect flutter is a very big issue with mounting something that big, with a square cross section under the wings (which has permanently deployed stabilization surfaces of its own). Once there is a desire to integrate an ALCM on the JF-17 I don't think coming up with a system would be a problem for AWC. Folding control surfaces, side-mounted intakes, better packing of internal components, higher energy fuel, all are good ideas. I would still feel better structurally and aerodynamically, if it was mounted on the centerline.

Let's not derail the thread anymore. It's about a possible ballistic missile test.

 

[Bratva]

What would need to be done to make the Ra'ad JF-17 compatible? I guess one would need to start by shifting the air-breathing intakes from the bottom to the sides, like the SOM-J and/or perhaps reduce the weight such that it can be carried from the wings. However, since the Ra'ad is designed principally for the strategic role, weight reduction - and the risk of reducing range and payload - would be flagged as a no-no.

The JSOW dispenser might not be a big deal considering that the Chinese have already developed the YJ-6, which we can try licensing. The real issue would be guided bomblets.

TO make Ra'ad as sleek as JASSM-ER like this

 

[Ultima Thule]

Didnt i say Us and india are tools, how can u say Us is not athreat when they invaded an entire country in our nieghbourhood to provide safe heavens to raw to launch operations like ttp and bla in pakistan, come out of delusions, Us will not be threat to us because israel is on the range of shaheen three, remove that israel in range factor and see how they blow pakistan to smithereens in a day, dont act smart if u got no understanding of geo politics..

But bro if we tested ICBM the whole western world will impose sanction us like Iran and North Koera, so how we will survive in that time frame please explain me, you are looking at only one angle

 

[Awan68]

But bro if we tested ICBM the whole western world will impose sanction us like Iran and North Koera, so how we will survive in that time frame please explain me, you are looking at only one angle

Who's said we should test an icbm??, pakistan is already playing the smart card to keep Us at bay, yes we shldnt test an icbm until our economy is atleast 2 trillion dollars, after that test 100 icbms, let them try and impose sanctions, we wont give a damn, not smart right now i agree but u must understand that the Us is a buisiness run by israel and as long as israel is in our nuke range all the Us can do is fund groups like ttp or bla to break pakistan internally, they will never dare to attack us..

 

[WarFariX]

Ok sir ... but koi yeh tu bataye test kya huwa ?

I want to party tonight ...

free mein party :-/ ...test hoa nai

 

[Ultima Thule]

Who's said we should test an icbm??, pakistan is already playing the smart card to keep Us at bay, yes we shldnt test an icbm until our economy is atleast 2 trillion dollars, after that test 100 icbms, let them try and impose sanctions, we wont give a damn, not smart right now i agree but u must understand that the Us is a buisiness run by israel and as long as israel is in our nuke range all the Us can do is fund groups like ttp or bla to break pakistan internally, they will never dare to attack us..

After at least 100 from now we can reach 2 trillion $$$ with current bread of corrupt politicians and you mean Pakistan have an ICBM currently than you live in your fairy tales and wishful thinking Pakistan doesn't need an ICBM currently understand bro

 

[Awan68]

Currently......... and the economy is on track again 15 yrs and we will be a 2 trillion dollar economy no problem, u cant hold a country with 200 million people back unless that country is terrorist riddena dn we solved that problem with zarb didnt we??

After at least 100 from now we can reach 2 trillion $$$ with current bread of corrupt politicians and you mean Pakistan have an ICBM currently than you live in your fairy tales and wishful thinking Pakistan doesn't need an ICBM currently understand bro

 

[The Accountant]

free mein party :-/ ...test hoa nai

Sir test tu huwa hoga probably it is not announced like we did not announced babar 3 ...

But ager nahi b huwa tu party on increase in sale of burnol at the neighbours ... so party tu bnti ha ...

Sir you also join