What's new

Pakistan Leads South Asia in Innovation Efficiency

RiazHaq

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
6,611
Reaction score
70
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
While Pakistan fares badly, ranking 103 on a list of 125 nations, on CII-INSEAD Global Index of Innovation for 2011, it is included among the top 10 countries for the Innovation Efficiency sub-Index. These countries are Côte d’Ivoire, Nigeria, China, Pakistan, Moldova, Sweden, Brazil, Argentina, India, and Bangladesh.

This places Pakistan in 4th place on CII-Insead's Global innovation efficiency sub-index, 5 places ahead of India in 9th place, according to Economic Times of India:

India has improved its ranking in the global Innovation Efficiency Index to 9th position in 2011 from 101th last year on factors like political stability, R&D, market and business sophistication, according to a study.

Surprisingly, Pakistan was placed ahead of India at 4th position, the CII-INSEAD study said.

However, India has slipped on its ranking in the Global Innovation Index to 62nd position out of 125 countries in 2011 from 56th last year while Switzerland was at the top,

It said that a lot of Indian talent is returning home to the country and the youth in urban India are now more global than ever, "and they are quite in tune with new technologies, even ahead of the curve in many cases, as early adapters".

"Multinational corporations are making large investments in R&D outside of their headquarter countries, setting up R&D sites in low-cost emerging countries such as China and India to access global talent and take advantage of their proximity to target markets," the report said.

Indian major players such as Tata, Godrej, and Mahindras are shifting their focus towards the rapidly expanding middle-income group of customers by coming up with frugal innovations, keeping in mind the price sensitivity of Indian consumers, it said.

Pakistan Ahead of India in Innovation Efficiency - PakAlumni Worldwide: The Global Social Network
 
.
But India is not South Asia, Please do not change thread titles that too for articles from blogs.
 
. . . .
But India is not South Asia, Please do not change thread titles that too for articles from blogs.

you mean India is not in South Asia?

then where it is? as far as i know this is South Asia

south_asia_map1232517834.gif
 
. .
There nothing written abt Pakistan in the blog. How can it be more ranking than Afghanistan, forget abt India.
 
.
Just so that we understand this right.. Following is the framework of this study
The Global Innovation Index 2011 (GII) relies on two sub-indices, the Innovation Input Sub-Index and the Innovation Output Sub-Index, each built around pillars.

Five input pillars capture elements of the national economy that enable innovative activities: (1) Institutions, (2) Human capital and research, (3) Infrastructure, (4) Market sophistication, and (5) Business sophistication. Two output pillars capture actual evidence of innovation outputs: (6) Scientific outputs and (7) Creative outputs.

Four measures are then calculated:

The Innovation Input Sub-Index is the simple average of the first five pillar scores.
The Innovation Output Sub- Index is the simple average of the last two pillar scores.

The overall GII is the simple average of the Input and Output Sub-Indices.

The Innovation Efficiency Index is the ratio of the Output Sub- Index over the Input Sub-Index.

So in essence the efficiency score is a ratio of innovation output to innovation input.. Now taking the case of Pakistan and India (that we love to do on this forum), lets compare the 2011 scores in contrast with 2010

From 2010 to 2011, India's Innovation Output score jumped from 2.37 to 3.26 (38%) where as Input scores dropped by a marginal 4% (statistically insignificant as under 5%). Which indicates that the innovation output is going up where as the environment encouraging the innovation is staying more of less same

However in case of Pakistan, while the innovation output score went up by 20 %, the Innovation input score dropped by a whopping 15%. Which means that the environment encouraging Innovation is deteriorating significantly in Pakistan. And since this score is the denominator in calculating the efficiency index, the score on that has shot up for Pakistan.

From where I look, this is actually a bad thing and not something to celebrate..
 
.
Global Innovation Index - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
.
Positively ranked countries
.
Rank Country Overall Innovation
Inputs
Innovation
Performance
1 Singapore 2.45 2.89 2.01
2 Switzerland 2.16 1.52 2.75
3 South Korea 2.15 1.75 2.55
4 Iceland 2.11 2.21 2.01
5 Finland 2.02 2.01 2.02
6 Hong Kong 1.82 1.77 1.85
7 Ireland 1.81 1.78 1.84
8 Japan 1.80 1.28 2.25
9 United States 1.66 1.16 2.16
10 Sweden 1.56 1.25 1.88
11 Netherlands 1.54 1.40 1.55
12 Denmark 1.52 1.55 1.49
13 Luxembourg 1.52 1.02 2.03
14 Israel 1.44 1.34 1.43
15 Canada 1.36 1.39 1.32
16 United
Kingdom 1.35 1.33 1.37
17 Austria 1.16 1.16 1.12
18 Norway 1.15 1.16 1.11
19 France 1.06 1.17 0.96
20 Spain 1.03 1.02 1.03
21 China 1.03 0.06 1.96
22 Malaysia 0.96 0.89 1.01
23 Australia 0.93 0.89 1.05
24 Estonia 0.91 1.50 0.25
25 Belgium 0.86 0.85 0.79
26 Germany 0.81 0.79 0.84
27 New Zealand 0.77 0.79 0.69
28 Cyprus 0.63 0.64 0.56
29 Portugal 0.60 0.92 0.22
30 Qatar 0.52 1.02 0.02
31 Hungary 0.51 0.80 0.18
32 Malta 0.39 0.24 0.54
33 Slovenia 0.37 0.47 0.24
34 Czech
Republic 0.34 0.88 -0.10
35 South Africa 0.33 0.15 0.47
36 Bahrain 0.27 0.78 -0.26
37 Chile 0.24 0.36 0.04
38 Italy 0.21 0.16 0.24
39 Slovakia 0.19 0.72 -0.31
40 Tunisia 0.16 0.64 -0.32
41 Greece 0.12 0.02 0.22
42 Latvia 0.11 0.36 -0.12
-- Lithuania 0.11 0.64 -0.40
44 India 0.09 0.12 0.04
-- Thailand 0.09 -0.24 0.36
46 Kuwait 0.08 0.64 -0.36
 
.
Global Innovation Index - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
.
Negatively ranked countries
.
.
Rank Country Overall Innovation
Inputs
Innovation
Performance
51 Russia -0.09 -0.02 -0.16
52 Saudi
Arabia -0.12 0.57 -0.79
53 Poland -0.13 0.22 -0.45
54 Philippines -0.15 -0.64 0.36
55 Oman -0.15 0.27 -0.56
56 Jordan -0.15 -0.04 -0.26
57 Mexico -0.16 0.11 -0.42
58 Turkey -0.21 0.15 -0.55
59 Lesotho -0.22 -1.01 0.59
60 Kazakhstan -0.23 -0.51 0.07
61 Romania -0.29 0.22 -0.77
62 Costa Rica -0.39 -0.57 -0.18
63 Panama -0.43 -0.48 -0.34
64 Ukraine -0.45 -0.13 -0.73
65 Egypt -0.47 -0.46 -0.43
66 Botswana -0.47 -0.50 -0.40
67 Albania -0.49 -0.58 -0.34
68 Azerbaijan -0.54 -0.48 -0.54
69 Sri Lanka -0.56 -0.61 -0.46
70 Morocco -0.57 -0.55 -0.54
71 Indonesia -0.57 -0.63 -0.46
72 Brazil -0.59 -0.62 -0.51
73 Vietnam -0.65 -1.09 -0.16
74 Colombia -0.66 -0.95 -0.30
75 Armenia -0.66 -0.75 -0.52
76 Macedonia -0.68 -0.13 -1.17
77 Georgia -0.72 -0.48 -0.88
78 Ethiopia -0.75 -1.16 -0.27
79 Jamaica -0.75 -0.72 -0.72
80 El Salvador -0.77 -0.59 -0.88
81 Kyrgyzstan -0.78 -0.54 -0.95
82 Honduras -0.79 -0.64 -0.85
83 Moldova -0.80 -0.24 -1.28
.
84 Pakistan -0.82 -1.04 -0.51
.
85 Algeria -0.83 -0.87 -0.70
86 Paraguay -0.89 -0.63 -1.07
.
.
.
Now mr. Haq are you still going to say pakistan is ranked above india in innovation index
 
.
Global Innovation Index 2011 - Switzerland ranks first among 125 economies on innovation levels
.
Global Innovation Index 2011 - Switzerland ranks first among 125 economies on innovation levels.
.
Released jointly by INSEAD and its Global
Innovation Index 2011 edition Knowledge
Partners, Alcatel-Lucent, Booz & Company, the
Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), and the
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
INSEAD, the leading international business school,
today announced the findings of The Global
Innovation Index (GII) 2011 edition. Switzerland
topped this year's GII ranking, gaining three spots
from its position in last year’s GII. Sweden and
Singapore follow in the 2nd and 3rd positions,
respectively. Joining INSEAD as Knowledge
Partners for the report were Alcatel-Lucent, Booz
& Company, the Confederation of Indian Industry
(CII), and the World Intellectual Property
Organization (WIPO), a specialized agency of the
United Nations....,....
..The five Nordic economies—Sweden (2nd),
Finland (5th), Denmark (6th), Iceland (11th), and
Norway (18th)—have very strong performances
globally as well as regionally. Within the European
Union (EU), the Netherlands and the UK are in the
top 10, followed by Germany (12th), Ireland (13th),
Luxembourg (17th), and Austria (19th) in the top
20.
The GII includes 16 economies from the Middle
East and North Africa, of which two—Israel (14th)
and Qatar (26th)—are ranked among the top 30;
both high-income economies. Among Sub-
Saharan African economies, Mauritius (53rd
overall) achieves the top regional spot while
South Africa (59th) is the runner-up. Ghana
comes next at position 70, and ranked first
among economies classified as low-income, all
regions combined.
In Latin America and the Caribbean, Chile comes
first (ranked 38th), followed by Costa Rica (45th)
and Brazil (47th) among the top 50.
Of the four economies from South Asia in the GII, India is ranked 62nd overall, followed by Sri Lanka (82nd), Bangladesh (97th), and Pakistan
(105th).

.
.
.
I hope you got the 2011 rank list now .
So please stop posting BS articles which dont have any proof other then your written blog.
 
.
Global Innovation Index 2011 - Switzerland ranks first among 125 economies on innovation levels
.
Global Innovation Index 2011 - Switzerland ranks first among 125 economies on innovation levels.
.
Released jointly by INSEAD and its Global
Innovation Index 2011 edition Knowledge
Partners, Alcatel-Lucent, Booz & Company, the
Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), and the
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
INSEAD, the leading international business school,
today announced the findings of The Global
Innovation Index (GII) 2011 edition. Switzerland
topped this year's GII ranking, gaining three spots
from its position in last year’s GII. Sweden and
Singapore follow in the 2nd and 3rd positions,
respectively. Joining INSEAD as Knowledge
Partners for the report were Alcatel-Lucent, Booz
& Company, the Confederation of Indian Industry
(CII), and the World Intellectual Property
Organization (WIPO), a specialized agency of the
United Nations....,....
..The five Nordic economies—Sweden (2nd),
Finland (5th), Denmark (6th), Iceland (11th), and
Norway (18th)—have very strong performances
globally as well as regionally. Within the European
Union (EU), the Netherlands and the UK are in the
top 10, followed by Germany (12th), Ireland (13th),
Luxembourg (17th), and Austria (19th) in the top
20.
The GII includes 16 economies from the Middle
East and North Africa, of which two—Israel (14th)
and Qatar (26th)—are ranked among the top 30;
both high-income economies. Among Sub-
Saharan African economies, Mauritius (53rd
overall) achieves the top regional spot while
South Africa (59th) is the runner-up. Ghana
comes next at position 70, and ranked first
among economies classified as low-income, all
regions combined.
In Latin America and the Caribbean, Chile comes
first (ranked 38th), followed by Costa Rica (45th)
and Brazil (47th) among the top 50.
Of the four economies from South Asia in the GII, India is ranked 62nd overall, followed by Sri Lanka (82nd), Bangladesh (97th), and Pakistan
(105th).

.
.
.
I hope you got the 2011 rank list now .
So please stop posting BS articles which dont have any proof other then your written blog.

So basically you're saying that "The Economic Times" (a reliable Indian source) is lying:

India moves up to No.9 on global Innovation Efficiency Index - The Economic Times

NEW DELHI: India has improved its ranking in the global Innovation Efficiency Index to 9th position in 2011 from 101th last year on factors like political stability, R&D, market and business sophistication, according to a study.

Surprisingly, Pakistan was placed ahead of India at 4th position, the CII-INSEAD study said.
 
. .
So basically you're saying that "The Economic Times" (a reliable Indian source) is lying:

India moves up to No.9 on global Innovation Efficiency Index - The Economic Times
.
.
I am not talking about a single parameter but all the parameter base as a hole.
And also if you talk about innovation efficiency you must read this post by.
Just so that we understand this right.. Following is the framework of this study


So in essence the efficiency score is a ratio of innovation output to innovation input.. Now taking the case of Pakistan and India (that we love to do on this forum), lets compare the 2011 scores in contrast with 2010

From 2010 to 2011, India's Innovation Output score jumped from 2.37 to 3.26 (38%) where as Input scores dropped by a marginal 4% (statistically insignificant as under 5%). Which indicates that the innovation output is going up where as the environment encouraging the innovation is staying more of less same

However in case of Pakistan, while the innovation output score went up by 20 %, the Innovation input score dropped by a whopping 15%. Which means that the environment encouraging Innovation is deteriorating significantly in Pakistan. And since this score is the denominator in calculating the efficiency index, the score on that has shot up for Pakistan.

From where I look, this is actually a bad thing and not something to celebrate..


.
To under stand what i am talking about.
To mr. Haq i have to say only that much that- 'half truth are more dangerous then lies.'
so please post full analysis. Thanks.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom