What's new

Pakistan Issues Another NOTAM Warning

. .
The Shaheen 3 was done at the time that mofo biden was taking oath! Is this another test to send a message to that defence secretary? or the yankee establishment?
tenor.gif

Underwater launch platform. India used one for their test a while back.
Yes. They had a submarine suited for the task. Do we?
 
. . .
There is a pattern. If we look closely.


Pakistan Launched first Babur-2 Upgraded LACM on December 14, 2016

" The missile incorporates advanced aerodynamics and avionics that can strike targets both at land and sea with high accuracy,” the ISPR said. "


Immediately followed by

Pakistan fires 'first submarine-launched nuclear-capable missile' - 9 January 2017



Now January 2020 Pattern

We know Ababeel Warheads are most probably the modfied warheads of Shaheen 3

So Pakistan first tested the upgraded warheads on Shaheen 3 on 20th January 2020



Immediately followed by an Ababeel 2 test ? Since Flt test aimed @ revalidating various design & tech parameters of weapon system has been done and warhead can be used on extended Ababeel 2 ?
 
.
Okay, seems that this needs to be cleared up pronto, I have talked to Detresfa via DM's and this is a fake doctored image of a Previous test that was conducted in the Bay of Bengal. The NOTAM too is fake as well, here is the original image. @waz
Have sent a message to PDN for giving out wrong information, however another source claimed on similar note Two days earlier.


Pakistan ARMY Video clip 2021

23crS JasnucldarfaytoeSS aupstod nnnso15:rei3d3eo ·

Pakistan Army will give another great good news to the nation from 27 January to 30 January


 
. .
Can you give a rough estimate about possible range of Ababeel 2? Is it possible to increase range from 2200 to 3300 just after one single test?

2500-3000 KM based on the upgrades they verified in the S-3 Latest test. Ababeel is based on Shaheen 3. So they might have tested the upgraded fuel, engine motors, Guidance systems, Weight reduction with use of composite engine motors on Shaheen 3 and in parallel will be using similar upgrades on Ababeell. A cost effective project management technicque

Just as Babur-2 ( Babur-1B) and Babur 3. 3 weeks apart, which showed Such Programs run in parallel and share the similar tech
 
.
Have sent a message to PDN for giving out wrong information, however another source claimed on similar note Two days earlier.


Pakistan ARMY Video clip 2021

23crS JasnucldarfaytoeSS aupstod nnnso15:rei3d3eo ·




As far as i know there is no authentic information and this dude here is just claiming out of his behind.

However, i will say this and PLEASE do not misconstrue this in any way. Detresfa says there MAY , be a test on the 26th or the 27th near Gwadar. The reason why he hasn't tweeted it out is due to the uncertainty regarding it.
 
Last edited:
.
I thought I recognized that coast line. It looks like Bay of Bengal:
View attachment 710440

Especially since Chagi isnt on the coast.

Anyway, the NOTAM might be genuine but this picture looks suspect to me unless someone can explain it to me.

true

Chaghi is not on coastline
 
.
2500-3000 KM based on the upgrades they verified in the S-3 Latest test. Ababeel is based on Shaheen 3. So they might have tested the upgraded fuel, engine motors, Guidance systems, Weight reduction with use of composite engine motors on Shaheen 3 and in parallel will be using similar upgrades on Ababeell. A cost effective project management technicque

Just as Babur-2 ( Babur-1B) and Babur 3. 3 weeks apart, which showed Such Programs run in parallel and share the similar tech
What's the average yield of the single Ababeel MIRV ?
Are these maneuverable?
 
.
If this NOTAM is true, then we'll know by the end of this week if this is another Shaheen-3 or an Ababeel...fingers crossed, go Ababeel!!!
 
.
Wow that is a great news.
Shaheen3 has over 5000 Km range. but as always this time too, it was fired at a high angle to reduce the actual range.
I think it would be Ababeel to get the both of our principal enemies in range comprehensively.
 
.
.
Back
Top Bottom