What's new

Pakistan is Not Deterred By Us Says Indian Defence Analyst

Pravin S. had to use his words carefully. He is already hounded by jingoistic elements inside India for even suggesting that Pakistan is not a cake walk for India. So he used 'overwhelm' carefully, implying that, yes, India can 'win' against Pakistan but that won't a total victory. If he was living in a more tolerant society, he would have outright admitted that India cannot defeat Pakistan even in a conventional war. Musharraf has often said that, for a defensive war, Pakistan only needs 1/3rd of India's resources to counter an aggressive war from India.

The Hindutva think with their heart, not their heads. They think god is on their side. That beating Pakistan is a catwalk. They don't think about the means or how Pakistan will react, including a realistic scenario of nuclear weapons. Nor do they think that the end result of any war between the two can end with the disintegration of either country! That's how devastating war between the two countries will turn out.

The military planners on both sides know the exact reality of a war between the two countries. Suffice to say: India launched the Balakot strike in Feb. 2019 in dark while Pakistan replied back in broad day light.

My views on Balakot are different compared to most Indians, especially the pro-Modi types. I still think it was a political calculation to help BJP in the elections. It was effective, in my opinion, but it came at a cost of damaging the credibility of the IAF and India's military capacity.
 
.
Its been over a year FGS. Let it go already. Kafi mazai lai liye. Hun jaan chaddo
 
. . .
What an ambiguous statement. They need to be precise on what "overwhelm" means. What will war will look with Pakistan? What's the objective? And can there be any war with Pakistan that will not include tactical nuclear weapons?

Too many questions...

Two front war, answer to all the questions.
So India can be toasted at both ends.
 
.
so according to this analyst what Pakistan did on 27 Feb was an act of military aggression and Indian didn't have the will to retaliate. But what do you call Indian Action on 26? What was that supposed to be. It was an attack , an act of war. He somehow have made Pakistan responsible for all this drama. No doubt it was a master stroke of Modi to win election but he misjudged what will happen in return. He senior military leadership also failed to access the retaliation bit. In one video i saw Modi was discussing how he gave IAF the suggestion to use Cloud cover to attack.
attacking and bombing india at mornign 10am was a super shot :lol:
No doubt. It was indeed.
Two front war, answer to all the questions.
So India can be toasted at both ends.
Its more like Indians fantasy. They have been yapping for too long about two front war. Indians couldn't handle Chinese with Sticks how would they handle 2 front war with real weapons.
 
.
The Hindutva think with their heart, not their heads. They think god is on their side. That beating Pakistan is a catwalk. They don't think about the means or how Pakistan will react, including a realistic scenario of nuclear weapons. Nor do they think that the end result of any war between the two can end with the disintegration of either country! That's how devastating war between the two countries will turn out.



My views on Balakot are different compared to most Indians, especially the pro-Modi types. I still think it was a political calculation to help BJP in the elections. It was effective, in my opinion, but it came at a cost of damaging the credibility of the IAF and India's military capacity.

The interoperability of the Pak Army and the PLA has been increasing day by day with full support and backing from China's military and civilian capabilities plus the Pak Army is extremely battle hardened since the 1980's Soviet Afghan war to the recent war on terror Operation Zarb-e-Azb, Pak Army might not have fancy gadgets like the Rafales and the S400 but what we do have are extremely well integrated, well trained and well oiled machines to the fullest extent, the 30 odd new Rafales would take at least 5 years to be as well integrated as the JF-17 is with the PAF and immediately after these 30 Rafales induction they will be facing 200+ Block 3 JF-17s with BVR capabilities backed by the 70 odd F-16s.
 
.
The Hindutva think with their heart, not their heads. They think god is on their side. That beating Pakistan is a catwalk. They don't think about the means or how Pakistan will react, including a realistic scenario of nuclear weapons. Nor do they think that the end result of any war between the two can end with the disintegration of either country! That's how devastating war between the two countries will turn out.

My views on Balakot are different compared to most Indians, especially the pro-Modi types. I still think it was a political calculation to help BJP in the elections. It was effective, in my opinion, but it came at a cost of damaging the credibility of the IAF and India's military capacity.

Bravo for your honesty!! India seriously needs dissenting voices when it comes to foreign policy. That will serve the Indian interests better. Any 'Baghdad Bob' machismo will not help.
 
.
Its been over a year FGS. Let it go already. Kafi mazai lai liye. Hun jaan chaddo

na2-WswOM36-xfm_74QEVOEEeBTNLI89uic03GHPHkphd_4g-ufgwrvDYvTmCSpUGzZ0w3uEzp8FjNLWGO91qos5RUHhNogNQARnJhKFpu-lm8SFyeQ8BxK0UGV4Tq_RdAfw=w220-h180
 
.
Deep down in our hearts we Pakistanis know the Indians are the most COWARDLY nation on earth.
I think you forgot about pair of balls...
Cowards are those who back stab... While talking about Peace army PM level and waging war at Kargil.... Pak is has great standing as most trusted country...

we are not deterred but paying heavy price
You can wakeup ppl who are sleeping not the ones who are acting...
Price is development and honour... Every year you spend considerable effort to manage funding of repayment of loans...

Two front war, answer to all the questions.
So India can be toasted at both ends.
Still you hope China will wage full blown war with India....
 
.
Pakistan is neither detered by United states nor you (indians) you begin it we shall end it
 
.
Still you hope China will wage full blown war with India....

Why would we hope!!

56er has to make one single mistake and war is upon you. Both China and Pakistan are waiting for that chance.
Why you think Modi et al, preferred to lose territory rather than stand with dignity!!

Coward Indians, good to kill innocent in Kashmiris and Indian Muslims in 25/30/50 on 1 attacks.
Utter cowards.
 
Last edited:
. .
Pakistan has a large, fairly well and more importantly battle hardened military. There’s no scenario which sees it overwhelmed or taking losses at a very fast and unsustainable rate.
If you look at the bulk of conflicts on the past 40 years they have been between foes where this is a large disparity. Few envisage fighting a war with an enemy that can hit very hard back.
Think of the scenario with the biggest guy in the area v the second biggest. Sure there’s some tangles here and there but neither really commit to an all our ‘winner takes all scenario’. Sure it’s a simple way of looking at it but apt.
 
.
India can throw a million soldiers at trying to fight in the mountains, and fail miserably while the bulk of the Pak army will be sitting in the middle of Rajasthan and East Punjab.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom