Super Falcon
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2008
- Messages
- 15,816
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Do she has any morality left
Pakistan is a Defeated Force - Bangladesh PM Haseena
- Thread starter Hassan Guy
- Start date
T-Rex
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2008
- Messages
- 9,989
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
You do not know what RAW is. RAW has not left any avenue open for her ever to go against india. She's simply a puppet.
fallstuff
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2009
- Messages
- 9,441
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
She changed her positions to her convenience a number of times. Some of the cheerleading she is doing now is reciprocal as India was standing by her following the controversial last election.
There are lot of infrastructural work going on, India creates sh*t load of problems through proxies, case n point " Srilanka."
We need a few good years of uninterrupted infrastructural development.
Additionally as I stated before trade and travel between BD and Pakistan is very little, there is no love lost by either side. She is just trolling Pakistan as asked by India !!!!
There are lot of infrastructural work going on, India creates sh*t load of problems through proxies, case n point " Srilanka."
We need a few good years of uninterrupted infrastructural development.
Additionally as I stated before trade and travel between BD and Pakistan is very little, there is no love lost by either side. She is just trolling Pakistan as asked by India !!!!
Stephen Cohen
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2014
- Messages
- 8,456
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
Why does Pakistan support the people who are being Hanged for 1971 crimes
That really hurts Bangladesh ; India need not do anything to drive a wedge between
Pakistan and Bangladesh
fallstuff
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2009
- Messages
- 9,441
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
I think its not how much RAW controls her, but how far she lets them in to her convenience.
Jamaat is an insignificant player in BD politics. They never get more than 5% of the vote in any general election. I am not sure why hanging these guys irks Pakistan, their act maybe geared toward domestic audience.
Jamaat was allowed back in politics not because of Pakistan but because of ME influence. Zia had to kiss the ME behind as he had millions of mouth to feed and millions more unemployed to put to work in ME.
The mad loyal women was referring to her Fathers in RAW.
I S I
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2015
- Messages
- 9,673
- Reaction score
- -32
- Country
- Location
Damn crazy feminists.
Banglar Bir
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2006
- Messages
- 7,805
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Bangladesh Just Became a Vassal State
Sheikh Hasina’s crackdown on dissent leaves her government over reliant on Delhi’s support.
By Esam Sohail
October 04, 2016
While the excuse was the usual one of “interference in internal affairs,” Bangladesh’s perfectly choreographed dovetailing to India’s refusal to attend the Islamabad South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) conference removed any doubt remaining about the relationship between those two neighbors.
To put it charitably, Bangladesh under the Sheikh Hasina regime is far closer to the stature of Bhutan and Maldives vis-à-vis India than to, say, pluckier Nepal and prickly Sri Lanka. Under the current Bangladeshi government, the relationship between Dhaka and Delhi has steadily evolved from being that of two theoretically sovereign and equal nations to one of client and vassal in the image of the former communist countries of the Eastern Bloc and the erstwhile USSR. Very similar dynamics are at work as well.
After securing a comfortable victory in Bangladesh’s last free elections in 2008, Hasina quickly moved to ensure – like the Communists in the aftermath of the immediate post-World War II elections in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, and East Germany – that the painfully built up democratic institutions would never again be used to end her Awami League party’s rule.
To that effect, she first broke long the long-held tradition of respecting seniority and appointed her sympathizers to the highest bench of the judiciary. She quickly followed by stacking the technically neutral Election Commission with known cronies and non-entities.
The coup de grace came in 2011 when her parliament, where floor crossing results in cancellation of membership, dutifully got rid of the linchpin of free elections in Bangladesh since 1990: the neutral, election-time caretaker government provision. Not surprisingly, the Supreme Court, by then fully staffed by Hasina’s hand-picked men, was persuaded to give a judgment against the constitutional amendment that had created the caretaker provision. As to how a constitutional Amendment, approved by an internationally supervised popular referendum, could be “unconstitutional” is best left up to the chicanery of judges who have much more in common with the “people’s” judges of the USSR than with those in independent judiciaries.
With the results of any future elections not in doubt and the judiciary suitably tamed, the Awami League government moved decisively to make all dissent very costly, without being so overt as to look askance to European and North American donors.
Newspapers and television stations deemed not suitably obeisant to the concept of “chetona” (the Awami ideology that mixes a cult of Hasina’s family with a carefully crafted historical narrative) were shut down. Several prominent newsmen were sent to jail where some still rot without any judicial verdicts against them. New laws on cyber crimes and defamation were hurriedly passed to make any negative reference to members of the ruling family or to the ruling party’s historical narrative a criminal offense.
By the time the next national elections came around in 2014, the results were never in any doubt and the main secular opposition parties saw no point in contesting them. Subsequent elections to local government bodies followed the typical pattern where any opposition figures brave enough to contest or journalists courageous enough to report the irregularities were either beaten up by the Awami League-affiliated Bangladesh Chhatra League (BCL) or roughed up by the police.
By early 2015, it was quite clear that the only parts of organized society not controlled by the ruling party were a couple of professional and trade bodies, and some human rights related NGOs. Using organizational elections in the same manner as the national ones, that year the journalists union, the national bar council, and the apex chamber of commerce were all brought under the control of pro-Awami League executives while the last two remaining non-Awami League mayors of major cities were jailed by the regime. All funds coming to NGOs from abroad were required, by new regulations, to be escrowed in government accounts and released only on showing that their educational or human rights work was not a threat to the regime’s sinecure. As if to send a message to the remaining independent journalists, the government orchestrated 88 separate defamation cases against the editor of the premier English newspaper Daily Star. (That the said editor had long been a vocal proponent of the Awami League narrative was not enough to balance against his occasional critique of the regime’s election-time hijinks.)
Bangladesh’s second experiment with pluralist democracy, which began in 1990, is dead. Yet Hasina knows her country and its people well enough to realize how volatile 160 million Bengalis in a 56,000 square mile parcel of land can be. In the absence of any electoral legitimacy, her autocracy is undergirded by the troika of formal security services, which have become very adept at making key dissenters and their family members “disappear”; BCL, which regularly uses street violence to break up any attempts at non-Awami League rallies and processions; and the benevolence of the Narendra Modi government in India. The most important of this troika is, of course, the last one mentioned: with the Obama administration having subcontracted most of its South Asia policy to New Delhi, the mandarins at South Block are both the sword and the shield of the Hasina regime.
For Dhaka to have a foreign policy different than its patron in Delhi would have been a surprise. By meekly following India’s lead in pulling out of the now-postponed SAARC Summit, Bangladesh triggered no surprise.
Esam Sohail is an educational research analyst and college lecturer of social sciences who regularly contributes opinion pieces to the Bangladeshi press. He writes from Kansas, USA.
Sheikh Hasina’s crackdown on dissent leaves her government over reliant on Delhi’s support.
By Esam Sohail
October 04, 2016
While the excuse was the usual one of “interference in internal affairs,” Bangladesh’s perfectly choreographed dovetailing to India’s refusal to attend the Islamabad South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) conference removed any doubt remaining about the relationship between those two neighbors.
To put it charitably, Bangladesh under the Sheikh Hasina regime is far closer to the stature of Bhutan and Maldives vis-à-vis India than to, say, pluckier Nepal and prickly Sri Lanka. Under the current Bangladeshi government, the relationship between Dhaka and Delhi has steadily evolved from being that of two theoretically sovereign and equal nations to one of client and vassal in the image of the former communist countries of the Eastern Bloc and the erstwhile USSR. Very similar dynamics are at work as well.
After securing a comfortable victory in Bangladesh’s last free elections in 2008, Hasina quickly moved to ensure – like the Communists in the aftermath of the immediate post-World War II elections in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, and East Germany – that the painfully built up democratic institutions would never again be used to end her Awami League party’s rule.
To that effect, she first broke long the long-held tradition of respecting seniority and appointed her sympathizers to the highest bench of the judiciary. She quickly followed by stacking the technically neutral Election Commission with known cronies and non-entities.
The coup de grace came in 2011 when her parliament, where floor crossing results in cancellation of membership, dutifully got rid of the linchpin of free elections in Bangladesh since 1990: the neutral, election-time caretaker government provision. Not surprisingly, the Supreme Court, by then fully staffed by Hasina’s hand-picked men, was persuaded to give a judgment against the constitutional amendment that had created the caretaker provision. As to how a constitutional Amendment, approved by an internationally supervised popular referendum, could be “unconstitutional” is best left up to the chicanery of judges who have much more in common with the “people’s” judges of the USSR than with those in independent judiciaries.
With the results of any future elections not in doubt and the judiciary suitably tamed, the Awami League government moved decisively to make all dissent very costly, without being so overt as to look askance to European and North American donors.
Newspapers and television stations deemed not suitably obeisant to the concept of “chetona” (the Awami ideology that mixes a cult of Hasina’s family with a carefully crafted historical narrative) were shut down. Several prominent newsmen were sent to jail where some still rot without any judicial verdicts against them. New laws on cyber crimes and defamation were hurriedly passed to make any negative reference to members of the ruling family or to the ruling party’s historical narrative a criminal offense.
By the time the next national elections came around in 2014, the results were never in any doubt and the main secular opposition parties saw no point in contesting them. Subsequent elections to local government bodies followed the typical pattern where any opposition figures brave enough to contest or journalists courageous enough to report the irregularities were either beaten up by the Awami League-affiliated Bangladesh Chhatra League (BCL) or roughed up by the police.
By early 2015, it was quite clear that the only parts of organized society not controlled by the ruling party were a couple of professional and trade bodies, and some human rights related NGOs. Using organizational elections in the same manner as the national ones, that year the journalists union, the national bar council, and the apex chamber of commerce were all brought under the control of pro-Awami League executives while the last two remaining non-Awami League mayors of major cities were jailed by the regime. All funds coming to NGOs from abroad were required, by new regulations, to be escrowed in government accounts and released only on showing that their educational or human rights work was not a threat to the regime’s sinecure. As if to send a message to the remaining independent journalists, the government orchestrated 88 separate defamation cases against the editor of the premier English newspaper Daily Star. (That the said editor had long been a vocal proponent of the Awami League narrative was not enough to balance against his occasional critique of the regime’s election-time hijinks.)
Bangladesh’s second experiment with pluralist democracy, which began in 1990, is dead. Yet Hasina knows her country and its people well enough to realize how volatile 160 million Bengalis in a 56,000 square mile parcel of land can be. In the absence of any electoral legitimacy, her autocracy is undergirded by the troika of formal security services, which have become very adept at making key dissenters and their family members “disappear”; BCL, which regularly uses street violence to break up any attempts at non-Awami League rallies and processions; and the benevolence of the Narendra Modi government in India. The most important of this troika is, of course, the last one mentioned: with the Obama administration having subcontracted most of its South Asia policy to New Delhi, the mandarins at South Block are both the sword and the shield of the Hasina regime.
For Dhaka to have a foreign policy different than its patron in Delhi would have been a surprise. By meekly following India’s lead in pulling out of the now-postponed SAARC Summit, Bangladesh triggered no surprise.
Esam Sohail is an educational research analyst and college lecturer of social sciences who regularly contributes opinion pieces to the Bangladeshi press. He writes from Kansas, USA.
DeceptiveEagle
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2012
- Messages
- 118
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
We Should thank that those BS are not our part now, just Foot licker of Endia.
Hassan Guy
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2016
- Messages
- 4,892
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Pakistan WAS created for Muslim nationalism, though it has evolved into much more then just that
Gandh brandi
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
- Messages
- 481
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
lol
where's the great pakistani expertise of dissecting false propaganda when you need one.
Not to mention quoting an indian "defence news site", you guys also trust PTI like its your own national news agency, right?
Calling you hypocrites is an insult to hypocrisy itself. Bunch of manipulatable circle-jerk more likely.
@UKBengali, @kobiraaz, @bluesky, @fallstuff and others.
where's the great pakistani expertise of dissecting false propaganda when you need one.
Not to mention quoting an indian "defence news site", you guys also trust PTI like its your own national news agency, right?
Calling you hypocrites is an insult to hypocrisy itself. Bunch of manipulatable circle-jerk more likely.
@UKBengali, @kobiraaz, @bluesky, @fallstuff and others.
Musafir117
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2014
- Messages
- 9,613
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Any one who bark specially false barking
is dog biaaach we never even tolerated our politicians and labeled them So Ye BC kis khet ki muli hai? She want something and we not give her a damn response officially that's her punishment may she rot in hell she burning here in this world as well
abey bangalio rishta karwa dou Modi se haseena mani hui hai.Dr Shaheryar
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2016
- Messages
- 625
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Don't worry your evil support is enough for her. We don't support evil or fake Muslims, Just like ISIL and others.
Irfan Baloch
SENIOR MODERATOR
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2009
- Messages
- 20,975
- Reaction score
- 214
- Country
- Location
of course she has
I mean..the Pakistani force has been outclassed , out matched out turned out.. whatever. by the Hanuman's army that crawled the trees , mines and mountains for miles over miles and para trooped upwards to their invisible helicopters.
No country in a world has a force that can crawl the mines and mountains and even trees and can defy all laws of physics and leave the enemy bewildered I think quantum physics was applied in this strike.
Hasina is completely correct.
Similar threads
- Article
