T90TankGuy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Messages
- 9,427
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
ok course we can have a mature discussion . but first lets start with a source which if i remember the forum rules is a must.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes it is when you have been given the explanation and you still decide to ask the same questions again and again as if some how you will get your desired answer.
mate try to understand you are on an international forum . you have members from different countries . and i assume all are equal...
now when you post a thread saying you are co developing a fighter, is it not the right of other members to ask for proof or a source on which you have based this article?suppose an indian member had posted a thread and given no source the thread would have been deleted . so look at things from our point of view too . if as you say you do not care if we believe you then, either dont post it on a international forum or just ignore us when we ask for proof and are skeptical when you demand recognition.
could you please point out the post no in which the source was given . i shall gladly eat humble pie
There is a saying that one shouldnt underestimate the predictability of stupidity. And my bad I underestimated you.
jft is a mig19 clone
jft is a mig21 clone
jft has no pak input
j10a is so high tech that it wont be exported
paf has no expertese for j10a
paf will never get j10b
j10b is inferior to mki/rafale etc
j10b has pathetic thrust
j10b's rcs is not under 1
pak kamra only overhauls old fighters
pac kamra doesnt have any labs
we need sources as pictures are photoshopped
we dont believe prfessionals on the forum as sources
jft partnership is just like su30 partnership
i wonder which question you are referring to this time? why should we have to defend our position to you ? are we guilty of some crime that you dont take our senior members on their face value? as long as ive seen , the senior members' tidbits mostly come true and they dont have to justify there credibility to us.
well if you feel i am stupid , who am i to contradict you .
but indulge me and do give me the post on which you said there is a source for the claims made on this thread.
jft is a mig19 clone
jft is a mig21 clone
jft has no pak input
j10a is so high tech that it wont be exported
paf has no expertese for j10a
paf will never get j10b
j10b is inferior to mki/rafale etc
j10b has pathetic thrust
j10b's rcs is not under 1
pak kamra only overhauls old fighters
pac kamra doesnt have any labs
we need sources as pictures are photoshopped
we dont believe prfessionals on the forum as sources
jft partnership is just like su30 partnership
i wonder which question you are referring to this time? why should we have to defend our position to you ? are we guilty of some crime that you dont take our senior members on their face value? as long as ive seen , the senior members' tidbits mostly come true and they dont have to justify there credibility to us.
jft is a mig19 clone
jft is a mig21 clone
jft has no pak input
j10a is so high tech that it wont be exported
paf has no expertese for j10a
paf will never get j10b
j10b is inferior to mki/rafale etc
j10b has pathetic thrust
j10b's rcs is not under 1
pak kamra only overhauls old fighters
pac kamra doesnt have any labs
we need sources as pictures are photoshopped
we dont believe prfessionals on the forum as sources
jft partnership is just like su30 partnership
f16 blk52 has no room in future wars
you only have 18 blk52s and all other f16s are of the 80s
our lca m2 can easily take on jft blk1 even if it hasent been made yet
jf17 is not comparable to grippen c/d and f16 blk40 in terms of general capability
jft is a point defence fighter
just replace PAF with IAF,
PAC=HAL
j10b=MKI
JFT with LCA.....viola and you r in LCA thread...
hmmm seems very familiar isnt it ....
how does me asking "if PAC kamra having productn/R&D facility under one roof" qualifies me as troll....
PAC is a huge facility man. Are you deliberately trying to irritate?,,,it is a very big facility. There is not everything under one roof. There are different facilities like F-6 rebuild, mirage rebuild, Production facility, spare facility.
Are you arguing the very exsistence of PAC kamra?
jft is a mig19 clone
jft is a mig21 clone
jft has no pak input
j10a is so high tech that it wont be exported
paf has no expertese for j10a
paf will never get j10b
j10b is inferior to mki/rafale etc
j10b has pathetic thrust
j10b's rcs is not under 1
pak kamra only overhauls old fighters
pac kamra doesnt have any labs
we need sources as pictures are photoshopped
we dont believe prfessionals on the forum as sources
jft partnership is just like su30 partnership
f16 blk52 has no room in future wars
you only have 18 blk52s and all other f16s are of the 80s
our lca m2 can easily take on jft blk1 even if it hasent been made yet
jf17 is not comparable to grippen c/d and f16 blk40 in terms of general capability
jft is a point defence fighter
air refuellers and awacs play an important power projection role for iaf , however in case of paf they are not worthy of mentioning
in the next 5 years all paf fighters will be upgraded from 2nd generation to 4/4.5 generation -- however still they wont stand a chance of inflicting any damage with there stand off weapons
i wonder which question you are referring to this time? why should we have to defend our position to you ? are we guilty of some crime that you dont take our senior members on their face value? as long as ive seen , the senior members' tidbits mostly come true and they dont have to justify there credibility to us.