Wrath
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
- Messages
- 1,750
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
I noticed a lot of anomalies, lack of coordination & integration.
1. Pakistan does not have any thing like US National Intelligence Directorate Where all intelligence from various agencies/Intelligence community are fed & analysed.
2. ISI does brief PM time to time.
3. What is the role of ISI?Does it look strategically around the world or has singular focus on India?Is is responsible for looking at indian military?What are ISI internal wings responsible for?
4. What is the defined role of MI? Does it overlap ISI? Was it responsible and successful to break insurgency and mainstream Balochistan?
5. What does Pakistan's premier civilian agency IB does?
6. Who is responsible for Industrial/Economic espionage as done by China recently and Russia before?
I noticed a lot of anomalies, lack of coordination & integration.
1. Pakistan does not have any thing like US National Intelligence Directorate Where all intelligence from various agencies/Intelligence community are fed & analysed.
2. ISI does brief PM time to time.
3. What is the role of ISI?Does it look strategically around the world or has singular focus on India?Is is responsible for looking at indian military?What are ISI internal wings responsible for?
4. What is the defined role of MI? Does it overlap ISI? Was it responsible and successful to break insurgency and mainstream Balochistan?
5. What does Pakistan's premier civilian agency IB does?
6. Who is responsible for Industrial/Economic espionage as done by China recently and Russia before?
Kindly change the thread title to a question . Remove ( a mess ? ) From title . How did you notice the anomalies and lack of coordination and all , ISI is too secretive so better upgrade your knowledge .
Now answering your questions .
1) Pak doesn't have a defence budget as great as US and it definitely affects the coordination and loopholes are left .
2) Yes ,ISI does brief PM time to time , also warnings are issued but due lack of proper coordination from the civil sector , terrorist attacks happen .
3) Yes , ISI looks globally and at India too . It's internal wings are separate for ME , EU , India and Kashmir .
4) As far as MI and IB are concerned , they don't play a major role . It's ISI most of the time . Yes , ISI has been successful in breaking the lines of BLA , BLF , TTP , PTM and other proxies and RAW agent Kulbhushan Sudheer Yadav .
5) Most of the time IB is used for security of politicians .
6) Don't know about that . ISI have too much greater issues to deal with like India's recent scrapping of Articles which gave a special status to Kashmir and their plans to invade AJK and internal pressures as Student March and Molana's March .