Pakhtoon yum
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2018
- Messages
- 5,532
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Oh, ok. Thank you for the infoAD regts are always attached to such formations.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, ok. Thank you for the infoAD regts are always attached to such formations.
Pakistan Army Indicated A-100 MRL in Artillery Corps. COAS Bajwa was the Chief Guest. A-100 MRL can hit target upto 100KM
View attachment 530768 View attachment 530769 View attachment 530770 View attachment 530771 View attachment 530772 View attachment 530773 View attachment 530774 View attachment 530775
From 2010 and we have more then 250 of these but the news just came out today
It was inducted long ago. But the new which I can see the Rocket in it is the one developed by ROCKETSAN
Agreed 100%.
Pakistani nonchalant narrative of Nasr to neutralize India CSD is so unacceptable.
Use of Nuclear weapons even tactical is no laughing matter. It is still option of last resort and a deterrence. Pakistan should slowly increase and build conventional capacity. JF-17, AEW&C, Type 054, Agosta and chinese SSK, AK MBTs, and other local and acquired systems are good effort. Things will improve with growth in economy.
Excuse my ignorance, but shouldn't something like this be accompanied with air defense systems?
Sir, can you please point to the report or its title.Some time ago, USA had run around 20 scenarios of war between India and Pakistan and in every scenario war turned out to be a Nuclear one. Those were simulated experiments but logic too says, given the military sizes on both sides, and both countries having the ability to launch nuclear strike at each other using multiple means, any future war (small or large) will nevertheless end up getting nuclear.
You prepare for the worst, you hope for the best. I wouldn't be surprised if Pakistan has developed more means to respond and defend itself against Indian agression using all means possible. The more diverse means of attack you have, the more likely you are to keep a second strike capability.
Export to Saudi Arabia?I think they have just completed the ToT and first "all made in Pakistan" battery has been inducted else everyone knows that the system is foreign and old.
I doubt that is number is correct, since Pakistan signed a contract for 36 of them.
Isn't a Rocket Artillery Regt holding 12 A100s each? 48 systems were received from 2011-2013. Anyways, 60 systems till now maybe possible.6 battalions comprising 36 A-100 launchers were received in 2011, then PA made incremental purchases of 1 battalion (i.e. 6 launchers) each year till 2015. So, the number stands at 60 launchers.
Every A-100 regiment is supported by a locating regiment operating SLC-2 in the counter battery role.
The launchers are not manufactured in Pakistan, only the rockets have been localized which means production at POF is imminent.
I could see a scenario for war erupting in the Subcontinent. However there is no scenario where one can predictably say it will be a non nuclear engagement. With the lack of trust between the 2 nations what is to prevent a party noticing a cruise missile coming towards its lands and assume it to be non nuke, wait for it to explode, and respond accordingly??? This is where the problem lies.@graphican
Sir, can you please point to the report or its title.
Having said that, my assessment dont see a nuclear war. It is highly unlikely midi will fare an adventure for election mileage. My prediction it will be Pakistan who will invade India over water. With current capacity of 30 days, and India working tooth and nail to stop river flow to pakistan, Pakistan will have no choice but to invade India and take back Kashmir.
War will be conventional, and Pakistan to make various indigenous systems including all types of autonomous and non-autonomous, tanks, subs, etc. MLR are a great offensive tool. Pakistan should look for GMRLS, and of their own. Not sure if a kit could be added to conventional MRLS. Imported will be very expensive.
Your argument has weight.I could see a scenario for war erupting in the Subcontinent. However there is no scenario where one can predictably say it will be a non nuclear engagement. With the lack of trust between the 2 nations what is to prevent a party noticing a cruise missile coming towards its lands and assume it to be non nuke, wait for it to explode, and respond accordingly??? This is where the problem lies.
A