King Solomon
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2011
- Messages
- 2,990
- Reaction score
- 0
Both pakistan and India will have significant military capability even after a full-scale nuclear exchange.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jingoism rots your brain aeronaut don't take it from us "cabbage" eating Indians take it from your own media you are quick to talk about nukes but realize that they are double edged swords you think that we will stand idly and let you nuke us? in such a horrible scenario all of South Asia would become a nuclear cesspit your grandchildren and their grandchildren would sht and piss strontium-90 is that what you want?
Pakistan Won't Survive A Nuclear War With India - YouTube
India won't survive a thermonuclear attack by Pakistan.
Sorry guy, but India ate grass first to have nuclear weapons since its defeat against china in 1962, so stop picking up on Pakistan. You are just projecting your own deeper thoughts about yourselves.
even back then we could actually afford to develop nukes unlike you guys get your info right buddy
This double edge sword is being piped by you Indians more often , Pakistan never wanted nukes in the first place , thanks to your sick hegemonic minds we had to have them.
The least known part is that the only beneficiary of such a fight would be the USA.
On one hand the American government continues to admit they have found no evidence in Pakistan's support to militants, and on the other hand such loose talk. Americans are just engaged in a smear campaign.
agreed nuclear weapons are no toys neither Pakistan or India would experiment with brinkmanship because the threat of mutually assured destruction is imminent
Einstein put it simply if WW3 is fought with nuclear weapons then WW4 will be fought with sticks and stones.
The OP isn't about Afghan terrorism, it is about Pak support of terrorists against India.
Of which there are plentiful proofs and admissions.
The OP isn't about Afghan terrorism, it is about Pak support of terrorists against India.
Of which there are plentiful proofs and admissions.
So according to you, there is "plentiful proof" of the Pakistani state being responsible for the Mumbai attacks?
Where is this proof?
And why then, is Pakistan still a major ally of NATO in the War on Terrorism?
So according to you, there is "plentiful proof" of the Pakistani state being responsible for the Mumbai attacks?
Where is this proof?
And why then, is Pakistan still a major ally of NATO in the War on Terrorism?