Tank131
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2015
- Messages
- 1,302
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
It's better not to fit Babur CM on these ships, but if needed Babur-3 can be put in VLS (if VLS is installed) because it's smaller then LACM version and have 450km range.
I would never utilize vls space for LACM in this size of ship. For that yoy need something in the 6t range for it to be worth it. So you dont lose space in for Air defense missiles.
Hisar-A has a length of 4m, While Hisar-O is 4,5/4,6m. I think Quad packing Hisar-A is possible inside of launchers because given length parameters are around limits but I don't have any official info about launchers yet.
Hisar-U is officially called as Advanced Long range Air Defence system and There is an illustration which is prepared by Aselsan to introduce their exoatmospheric warhead. I don't know What is the actual capability which is targetted but It seems Aselsan is openly working to develop exoatmospheric engagement capability as an alternative warhead to standart Hisar-U missile.
Pakistan should definitely join this project. They need multilayered air defense network amd with a 600km, 120km, 70km network (where they could even keep their 40km LOMAD Hq-16 instead of Hisar A) they will have an excellent network akin to Iron Dome, David Sling and Arrow 2/3.
But why do most references show Hisar A as a 16km missile (not 70km) amd Hisar O as 40km (not 120km)?
Last edited: