What's new

Pakistan has to vacate Azad Kashmir and GB: India

How about vacating South Tibet, indian occupied J&K, NE states or seven sisters and parts of desert and creeks which belong to Pak, still under indian occupation.

indiaa is an empire of big words...it must thank the British for its creation. And more importantly it must than Pak political class for being incompetent..

Had Pak a comeptent political class there would not have been an inch of its rightful lands, from J&K to Sir Creek, under illlegitimate indian empire's occupation.

This political incompetence of Pak political class gives these hordes of south asian their bragging powers...

One day Pak needs to correct this weakness!!!!!!!!!!

WOW, and who should Pakistan thank ?? British Empire or Indian National Congress??

If not for the U.S involvement in world war, China could still be nothing more than a colony of mighty Imperial Japan. LOL :p:

And regarding the incompetent Positions in Pakistan, remember Pakistan lost most under the eminent leadership of your Military regime (including more than half of its territory) not under politicians. :p:
 
Last edited:
.
Modi crossed LOC

Ah yes, the famous "Surgical strikes"

I cant believe that even after the stunning lack of evidence and complete international embarrassment, that you people are still claiming that it happened.

The real surgical strikes happened when your outposts were pounded to dust, and one of your soldiers was captured.
 
.
Ah yes, the famous "Surgical strikes"

I cant believe that even after the stunning lack of evidence and complete international embarrassment, that you people are still claiming that it happened.

The real surgical strikes happened when your outposts were pounded to dust, and one of your soldiers was captured.
Be happy with whatever you want to believe..... Its a great change of policy for India to declare that they crossed LOC Whenever earlier (both Pakistan and India has been at it earlier) the local commander/units crossed LOC they always denied it.
 
.
The next BJP Prime Minister unlike Modi might attack Pakistan. Its a grave possibility.
First one was Atal-he didnt cross LOC, Modi crossed LOC, the Next BJP PM might just launch a small scale attack on Pakistan like Kargil.
Next Congress leaders might do all the above without declaring.
Its getting in that direction.
We shall welcome that with open arms, wine and roses will fall from the heavens immediately for the next BJP PM (as per your logic) as soon as he will cross the LOC with his mighty army and entire G.B will surrender basking into his grandeur and glory... My sincere advice...never try it. !!!
 
.
Ironically, Pakistan can't even match this sorry looking soldiers, hence J&K is still an Indian state. LOL :p:



What violation of UN resolution are you talking about ?? That is just a resolution, more or less a guidelines, never an obligation on any parties involved. The Kashmir dispute is bilateral between India and Pakistan after Simla agreement and therefor the UN resolutions are as good as dead. Ironically your all weather friend China also acknowledges our claim, I guess they are serious enough. :-)

http://www.radio.gov.pk/18-Mar-2017...spute-between-pakistan-india-through-dialogue



But Simla Agreement of 1972 had effectively killed UNSC resolutions on Kashmir, why I shall explain;

UNSC resolution is just a resolution regarding Kashmir, more like some guidelines. It is non implementable as it was passed under Charter VI.

It is non binding in nature and hence, no obligations. LOL :p:

Simla agreement on the other hand is an agreement and the signatories are obliged to follow it.

There is a lot of difference between a "resolution" and an "agreement" friend. :)

So UNSC Resolutions on KASHMIR is as good as dead now. :)

You need to stop lying. Indians have been talking trash such as 'Simla agreement' have replaced/killed UN resolutions. That is just another Indian lie. How can an agreement between India and Pakistan deprive the people of J&K of their right of self-determination as promised to them by world through UN resolutions? The fact is that due to the lack of progress in implementing UN resolutions, both countries kept using military means to achieve their goals. Through Shimla agreement, both sides agreed to use negotiations to resolve the dispute. But still you have to resolve it according to UN resolutions. Shimla agreement was merely one step in that direction. It does not turn the illegal Indian occupation of J&K in continued violation of UN resolutions into a lawful act. The right of self-determination is still standing above any and every bilateral agreement between Pakistan and India.
 
. .
Be happy with whatever you want to believe..... Its a great change of policy for India to declare that they crossed LOC Whenever earlier (both Pakistan and India has been at it earlier) the local commander/units crossed LOC they always denied it.

 
. .
this is the time to discuss about Kashmir infront of whole world. no matter what India think it depends on Kashmir wishes and we know very well not only Azad Kashmir, GB but also J&k people want to join Pakistan. Union Minister Jitendra singh lied. the dispute between Pakistan and India is only J&K because people of J&K want to join Pakistan not Azad Kashmir and GB want to join India. it is crystal clear.

basically this is the Indian Old trick to slow down the CPEC Progress, but we can easily change J&K in our favor. AK and GB are already in favor of pakistan. now it is the time to involve whole world about J&K.
 
Last edited:
. .
You need to stop lying. Indians have been talking trash such as 'Simla agreement' have replaced/killed UN resolutions. That is just another Indian lie. How can an agreement between India and Pakistan deprive the people of J&K of their right of self-determination as promised to them by world through UN resolutions? The fact is that due to the lack of progress in implementing UN resolutions, both countries kept using military means to achieve their goals. Through Shimla agreement, both sides agreed to use negotiations to resolve the dispute. But still you have to resolve it according to UN resolutions. Shimla agreement was merely one step in that direction. It does not turn the illegal Indian occupation of J&K in continued violation of UN resolutions into a lawful act. The right of self-determination is still standing above any and every bilateral agreement between Pakistan and India.

Oh, really. Now try and convince other countries around the world. Better to start with China. :)

http://www.radio.gov.pk/18-Mar-2017...spute-between-pakistan-india-through-dialogue

Simplying by calling something lie doesn't make it so. Simla Agreement is a reality and UNSC resolutions are non implementable. Period. :)
 
.
I guess the present Indian government is becoming more aggressive on J&K. Asking Pakistan to vacate Kashmir is a welcoming step.
 
. .
this is the time to discuss about Kashmir infront of whole world. no matter what India think it depends on Kashmir wishes and we know very well not only Azad Kashmir, GB but also J&k people want to join Pakistan. Union Minister Jitendra singh lied. the dispute between Pakistan and India is only J&K because people of J&K want to join Pakistan not Azad Kashmir and GB want to join India. it is crystal clear.

basically this is the Indian Old trick to slow down the CPEC Progress, but we can easily change J&K in our favor. AK and GB are already in favor of pakistan. now it is the time to involve whole world about J&K.
Kashmir issue can be settled overnight if people act wisely and declare LOC as IB. People who want to go to Pakistan can move there similarly people who want to move to India can be allowed to do so.
Wishes of people means, nothing. Those people who really wish something they go abroad change their homes and places if they don't like a neighborhood.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom