StraightShooter
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2017
- Messages
- 2,028
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Putting in a motion is simple. it won't pass. He's alone on this.
ok
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Putting in a motion is simple. it won't pass. He's alone on this.
Kashmir has remained a longstanding unresolved issue between the two countries causing acrimony on both side
The only issue of dispute between India and Pakistan as far as Jammu and Kashmir is concerned is the illegal occupation of Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan by Pakistan, the government on Thursday said. Union Minister Jitendra Singh reiterated India’s demand that Pakistan should vacate illegal occupation of these areas.
Singh’s sharp remarks came in response to Pakistan High Commissioner Abdul Basit favouring resolution of Kashmir dispute as per the “aspirations of Kashmiris”.
Basit was speaking at an event at the High Commission at New Delhi on Thursday to mark Pakistan’s national day.
Talking to reporters outside Parliament, Singh said “Today if there is any issue between India and Pakistan on J&K, it is only the illegal occupation by Pakistan, whether it is Azad Kashmir (Azad Kashmir) or Gilgit-Baltistan”.
He also added, “How it can be freed from Pakistan’s occupation and made a part of the Indian republic…that is the only issue now”.
Singh said India’s position has been clear for many years now and in 1994, a resolution (on the issue) was also passed in Parliament which all political parties had supported.
Basit had said the aspirations of people “can be suppressed but not quelled and I hope the struggle of the Kashmiris will prove successful”.
Kashmir has remained a longstanding unresolved issue between the two countries causing acrimony on both sides.
We are waiting. You guys are mighty super power. Just take it
there was a process laid down and involved parties need to agree to that process. as per the process india has legitimate claim and pakistan does not.
it does not matter if a part of the region in kashmir now has muslim majority population as india could also say hindus were a majority in undivided india and pakistan as country itself is illegitimate now.
this is from UK parliament
Early day motion 1107
ANNEXATION OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN BY PAKISTAN AS ITS FIFTH FRONTIER
Session: 2016-17
Date tabled: 23.03.2017
Primary sponsor: Blackman, Bob
Sponsors:
That this House condemns the arbitrary announcement by Pakistan declaring Gilgit-Baltistan as its Fifth Frontier, implying its attempt to annex the already disputed area; notes that Gilgit-Baltistan is a legal and constitutional part of the state of Jammu and Kashmir, India, which is illegally occupied by Pakistan since 1947, and where people are denied their fundamental rights including the right of freedom of expression; further notes the attempts to change the demography of the region in violation of State Subject Ordinance and forcibly and illegally to build the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, which further aggravates and interferes with the disputed territory.
The "process" disintegrated as soon as there was a blood bath across the sub continent
The whole point of Partition was that we didn't want to live with hindus or care or be ruled by your sensibilities
Pakistan was formed as a result and Kashmir as a muslim majority state whose faith, culture and ethnicity was an extention of Pakistan was by rational outcome a part of Pakistan as its people just like all aspiring Pakistanis of the time willed it as well as distancing themselves from hindus.
Forcing because of Indian greed an entire state full of people under a Hindu majority state is the basis of the problem and why South Asia has hostility
No process substitutes the will of Kashmirs wanting to be away from Hindus and part of Pakistan
blood bath started after the decision to divide the country not before and both Hindus and Muslims died in those riots.
And why did the process start? Muslims ruled the subcontinent for "1000 years", did not fight for independence and at the first hint of India attaining independence took help of the British to obtain a country for themselves.
if the plebiscite is so sacrosanct why didn't Muslims take that route for partitioning the country?
anyone talking about plebiscite in Kashmir are hypocritical as there was no plebiscite for the formation of Pakistan in the first place.
The decision to make Pakistan had been taken, the muslims of the sub continent hsd agreed Pakistan was our path as living side by side with hindus was intolerable
Our leaders were smart they understood hindus and understood being a statistical minority to hindus was intolerable
Pakistan wasnt achieved with the help of the British but by the sweat, sacrafices and hard work of muslims
Kashmiris were part and parcel of this
We simply didnt want to live with hindus, nor did we trust them
This should have been respected!!!!!!
Forcing a muslim majority state and people to live under a hindu india was an act of unfathomable stupidity and greed on your part
Simply accepting that we didnt like you and didnt want to live side by side with you meant that the sub continent could have healed after a decade or two and moved on
We are waiting. You guys are mighty super power. Just take it
Exactly my point. How come Hindu Budhist natives of Valley were never oppressed but only Muslims despite no Religious fanatic Hindu ruler or Govt. ever there. Means if the Population wasnt Muslim population they would have lived just and comfortable, is it ?? Everyone knows that Pakistan definitely is a champion of freedom Bangladesh and Balochistan to name a few. Actually its like how come Hindus don't have that Victim hood mentality.Well Kashmiris are eastern Iranian culturally and have been opressed by Hindu and Sikh rulers from India, killing them in the hundreds of thousands in famines. I doubt they wouldve wanted to join India, especially the regions Pakistan has freed which are basically central Asian(GB) and north Punjabi(AJK).
We simply didnt want to live with hindus, nor did we trust them
This should have been respected!!!!!!
Simply accepting that we didnt like you and didnt want to live side by side with you meant that the sub continent could have healed after a decade or two and moved on
its disputed because be dont do a fuckabout it.wow what an idiot. Kashmir is disputed territory.
As I said read, and learn a bit before proving yourself being a blithering idiot on a public forum.This Indian clown thinks he can retain Kashmir against the will of Kashmiris, not even in your wildest dreams is it possible. Entire India will burn in a nuclear fireball before it can even start to happen.
India is a democracy only on paper. BJB JUNOONIS know nothing about democracy.
ha ha if this is true then why run away from UN ?