This Hindutva vadi forces in India have emerged as a power centre only in last decade or so. They were always on the fringes but never in power.
We don't ascribe to your views. According to us, and our Quaid, Indian National Congress was as much "Hindutvadi" as was Mahasabha or RSS, with no difference in fundamental ideology of installing a "Hindu Raj" on Subcontinent, with Muslims relegated to discriminatory second-class citizenship. The difference was only of shade and methods, with so called secularism, merely a garb and sham. RSS is just a crude version of Congress. That was the reason, that Muslims, by and large, never give a damn to Congress, nor trusted it ever, right from its inception by British overlords. Better read pre-Independence political history of Subcontinent. For us, Gandhi, Nehru, Patel and Savarkar are same.
"Dunya main balaayain dau he tau haen, ik Savarkar, ik Gandhi hae
Ik jhoot ka chalta jhakarh hae, ik makar ki uthti aandhi hae"
(Maulana Zafar Ali Khan)
Pakistan has been attacking India regularly since independence and failing. Hence blaming Hindutva vadi forces and justifying Pakistan’s hawkish stance against India right since 1947 is incorrect.
India initiated the intense conflict with Pakistan, by attacking and occupying the Muslim-majority state of Kashmir, thus instituting an attack on the foundational basis of Pakistan. All the later conflicts are consequence of that. "Failing" or whatever, forget that we are going to bow down to this Hindutvadi scum, named India.
The current Indian government has decided to pay back with a similar hawkish attitude and people are not liking it.
I told you, for us no difference between Nehru and Modi. Both are Hindutvadi rascals, albeit of somewhat different shades.