Pakistan has ICBM Technology Defence Production Minister

[gslv mk3]

Ineffective.

Pakistani missiles can/will easily break india's "shield"...

The distance is very less between two nations. Can't work.

they're going to allocate two missiles per phase ( there are 2 phases ) per your missile,guess what the hit probability is gonna be.

 

[Ahsan Butt]

Let's see a SLV first at least.

Exactly

 

[black-hawk_101]

Any Image of Taimoor.

 

[FuturePAF]

google image for "zhuhai 2014 Feitian";
that system would make a great SLV is pakistan could buy it (doubt its for "sale"; but who knows with tech transfers)

this system is also known as the FT-1

 

[CiciHoriOzK]

they're going to allocate two missiles per phase ( there are 2 phases ) per your missile,guess what the hit probability is gonna be.

how can they engage without endangering own people?

 

[FuturePAF]

india will probably take the chance, but try to plan where boosters will fall like how israel plans out where boosters from their ABM missiles are planned, or how the iron dome booster and actually the debris from the impact fall

it all depends on how much the air defense force care about the details of public safety, risk to a few lives or making sure the incoming missile is knocked down

 

[CiciHoriOzK]

i guess there is no true way to prevent collateral damage.

 

[gslv mk3]

how can they engage without endangering own people?

I didn't get you.

 

[AUz]

they're going to allocate two missiles per phase ( there are 2 phases ) per your missile,guess what the hit probability is gonna be.

Don't live in fantasies.

Pakistani missiles are unstoppable for india.

and will remain unstoppable for india in future.

When indian ABM comes online, we'll have our own solutions deployed (for example: MIRVed payloads)...

You can have three missiles per phase (which is itself a joke..but whateves..)..you still won't be able to stop MIRV warheads. (Unless offcourse your tech reaches the stage where the latest-most tech of the United States would be in 2020 or so...)

 

[gslv mk3]

When indian ABM comes online, we'll have our own solutions deployed (for example: MIRVed payloads)...

You don't have MIRVs now.We will take it into account after you have successfully tested and deployed it.Meanwhile Indian ABM system is already tested and being deployed

Don't live in fantasies.

Pakistani missiles are unstoppable for india.

and will remain unstoppable for india in future.

Non sense.

(which is itself a joke..but whateves.

Shows your ignorance in these matters.

 

[The SC]

Adjusting RCS of "attack" UAVs in a first wave to something bigger, let's say the F-16s or JF-17s and BM warheads will light up the Indian ABM system, then the real attack or 2nd wave will destroy the radars with anti-radiation missiles, the third wave will be the BMs... for instance!

 

[Viper0011.]

I still think that Mi-28NE talk is just 'talk'.

The MI deal can turn into a reality pretty darn quickly as the Russians need the money and they'd love to give out a few existing MI's on a short notice. But the Chinese are against it. They are pushing PA to acquire their platform, which is why the immediate transfer of Z's for a test drive and to complement PA right away. This way, overtime, the MI's will become a dream as the PA will train its people on the Z series and then they'll give more with TOT and a much reduced price tag. I think this is a great option for PA as they can locally assemble / build these and save $$$$

 

[gslv mk3]

Adjusting RCS of "attack" UAVs in a first wave to something bigger, let's say the F-16s or JF-17s and BM warheads will light up the Indian ABM system, then the real attack or 2nd wave will destroy the radars with anti-radiation missiles, the third wave will be the BMs... for instance!

Non sense.Swordfish radars can identify a BM from its trajectory.I hope your F 16 or JF 17 wont take a sub-orbital trajectory
Which anti-radiation missile has range to hit radar installations at say Delhi or Bangalore ?

 

[The SC]

Non sense.Swordfish radars can identify a bm .
Which anti-radiation missile has range to hit radar installations at say Delhi or Bangalore ?

The answer as you know is in the distance and how to cover it in steps, first wave, second wave and third wave and maybe more waves!, ARMs are Commonly carried by specialist aircraft.
Also:
Several surface-to-surface missiles, like the P-700 Granit, P-500 Bazalt, MM40 Exocet, B611MR, and OTO Melara Teseo include a home-on-jam capability wherein the receiver component of their active radar seeker is used to home in on enemy radar, ECM or communications. This makes these missiles significantly harder to defeat with ECM and distraction countermeasures, and makes the use of semi-active missiles against them dangerous.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-radiation_missile
Anti-radiation missile - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Current State of India’s BMD

Still, India’s ballistic missile program is far from problem-free. Confusion and doubts surround India’s much trumpeted success in missile interception. Though one can observe DRDO’s declarations of deployment of a BMD in Delhi and Mumbai since 2008, no considerable progress on the front has been made. This should warrant particular concern in light of the scientific community’s tendency to exaggerate its technical accomplishments. There is also some confusion over the accuracy of these interceptions. DRDO claims a 90 percent accuracy level. Civilian analysts, on the other hand, greet this claim with a heavy dose of skepticism; after all, even the most technologically advanced countries have an interception accuracy of 70 percent.

Also, some critics have questioned the DRDO’s claim that the system is ready to be deployed. As skeptics point out, the system has only been tested in controlled environments. Moreover, the intercepted missiles targeted in these exercises are slow moving Prithvi-class missiles. They also argue that when analyzed against missiles that travel at far greater speeds based on solid fuel booster mechanisms, DRDO’s claims of an effective BMD system seem exaggerated. In other words, DRDO’s capabilities are far from proven when pitted against Chinese ICBMs, such as the DF-41.

India’s Missile Defense: Is the Game Worth the Candle? | The Diplomat | Page 2

 

[gslv mk3]

The answer as you know is in the distance and how to cover it in steps, first wave, second wave and third wave and maybe more waves!, ARMs are Commonly carried by specialist aircraft.

And how do you expect the specialist aircraft to reach within missile launching range of target (200 kms) without ever getting detected/intercepted?

Several surface-to-surface missiles, like the P-700 Granit, P-500 Bazalt, MM40 Exocet, B611MR, and OTO Melara Teseo.

And Pakistan has none of these.

Still, India’s ballistic missile program is far from problem-free. Confusion and doubts surround India’s much trumpeted success in missile interception. Though one can observe DRDO’s declarations of deployment of a BMD in Delhi and Mumbai since 2008, no considerable progress on the front has been made. This should warrant particular concern in light of the scientific community’s tendency to exaggerate its technical accomplishments. There is also some confusion over the accuracy of these interceptions. DRDO claims a 90 percent accuracy level. Civilian analysts, on the other hand, greet this claim with a heavy dose of skepticism; after all, even the most technologically advanced countries have an interception accuracy of 70 percent.

Also, some critics have questioned the DRDO’s claim that the system is ready to be deployed. As skeptics point out, the system has only been tested in controlled environments. Moreover, the intercepted missiles targeted in these exercises are slow moving Prithvi-class missiles. They also argue that when analyzed against missiles that travel at far greater speeds based on solid fuel booster mechanisms, DRDO’s claims of an effective BMD system seem exaggerated. In other words, DRDO’s capabilities are far from proven when pitted against Chinese ICBMs, such as the DF-41.

@2013 article,written before launch of pdv.deployment has already started.