Pakistan has developed smartest nuclear tactical devices

[K-Xeroid]

PAKISTAN MADE WORLD SMALLEST ATOMIC BOMB

Pervez musharraf told american officials what we have made, Diplomatic source

Islamabad (ansar abbasi)In pakistani nuclear program a big step forward have been taken and world's smallest tactical atomic weapon have been made. According to foreign ambassador Ex dictator pervez musharraf thought its good to tell american officials in a conference that what pakistan has and how pakistani atomic scientists have made the defence of the country secured. Diplomatic source said that new delhi knows what pakistan have made and they know that this thing have no examples. Indians got this information from americans and source said that musharraf willingly gave this information to americans so that they will not try any misadventure like iraq or afghanistan with pakistan. Pakistan didn't signed NPT nor CTBT but they have singularly decided that they will use their nuclear program as deterrence against any country's aggression. After the propaganda of all type against pakistani nuclear program by western capitals especially washington Pakistan have also developed a reliable and foolproof command and control system for its atomic program. american officials admitted the structure and security system of pakistani nuclear weapons. A think tank in washington said that pakistan have increased its plutonium producing capability. Website also said that in 2009 the number of atomic bombs in pakisran was round about 200 but they also agreed on a point that it is difficult for the experts also to estimate the actuall amount. Because pakistan's nuclear program is in strict security. Pakistan's nuclear program was started in the reign of zulfiqar ali bhutto and its experoment was done in the reign of nawaz sharif on 28 may 1998.

Its not a time to leak such information... Hidden capabilities can cause much confusion for enemies,

 

[JonAsad]

What the heck does that mean? A stealth bomb?

It's the DELIVERY systems that need to have stealth and not the bomb itself!

in case you haven't noticed a bomb is always a stealth bomb till it explodes-

 

[Birruna]

 

[Mav3rick]

Means Cia is Preparing For another false flag attack to blame it on PAKISTAN.If we Ever had things like that one why would we make it public.
JonAsad is 100% Right..

How about a worldwide campaign on CIA where we tell the world that CIA would soon plant another false flag operation with a small tactical nuke or a dirty bomb in some US city to justify a war on Pakistan. And then if that ever happens, we can simply say "We told you so...."!

 

[Mav3rick]

how small is this 'small nuke'??

Some of the smallest nukes are called the suitcase nuke and it looks like this :

More on suitcase nuke

Small enough to fit in a 12.7mm bullet.

 

[kill_me]

this is another drama from US.....
a small nuclear attack by so called Islamist in NATO countries will lead them here.
I think its a trap they will use in future to bring Pakistan under pressure.

......... you got an interesting theory there .... but lets wait and see, if someone interviews him, what mr. mushraf has to say about this? if he denies telling americans any such thing then you may be right

 

[regular]

US is no mood to get bogged down in another land war of a country of 180 million people. So relax.

The only attack that will occur on Pakistan will be launched by terrorists from FATA.

I guess U underestimating the powerz of US....they can literally send the whole country to the stone age without any problems cuz they almost ready for it....They just looking for a reason to enter.They didn't just come to Afghanistan for nothing , We are their the only target.....

 

[jamshaid56us]

if america attacks Pakistan, it will result massive destruction, no dought american have power to attack but remember most of their military depot are in our missile ranges, we can easily destroy their aircraft carriers, dont worry about american anti missile system because if the missed only one missile of ours it will be a death certificate for them, and if china intentially or unintentially enters the war, it will triger the 3rd world war, because america will ask help from indians and if they just jumped down into the war it will be the start of world war three........... definately Europeans and othe american allies are not ready for that because if they cant handle just afghanistan how can the face the whole world

 

[I M Sikander]

This report would have found its place in a dust bin, if it had undergone editorial review by any defence analyst before publication. This report didn't worth to be published.

(This report was filed by Ansar Abbasi in Jang and Daily News. Ansar Abbasi is a senior journalist, but it was one of his worst written reports i have ever seen, no source, no details.)

---------- Post added at 02:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:17 AM ----------

......... you got an interesting theory there .... but lets wait and see, if someone interviews him, what mr. mushraf has to say about this? if he denies telling americans any such thing then you may be right

This whole report is a piece of crap. and such things happens when political journalist (Ansar Abbasi) files report on defence issue without having the basic understanding.

 

[I M Sikander]

How about a worldwide campaign on CIA where we tell the world that CIA would soon plant another false flag operation with a small tactical nuke or a dirty bomb in some US city to justify a war on Pakistan. And then if that ever happens, we can simply say "We told you so...."!

The stronger don't need excuses to justify their actions. If Americans are up to some thing, they won't fabricate such stories, they would prefer to implement their plans, like Abbotabad operation and mehmand strikes.

 

[I M Sikander]

if america attacks Pakistan, it will result massive destruction, no dought american have power to attack but remember most of their military depot are in our missile ranges, we can easily destroy their aircraft carriers, dont worry about american anti missile system because if the missed only one missile of ours it will be a death certificate for them,

Vow a great film story dude. (infact a comdey movie).

and if china intentially or unintentially enters the war,

Y would Chinese poke their nose. would you explain please.

it will triger the 3rd world war, because america will ask help from indians and if they just jumped down into the war it will be the start of world war three........... definately

You know man, you have excellent film writing skills. Please do make a sequel of this above mentioned comedy movie.

Europeans and othe american allies are not ready for that because if they cant handle just afghanistan how can the face the whole world

I am not worried how would Europe and US will handle Pakistan" However I am much more concerned about How we will handle NATO. US and INDIA in 3rd world war..

 

[Chogy]

Small nukes are horribly inefficient, and also more destabilizing than strategic weapons.

About the smallest that can be made is about 155mm in diameter, but the yield is just pathetic and is a really poor choice for actual tactical use.

The USA and Russia both have been getting away from tactical weapons, because there is an implication that they would be used in a normal battlefield scenario. By definition, tactical assets are assigned to Army groups, to smaller subsets of a national command authority, and while you can have safeguards in place that they are not used without permission, the likelihood does go up.

 

[LEGENDARY WARRIOR]

welcome to PAKISTAN chotooo....

 

[bubble123]

Small nukes are horribly inefficient, and also more destabilizing than strategic weapons.

About the smallest that can be made is about 155mm in diameter, but the yield is just pathetic and is a really poor choice for actual tactical use.

The USA and Russia both have been getting away from tactical weapons, because there is an implication that they would be used in a normal battlefield scenario. By definition, tactical assets are assigned to Army groups, to smaller subsets of a national command authority, and while you can have safeguards in place that they are not used without permission, the likelihood does go up.

Would u shed more light on the line in bold cause its a surprise to me. I was under the impression that tactical nukes are the ultimate form of nukes.

Anyways as u guyz know that we don't have conventional superiority as US,Russia or even Chinese have. and we have started to lag in the arms race against india and god forbid what would happen if tomorrow ur country decides to have an adventure.

So i think that tactical nukes are the need of the hour(at least for Pakistan if not others).

 

[Chogy]

Would u shed more light on the line in bold cause its a surprise to me. I was under the impression that tactical nukes are the ultimate form of nukes.

Ultimate in what sense? The really small nukes like the Davy Crockett recoilless nuclear rifle had a yield of a kiloton or less. The smallest nukes ever made had yields measured in the tens of tons, barely more than conventional munitions when you consider blast is a cubed (to the third power) effect - meaning a 10 kt nuke is not twice as destructive as a 5 kt nuke, it is a few % more only.

The small nukes fission only a tiny, tiny fraction of their core, and spew huge amounts of really harsh radioactivity.

I think they are more destabilizing because they are more likely to be used. A commander about to be overrun will be sorely tempted to fire that 1 kt tactical nuke, where he'd never consider using a 100 kt strategic weapon. And once you nuke an enemy, regardless of size, you've crossed the line, and a nuclear exchange will probably follow.