Pakistan has bought these Beasts from Serbia

[Zarvan]

Alas C Anti Tank Missile system

@Path-Finder

 

[fitpOsitive]

https://twitter.com/x/status/924235628954386434

Google say: Developed by Serbia, the 50km-range TV / DataLink guided land-to-land Kosava-1 faction has been sold to Pakistan.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Rocket assisted aerial bombs (FABS)converted into this, main use against army troops, artillery etc.

Now we will saw some serious action at LOC a single missile (T.V guided) can take out full bunker in one strike with range of 50KMS mean stay out of Indian range and hit them hard on rear end.

1. That's just about the range of a current generation 155 mm howitzer. So don't be too sure you have sufficient cover.
2. Look up the Pinaka system.

It won't be one-way traffic.

 

[Maarkhoor]

1. That's just about the range of a current generation 155 mm howitzer. So don't be too sure you have sufficient cover.
2. Look up the Pinaka system.

It won't be one-way traffic.

Sir,
Pinaka is unguided MRLS system with many flaws not widely inducted as per my info and Howitzers are consider heavy artillery and I suspect at LOC India would go for that since we match the numbers.

For LOC bunker busting we are using anti tank missile (wire guided) baktar shikan and I believe the above monster will give us further advantage.

 

[Rank]

 

[Joe Shearer]

Sir,
Pinaka is unguided MRLS system with many flaws not widely inducted as per my info and Howitzers are consider heavy artillery and I suspect at LOC India would go for that since we match the numbers.

For LOC bunker busting we are using anti tank missile (wire guided) baktar shikan and I believe the above monster will give us further advantage.

You are right on both counts. However, the Pinaka system has been looked at lazily with less than serious intent because of the ready availability of a sufficient number of Russian MBRLs. It does not take serious effort to improve and sharpen the performance of these, and the effort is justified by the hugely lower cost of production and deployment.

Again, the numbers of heavy artillery units match at present, and this is on the edge of the very large induction planned. With that induction, every year, the disparity will increase. At least three systems are available for induction, a very good development by a private sector manufacturer, a re-build from the drawings of the Bofors guns, obtained at the time of procurement but forgotten ever since until a couple of years ago (this should be handed over to another, not the same, private sector manufacturer), and imports of the ultra-light weight portable howitzers. Look for a massive build-up covering the neglect of decades.

You are still right in assuming that the Baktar Shikan and this present mobile unit will give the PA an advantage in bunker-busting, but have you thought of the consequences, in cost-benefit terms, of India building a very large number of bunkers, of which 90% may be remote manned? The technology has been tested in laboratories and in a very few field trials, again by private manufacturers, and can be mass-produced at short notice in very large volumes. How many will the PA blow up, and at what cost?

 

[Imran Khan]

what the hack is thing ?

 

[Zarvan]

View attachment 433775

Finally you are back man you are needed no one makes these better than you

 

[oOo]

what the hack is thing ?

Patakhe hain.

 

[Zarvan]

what the hack is thing ?

I am still trying to figure it out

 

[Maarkhoor]

How many will the PA blow up, and at what cost?

Your reply reminds me this dialogue "Sawal yeh nahien hai k bar mien kitni daru hai, sawal yeh hai k tum kinti pee saktey ho".
We are locally producing Baktar-Shikan very effective mobile and cheap, no comments further....
Sir, with every Bunkar-Busting you may loose men inside too, too many bankers too many soldiers.

 

[fitpOsitive]

Sir, with every Bunkar-Busting you may loose men inside too, too many bankers too many soldiers.

Which they don't care about.

 

[Maarkhoor]

I am still trying to figure it out

Bro you know FAB (bombs) air to ground? they converted them land to land missile by adding rocket means air drop FAB bomb turned into a missile a guided one.

 

[Joe Shearer]

what the hack is thing ?

In simple terms, a rocket launcher. It doesn't have its own warheads; it is designed to carry adapted aerial bombs. Instead of launching the bombs from planes, you fit them onto the nose of a Kosava rocket and launch the rocket. The rocket travels ballistic for one phase, then disengages, and the bomb-carrying nose can be guided to its precise target by laser illumination; for instance, by a rifleman lying concealed with a laser pointing device pointing at the target. So the nose cone is guided home by the laser beam.

The normal bomb-type is a fuel air device; you can use other types as well. If you lighten the payload, it travels more than 20 kms, maximum of 50 kms. You can sit in Lahore and bust up Amritsar. The PA says it's going to use these for bunker-busting: too expensive for that. Not sure what exactly they are planning.

Your reply reminds me this dialogue "Sawal yeh nahien hai k bar mien kitni daru hai, sawal yeh hai k tum kinti pee saktey ho".
We are locally producing Baktar-Shikan very effective mobile and cheap, no comments further....
Sir, with every Bunkar-Busting you may loose men inside too, too many bankers too many soldiers.

True enough. I hope you realise that people are actively working on remote-manned bunkers. How many will you bust? At those cost differentials?

 

[Zarvan]

Bro you know FAB (bombs) air to ground? they converted them land to land missile by adding rocket means air drop FAB bomb turned into a missile a guided one.

Okay Okay now I understand good thing to get also we should consider this from Serbia