What's new

Pakistan F-16 Discussions 2

Yeah but the whole story of the americans installing those chips on the exact same photocopier on which those plans were photocopied is a bit ludicrous. Or had they installed those chips on every single photocopier shipped to Iraq? Or maybe more believable somehow planted those chips when the photocopiers were shipped to the known customer, in this case the higher Iraqi military offices. But still it sounds a bit not too plausible.


They can know which product was shipped to which country. So they might have just done on all of them. Like i said, installing an electronic device like that in a big machine like a photocopiear isn't a big of a task.

Remember that CIA and NSA's intelligence budget is more than the entire defense/intelligence budgets of Pakistan and India combined.

They have money to throw.
 
.
1101223643-1.gif
 
.
It's an open secret that an American drone was actually shot down by the Pakistan Forces, the current information minister even disclosed it in a slip up,
However the whole matter was later buried in the technical fault Manuel.
 
.
No need to seriously seriously doubt anything....

As an electronics engineer i can assure you that it is very easy to design entire systems on a single chip.

Infact, Photocopiers have capability to make copies secretly.......it came as part of deal so copyright could be respected......so administrators can later retrieve them if needed.

US could have easily designed such a system. They will never give a clean product to a country they see as their future combat enemy.

I don't know about transmitters in photocopiers, but every photocopier has a hard drive where an image of every copy ever made is stored.

There was a recent documentary where a tv channel crew bought a lot of used/old photocopiers, took their hard drives out and retrieved the photocopied document image from each...some had highly sensitive/confidential info (think govt/military stuff).
 
. . . .

Notice the extra protrusion between the vertical stabilizer and the engine on the F-16A MLU than the F-16C in the sketch. Now one can see this particular F-16C tail design on the block 30/32, 40/42 and I think block 50 F-16Cs as well. But the block 52 and 52+ F-16C's tail design resembles more to the F-16A MLU as shown in the sketch.

USAF block 40 and 42 F-16Cs:
dsc6826f16cblock40c8804.jpg

bl20271f16cblock42g8921.jpg


A Polish F-16C 52:
800pxkrzesiny11rb.jpg


A Hellenic F-16C 52+:
f16bl52.jpg


And the new Pakistani F-16C 52+:
22191822088380459273913.jpg
 
. .
Can anyone one tell me the total number of F 16s PAF has?(block 52+ and block 15 MLU)and r there any plans to get more as FC 20 MIGHT get delayed?
 
.
Can anyone one tell me the total number of F 16s PAF has?(block 52+ and block 15 MLU)and r there any plans to get more as FC 20 MIGHT get delayed?

pls search the threads - this has been dealth with a 1,000 times
 
.
What is Dr. Samar Mubarakmand doing talking about F-16's and its capabilities? I do hope that we do not have another AQK in the making. This type of jingoism is one of the reasons for our going down the drain.

Some things are better left un-said
 
.
What is Dr. Samar Mubarakmand doing talking about F-16's and its capabilities? I do hope that we do not have another AQK in the making. This type of jingoism is one of the reasons for our going down the drain.

Some things are better left un-said

AQK's consistent rivalry with Dr Samar seems to be wearing off on him ;)
 
. .
Yeah but the whole story of the americans installing those chips on the exact same photocopier on which those plans were photocopied is a bit ludicrous. Or had they installed those chips on every single photocopier shipped to Iraq? Or maybe more believable somehow planted those chips when the photocopiers were shipped to the known customer, in this case the higher Iraqi military offices. But still it sounds a bit not too plausible.

He is right, be weary of American copiers.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom