volcano
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2014
- Messages
- 276
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
I responded to this point in post #15:
If the Taliban don't elect a new leader, who is Afghanistan going to negotiate with?
Keep in mind that the currently elected leader, Mullah Mansoor, who is being challenged by hardline Taliban factions, is the one who was strongly in favor of peace talks. Afghanistan and Pakistan both need his leadership to be recognized by the majority of the Taliban, because the alternatives are those in favor of endless conflict.
This is why these Taliban leadership meetings have been facilitated, and Ghani has been at the fore-front of pushing Pakistan to bring the Taliban to the negotiating table. Without a new Taliban leadership amnabke to dualog, there is no one to bring to the table, and if Ghani thought the war could be won militarily in a reasonable time frame by the ANA, with its existing resources , he, the US and China would never have pushed for peace talks to begin with.
Just some bullshit excuse. If terrorist organisation didn't have a unifying leader, then its bad for the country fighting againist it!!! wow.. It amuse me to see the way pakistanese are trying to justify their action. If talibitchs doesn't have a unifying leader, only logical conclusion is leadership crisis infighting and talibitches loosing their momentum againist afgan army.
But what pakistan doing is alowing them to regroup, unify and make them powerful again. Thats exactly what pakistan done when the sensored mulla omars death. Pakistan knew taliban will loose momentum and group will get scattered due to leadership crisis if mulla omers death become public.