What's new

Pakistan Defence Exports $300Million!

Pakistan needs to do more, it should be just begining. I think we should capture the international market by producing more quality weapons and our local weapons industary should be self relient, we should be depend on any aid or burdon on our economy, like the developed courntries are proceeding. One thing we must keep in mind that our weapons shouldn't go into wrong hands but should be sold to the recognized governments. Why don't we attract the middle eastern countries who are giving the business to European and American companies? :pakistan:
 
.
Why anybody has'nt pointed out the deal of exporting 22 Al-Khalid tanks to Sri lankan Army. Gen Frank Formosa (Srilankan Army COAS) met his Pakistani counterpart and finalised the deal.
Bengladesh signed a deal with Pakistan's HIT for upgradation of it's Type 69 Tanks to Al-Zarar class. HIT will upgrade them in Bengladeshi factory.
Saudi Army is taking trials of Al-Khalid in Desert warfare use (as per their requirement) and if they will consider it useful for desert terrain, an order is likely to be placed for Al-Khalid delivery to Royal Saudi Army and possibly their National Guard.:pakistan:
 
.
Why anybody has'nt pointed out the deal of exporting 22 Al-Khalid tanks to Sri lankan Army. Gen Frank Formosa (Srilankan Army COAS) met his Pakistani counterpart and finalised the deal.
Bengladesh signed a deal with Pakistan's HIT for upgradation of it's Type 69 Tanks to Al-Zarar class. HIT will upgrade them in Bengladeshi factory.
Saudi Army is taking trials of Al-Khalid in Desert warfare use (as per their requirement) and if they will consider it useful for desert terrain, an order is likely to be placed for Al-Khalid delivery to Royal Saudi Army and possibly their National Guard.:pakistan:

1. on your 1st point - pls provide link to verify as there is no news.
2. on your 2nd point - BD did not take up offer to upgrade their T-69s (ref: pls check sticky on BD Army)
3. on your 3rd point - trials of Al-Khalid were held in SA in 2006, and since then no further movement on this issue - so after 3 years dont expect anything!
 
.
It,s good news that pakistan made all that money, but what we need is to pump all that money back into these arms companies for the purchase of improved manufacturing machinery and in research&development. The more money that goes back into the cycle of things the better products and more sales we will see. The off shoot of this would be better self sufficiency, more jobs for pakistanis in high end technology industries and better relations with other countries (customers).
 
.
Pakistan Defence and Security Report Q1 2009

Pakistan Defence and Security Report Q1 2009 - Companies and Markets New Analysis

© companiesandmarkets.com

20.07.2009

Pakistan Defence and Security Report Q1 2009 - a new market research report on companiesandmarkets.com

The Mumbai terrorist attacks of November 2008 rocked South Asia and have sparked fears of regional instability and a flare up of tensions between India and Pakistan. The only terrorist captured alive, Mohammad Ajmal Amir, disclosed that the group of attackers belonged to Lashkar-e-Toiba, a Pakistani militant organisation. Pakistan has responded to a number of India’s requests in the aftermath of the attacks, and has arrested some twenty members of the terrorist group residing within the country.

Islamabad faces a myriad of challenges as we enter 2009 but two stand out as particularly acute: bringing the presently dysfunctional economy back on an even keel; and quelling the militancy emanating from the country’s restive north-western border region. President Asif Ali Zardari, under formidable external pressure to deal with the latter, will have to work hard to convince Pakistanis that he is his own man, and not at the beck and call of Washington, while also making sure that desperately needed financial assistance materialises.

On the international front, Pakistan and China have held high level talks involving President Zardari and his Chinese counterpart Hu Jintao, as well as other dignitaries. The meetings, held in China in October 2008, were characterised by warmth, friendship and a feeling of mutual understanding, and fashioned a broad agreement on strengthening Pakistan-China strategic relations, first established some 57 years ago.

The meeting reiterated the importance of the 2005 Treaty of Friendship, Co-operation and Goodneighbourly Relations between the two countries and stressed the importance of intensifying co-operation with respect to areas of the economy, defence, science and technology.

Pakistan’s defence industry contains over 20 major public sector units (PSUs) and over 100 private-sector firms. The majority of major weapons systems production and assembly is undertaken by the state-owned PSUs, while the private-sector supplies parts, components, bladed weapons and field equipment. Major PSUs include the Pakistan Ordnance Factory (POF), Heavy Industries Taxila (HIT), Karachi Shipyard and Engineering Works (KSEW) and the Pakistan Machine Tool Factory. Multinational presence in Pakistan is limited, although joint production or engineering support in the development of certain armaments has recently occurred with companies such as DCN International and the Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group.

In November 2008, Ministry of Defence Production Secretary Shahid Siddiq Tirmizi announced that as many as eight countries have expressed interest in acquiring the newly launched JF-17 Thunder fighter, a China-Pakistan joint venture. Tirmizi expects that 800 or more could be produced once sale agreements have been reached. The Pakistan Air Force has been putting the new jet through its paces with a series of trials and technical evaluations. Other defence products of Pakistani extraction garnering interest in international circles include unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), air defence systems, tank simulators, and anti-tank guided missiles. Tirmizi noted that between 2006 and 2008, Pakistan had exported US$400mn worth of defence products.

Meanwhile, the Pakistani economy is likely to experience continued turbulence over the remainder of FY09, in view of lingering inflationary pressures, serious security woes and unfavourable external dynamics, and this will in all likelihood manifest itself in slower growth. However, beyond the short-tomedium term, we expect to see a gradual stabilisation of the economy and remain reasonably sanguine about Pakistan’s longer-term growth prospects.

Author:
Mike King
e-mail
 
. .
there were some news in the press that our some of our ordinance low quaility and did not function.
 
.
Tirmizi noted that between 2006 and 2008, Pakistan had exported US$400mn worth of defence products.

The first report of $300 million published July 2008 and current report is of 2006 to 2008 time frame. Which one is correct?
 
.
The first report of $300 million published July 2008 and current report is of 2006 to 2008 time frame. Which one is correct?

From the first article:

"Pakistan’s defence exports have tripled to around $300 million"

That probably refers to 2008 alone, whereas the 400 million figure refers to two years worth of exports.
 
.
From the first article:

"Pakistan’s defence exports have tripled to around $300 million"

That probably refers to 2008 alone, whereas the 400 million figure refers to two years worth of exports.

i'd go for the second, not because i posted it! we dont export many high ticket value items!
 
.
Last i heard Pakistan wasn't much interested in the HQ-9 and FT-2000 never made it to the production line.

there are number of report on this forum and others that clearly says that Pakistan is interested in HQ-9 and forceindia even claims that order for 9 to 10 batteries is already placed (But its Indian source and is not all that reliable)

He said Pakistan had built Agosta submarines and Puma and Ecureil helicopters with the help of France “with transfer of technology”.

I can imagine that we might have done some upgradation & rebuild on our puma helicopters but what about the statement that we had build Ecureil helicopter with TOT?
 
Last edited:
.
The first report of $300 million published July 2008 and current report is of 2006 to 2008 time frame. Which one is correct?

i'd go for the second, not because i posted it! we dont export many high ticket value items!


Both reports are correct

As first report says that Pakistan’s defence exports have tripled to around $300 million during the year 2007-08 and second report says that Pakistan had exported US$400mn worth of defence products between 2006 and 2008.

This basically means that export during the 2006-07 were US $ 100 mn and tripled to US $ 300 mn (ie US $100mn x 3 = US $300) during the 2007-08, therefore total exports were US $ 400 mn for 2006-08
 
Last edited:
.
Both reports are correct

As first report says that Pakistan’s defence exports have tripled to around $300 million during the year 2007-08 and second report says that Pakistan had exported US$400mn worth of defence products between 2006 and 2008.

This basically means that export during the 2006-07 were US $ 100 mn and tripled to US $ 300 mn (ie US $100mn x 3 = US $300) during the 2007-08, therefore total exports were US $ 400 mn for 2006-08

send this guy to MIT !:cheers:
 
.
there are number of report on this forum and others that clearly says that Pakistan is interested in HQ-9 and forceindia even claims that order for 9 to 10 batteries is already placed (But its Indian source and is not all that reliable)



I can imagine that we might have done some upgradation & rebuild on our puma helicopters but what about the statement that we had build Ecureil helicopter with TOT?

they were CKD kits, assembled in Pakistan !
 
.
there were some news in the press that our some of our ordinance low quaility and did not function.

indian propoganda esp on deliveries made to Sri Lanka - POF is a ISO certified organisation!
 
.
Back
Top Bottom