Pakistan could unleash ‘Ghazwa-e-Hind’ against India,If US troops exit Kabul: Ex- RAW Chief

[maximuswarrior]

India is the sperm and as well as the egg when it comes to terrorism. no toilets but masters of spreading terrorism.


just ask any of indias neighbours what they think of this hindu terrorist country.


nothing new for indians. they shit themselves litreally everyday

Rapist scum is what these Indians are.

 

[django]

@Tps43 @django

I see what you did their hahahahahaa.Kudos Mentee bhai

 

[PakSword]

What ???? Is it really written by an ex-raw guy?

Lollll.

Now bhartis are trying to persuade US by this??? Come on .. You guys could tell something else... These kind of reports make your population restless and they all run towards rail tracks

 

[Awan68]

One thing this lunatic article tells u though, all the hot air and the bravado India faked rhese past 10 yrs was all due to the presence of thier daddies the yankees in the region. They can see now that with daddy leaving the big bad wolf Pakistan will rape the little red hood India.

 

[PakSarzameen5823]

Insha'Allah

 

[El Sidd]

The American mujahideens will also take part in the ghazwa.

Goodluck !!

 

[PakSword]

The American mujahideens will also take part in the ghazwa.

Goodluck !!

Arey sir aap ka favorite topic chher diya raw ki ex ne

 

[newb3e]

Dhotis are getting wet

mootis are shrinking!

 

[Pakhtoon yum]

If US troops exit Kabul, and the Taliban holds sway, Pakistan could unleash ‘Ghazwa-e-Hind’ against India

• VIKRAM SOOD

We could soon see America leave Afghanistan's brutal war half-finished. The implications of this will be dreadful for ordinary Afghans. This is no good news for India either.

A soldier with the Afghan National Army standing in a truck at an outpost

Source: Andrew Renneisen / Getty Images

• AMERICA FIRST
• HAQQANI NETWORK
• NATO
• PAKISTANI DEEP STATE

Nearly forty years ago, on Christmas Day in 1979, Soviet tanks and troops were airlifted into Kabul — in what became a bloody battle between ‘godless’ Communists on one side, and Islamic mujahedeen backed by the West, Pakistan, the Emirates and Saudi Arabia on the other.

If the 1980s were the years of what ultimately came to be known as the Afghan jihad, the 1990s were the years of civil war, with the Taliban triumphant in Kabul.

The 21st century has seen the results of an unending US-led ‘Global War on Terror’, located in Afghanistan, among other Muslim countries. The Afghans were punished for their location — while Pakistan rewarded for its. This also makes it the longest war that any country has faced in modern times.

Today, most people, when they talk about the situation in Afghanistan, also refer to it as ‘America's longest war’. No one really considers that the helpless Afghan population has been subjected to an endless war, which has inflicted unimaginable deprivation and depredation for nearly 40 years.

Afghans have been punished for being on the crossroads of superpower rivalry, and for no fault of theirs, while the narrative has been that these wars were for their ‘liberation’ from the Communists in the 1980s, and ‘emancipation’ during the dark days of the Taliban and Al Qaeda in the 21st century.

The WTC attack in New York was by Saudis mostly. The Taliban were sheltering Al Qaeda — and the Pakistan Deep State was sheltering and assisting the Taliban.

Afghanistan was the only place where an angered America could afford to exhibit its wrath.

Americans fought in the wrong place, Afghanistan, with wrong and inadequate means. They were helped by a ‘major non-NATO ally’ — as President Bush referred to Pakistan, which was double-crossing them even as the Americans paid handsomely in billions of dollars for this duplicity.

There were never enough troops on the ground to defeat and hold territory gained.

Wars were fought from the comfort of air-conditioned consoles thousands of miles away — where soundless blips on LED screens show collateral damage, but do not record the pain, nor ensure victory.

Excessive reliance on aerial power means that the situation on the ground is adverse and the military situation is in a stalemate. A superpower cannot afford to be in a stalemate, for this actually means defeat.

No wonder today, the Americans are negotiating with the Taliban — whom they had sworn to eliminate — for a safe and honourable exit for US forces from Afghanistan.

The effect of this decision on other regional players is assumed to be of little consequence.

This is a clear exhibition of the ‘America First’ policy of President Donald Trump. Meanwhile, Trump, possibly pursuing a declared (April 20, 2019) date for a negotiated settlement, suddenly announced partial troop reduction even as his representative was speaking to the Taliban and the violence continued unabated. A suicide attack — this year’s 22nd attack in Kabul — accompanied by an attack via unknown terrorists killed 40 persons in Kabul on December 25.

The Taliban denied any responsibility for this attack, so suspicion would then be on the Islamic State, which is believed to be increasing its profile in Afghanistan.

According to The Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED) cited by Afghanistan-watcher Frud Bezhan, a journalist with the Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFERL), there have been 44,655 fatalities in Afghanistan from January 1 to December 8, 2018.

These include civilians, government forces and militants. This places Afghanistan ahead of Yemen and Syria — yet, the narrative is about the latter two, even in India.

As the security situation in Afghanistan worsened and the Taliban gained territory, with the US unable to put more soldiers on the ground, this year the US dropped more bombs than in any other year of this war. Withdrawal of ground forces will only mean greater reliance on air attacks.

The cycle of violence increased early in 2018 as the rivalry between the Taliban and the Islamic State spilled out on the streets of Kabul. Dr. Shanthie Mariet D'Souza wrote (Mantraya Analysis, #22 February 22, 2018) that although the government played down these incidents, the insurgents were successful in getting renewed international media attention in this battle of the narratives.

The Taliban also stepped up their activities because of an inadequate government response. The Taliban were now “a decentralised rural insurgency with undiminished ability to target urban centres”. Estimates about how much territory is under Taliban control vary, but it is substantial — even up to 40%.

In the next few months from now, one can expect the Taliban to drag the negotiations while pretending to be earnest about the process, and then come back in the spring of 2019 with renewed vigour.

The Taliban and their mentors, Pakistan, knew they just had to wait it out. This became very clear when President Obama announced in 2009 that the US would leave Afghanistan in 2011. In the immediate future, the Afghan government will possibly yield more ground to the Taliban.

In recent months, very little has been heard about the Haqqani Network. The Pakistanis are possibly keeping it under control for a final assault.

The Taliban have not evolved into a political movement and have remained a jihadi force. It is highly unlikely that the Taliban will accept the present Afghan constitution, and would insist on governance under Islamic law. A Taliban victory after a deal with the US will only bail out the US — without bringing peace to the country. Afghanistan could easily break out into ethnic, sectarian, regional and tribal tensions.

There is also the question of the increasing profile of the Islamic State remnants now in Afghanistan, with their alliances with others. As Andrew Bacevich put it very bluntly, “The United States’ war in Afghanistan began with an illusion that it was incumbent upon the US to liberate and transform that country. The war in Afghanistan will end, as the Vietnam War ended — in shame and abandonment.” (The war in Afghanistan isn't a 'stalemate.' The US has lost.")

There are reports of the Islamic State in alliance with the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan and Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan gaining some presence in northern Afghanistan, close to countries like Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, which have had traditionally close ties with Russia. They also have a presence in Nangarhar and Paktika provinces bordering Pakistan. It is possible they will later drift to other pastures east or north.

With the recent discovery of ISIS cells in Delhi and UP, a likelihood of such cells having been established or functioning under the banner of ISIS elsewhere as well would be a matter of great worry for the Indian security apparatus. It is unlikely the Arabs operate them, but merely some locals using the franchise’s name, or induced to do so.

Pakistan may feel the loss of American largesse in case peace negotiations are successful. Pakistan has meanwhile worked out deals with the UAE, Saudi Arabia and China to keep some funds flowing in to lift its battered economy.

There is another possible gain. Russia and China will also show greater interest in affairs in Afghanistan, which would be in line with Pakistan’s interests in Afghanistan, so long as the US is kept out.

There is another aspect that needs to be kept in mind as the Great Game may continue in different forms. US President Trump recently tweeted that the Saudi government had agreed to help finance the rebuilding of Syria. This could be a dual-purpose exercise, which provides business opportunities to American industry to build what they themselves, with Saudi Arabia, first helped destroy. The hope is that this will keep the Russians and China away — or, at least, prevent them from being in control. This plan could be replicated in Afghanistan for the same reasons.

Once the US leaves Afghanistan, it will rapidly lose interest in Pakistan — and even the region. There would be a loss of rent to Pakistan — but it will also see this as an opportunity to strengthen its control in Afghanistan.

For this, it will want to pretend to keep peace with India — it will make all the polite noises about living in peace to keep its eastern border quiet. It can be expected to keep the Khalistan and Kashmir issues on the back-burner until Afghanistan is ‘sorted out’, with its India-specific jihadi outfits intact.

Pakistan will see a Taliban victory in Afghanistan as a vindication of is policies, and both the Taliban and Pakistan will depict this as a victory of the faith over another superpower. This will be enough encouragement to unleash its assiduously nurtured India-specific Ghazwa-e-Hind battalions against India.

We need not be beguiled into believing otherwise.



https://www.orfonline.org/research/...ld-unleash-ghazwa-e-hind-against-india-46870/

Oh god, this is getting annoying.

 

[maverick1977]

Nothing more pathetic or inferior than this.

Apni aukat dekh le khudki ankhon se.Surrenders whole army then smiles like a coward and talks about 'a game.This is true face of ghazi martial race lol.We used these guys as slave labour for building railway tracks in india lol till bhutto came begging.Dreaming of ghazwa,beta jo adha pakistan bacha hai woh bhi nahi rehega agar koshish ki toh.

Pathetic idiot! You supported terrorist organization Mukhti bahni and exploited our internal situation and prepared for 8 months to attack with 5:1 ratio, 240k Indian troops against 53k regular forces. You also had a support of 170k mukhti, surrounded by 3 sides... no a feat to celebrate...
Pakistan already took 1/3 of Indian Kashmir, come take it before Pakistan comes all the way to red fort and replace your taringa with pakistan flag ... saray jahan say will be replaced by Pak sar Zameen, already Kashmir’s are doing this ... there is nothing u can do, one day you will fall, since you haven’t been able to control the situation in last 70 years, the opposition will get stronger and stronger ... Muslims did it for 1000 years, will do it again ... you don’t have it in you ,.. and will never will be, be afraid be really afraid, Pakistan will come again

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

Nothing more pathetic or inferior than this.

Apni aukat dekh le khudki ankhon se.Surrenders whole army then smiles like a coward and talks about 'a game.This is true face of ghazi martial race lol.We used these guys as slave labour for building railway tracks in india lol till bhutto came begging.Dreaming of ghazwa,beta jo adha pakistan bacha hai woh bhi nahi rehega agar koshish ki toh.

If you are trying to piss me off, then you won’t succeed there.

Your hate has no more currency.

 

[PakSarzameen5823]

Lol,ulta nanga karke marenge.Koshish karle.Isbar rona mat.

Don't cry like a bitch 'its part of the game and smile when you are surrendering unconditionally'.We made these guys build our railway tracks in india,lol.Thats labour.

Then bhutto came begging to shimla and pakistan was printing stamps like this.

Ghazi martial race.

Of course, I'd expect an idiot like you to not only be unable to take a joke, but also use an example as dumb as this one to try and actually suggest Muslims are somehow inferior fighters to Indians. The PA was outnumbered 15 times over, and were not put into labour camps. Bhutto didn't come "begging" either, on the contrary, he used political skill to regain whatever was lost. That's called playing smart, and it shows we're more than just brawns.

Can't say the same for you though. You started a war and gained almost nothing, giving up almost all of what little you did achieve at Shimla.

And this whole incident is nothing compared to hundreds of years of Muslim rule over your people. Your natural position for much of history was to sweep our streets and clean our homes.

You want to see some Ghazis? I'll give you some:

MM Alam - Shot down 5 Indian aircraft in under a minute, creating a world record

Shabbir Sharif - Defeated an Indian company commander in hand to hand combat upon his request, and along with his men repulsed 15 Indian attempts to take his position, destroying 4 tanks and killing 43 Indians

Tufail Muhammad - He and his men removed Indians who had occupied a village in East Pakistan, with Tufail continuing his mission even after taking a bullet to the stomach and eventually bashing an Indian's skull in with his helmet

Shahbaz Khan Kamboh - Punjabi general of the Mughal Empire, he fought battles in the Bengal and the Deccan while also engaging in administrative affairs

Ahmed Shah Durrani - Pashtun warlord who established his own empire and crippled the Marathas at the Battle of Panipat, killing and enslaving every last one of them that was present

Amir Timur - Turco-Mongol (just like the Hazaras) warlord who looted and depopulated Delhi

Shah Jahan - Mughal Sultan from Lahore who waged wars of expansion across India

(if you're wondering why the faces are blacked out, it's because it's haram to depict faces in drawings)

 

[Arsalan 345]

Lol,ulta nanga karke marenge.Koshish karle.Isbar rona mat.

Don't cry like a bitch 'its part of the game and smile when you are surrendering unconditionally'.We made these guys build our railway tracks in india,lol.Thats labour.

Then bhutto came begging to shimla and pakistan was printing stamps like this.

Ghazi martial race.

 

[Liquidmetal]

We must know our enemy and his thinking.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Console yourself as much as you want.We showed you your real aukat.If you were real warriors you would have stood,fought and died ,not surrendered like a herd of sheep while politely smiling and talking about 'playing a game'.No amount of consoling yourself with dead central asian warlords from failed countries will help you.Aukat pata chal gaya tumhare ghazio ka.They built our railway tracks and begged IA to save themselves and their women from muktis .Lost in both west and eastern front lol despite having advantage in west.What happened to your plan 'defence of east pakistan lies in the west'?Agar harne ka dar tha to 'Operation chengiz khan' shuru kiyun ki.Khud ki to ek bhi hero nahin hai..ban ne chala chengiz khan - the greatest butcher of muslims in history ,and talking about islam.Lol rehne de beta.Phir se ekbar apni aukat dekh le ghazi mian -

Ek niazi ne surrender kiya tha apni chaddi utar kar,hopefully the niazi ruling pakistan now is smarter.Koi ghazwa ki koshish ki to jo adha baki hai woh bhi nahin rahega.

Console yourself as much as you want.We showed you your real aukat.If you were real warriors you would have stood,fought and died ,not surrendered like a herd of sheep while politely smiling and talking about 'playing a game'.No amount of consoling yourself with dead central asian warlords from failed countries will help you.Aukat pata chal gaya tumhare ghazio ka.They built our railway tracks and begged IA to save themselves and their women from muktis .Lost in both west and eastern front lol despite having advantage in west.What happened to your plan 'defence of east pakistan lies in the west'?Agar harne ka dar tha to 'Operation chengiz khan' shuru kiyun ki.Khud ki to ek bhi hero nahin hai..ban ne chala chengiz khan - the greatest butcher of muslims in history ,and talking about islam.Lol rehne de beta.Phir se ekbar apni aukat dekh le ghazi mian -

Ek niazi ne surrender kiya tha apni chaddi utar kar,hopefully the niazi ruling pakistan now is smarter.Koi ghazwa ki koshish ki to jo adha baki hai woh bhi nahin rahega.

But then why is india currently too weak, powerless and incapable of fighting the Pakistan military despite all the big talk and hot air on the internet???????.......

That too when india is more than 7× bigger than Pakistan, has access to the world's most advanced weapons systems, has the entire backing of the West and Russia???........

Why is india so frightened????.......why don't you stop talking and grow a a pair?.............I forgot, indians have the smallest out of all the races of men........:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/6161691.stm


PS Pakistan is more than 7× smaller than india yet controls about 45% of Kashmir and there is nothing indian kind can do about it............. those are near impossible odds.............why is the 7× bigger enemy so weak and pathetic against us?.........