AZADPAKISTAN2009
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 37,669
- Reaction score
- 68
- Country
- Location
Very Nice design , close to larger commercial units understandable why such a plane would add to training new pilot's need
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bangladesh have itdreams are free of cost
The Chinese L15 is a very similar design ( because of Hongdu Collaboration with Yakovlev) and a strong contender as our choice of LIFT TRAINER.
If we can negotiate on price and ToT with China, it might be the way to go.
For those who are thinking T-38 Talon, let us not forget that T-38 was developed as a Trainer in 1960's and even with upgrades it would be lacking the LIFT criteria.
Honourable Sir,
Since a LIFT or advanced trainer is hardly likely to be used in combat against state of the art fighters; era when it was designed is not so important. Modern trainers are built with more efficient engines and with flying characteristics similar to the front line fighters, hence substantially reducing cost of converting training a rookie pilot into a proficient fighter pilot.
The fact that T-38 has been in service in advanced trainer role with the USAF & the US Navy for more than 50 years where pilots eventually go on to fly F-15’s and F-18’s is proof that T-38 is an exceptionally good trainer. I would not dare to challenge views of a professional, but don’t you think if we could get T-38 really cheap (say $10-million each after complete re-built), these birds could satisfy PAF advanced trainer needs for the next 20 years? With more than one 1000 Talons having been built; we should be able to pick up second hand T-38’s for a song for the spare parts.
I am not advocating that we should definitely go for T-38 but IMHO for the cash starved PAF, it is a propositions worth serious consideration.
good for you, wait, and whilst your waiting build the size or your bank balance.to the pakistan airforce not you.
Air Force is not my area of expertise. @Pakistanisage is the right person to answer this question
Honourable Sir,
Since a LIFT or advanced trainer is hardly likely to be used in combat against state of the art fighters; era when it was designed is not so important. Modern trainers are built with more efficient engines and with flying characteristics similar to the frontline fighters, hence substantially reducing cost of converting training a rookie pilot into a proficient fighter pilot.
The fact that T-38 has been in service in advanced trainer role with the USAF & the US Navy for more than 50 years where pilots eventually go on to fly F-15’s and F-18’s is proof that T-38 is an exceptionally good trainer. I would not dare to challenge views of a professional, but don’t you think if we could get T-38 really cheap (say $10-million each after complete re-built), these birds could satisfy PAF advanced trainer needs for the next 20 years? With more than one 1000 Talons having been built; we should be able to pick up second hand T-38’s for a song for the spare parts.
I am not advocating that we should definitely go for T-38 but IMHO for the cash starved PAF, it is a propositions worth serious consideration.
good for you, and make sure you pay your taxesWe will I.A
good for you, and make sure you pay your taxes
Very Nice design , close to larger commercial units understandable why such a plane would add to training new pilot's need