erwineugene
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2013
- Messages
- 48
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
The Thing is TNW in today's war scenarios are useless, they are the result of doctrines found on the war scenarios which developed when most of the battlefield was static(post 2nd world war , nato hoped to destroy the red army formation in case of war in eastern europe using tnw's ) if not static at least not as dynamic as today's. your tnw doctrine against hypothetical cold start xpect a lot of static nature of battlefield, u cant find amassed enemy formations so u can throw ur nuke at them.Nice assessment
BTW this is first time im saying this to an India.
Well the CSD is certainly going to be held in Desert Areas thats why u have new Army HQs in Jaipur, Rajistan India. And given the exercises u had been doing since 2004 on CSD r in deserts as the terrain of desert is open from all sides and its very hard to defend there as enemy can comes from anywhere even from back. Where as in Punjab areas where there r soft fertile lands there r many obstacles specially for Tanks and MIBs like Canals, Rivers, Jungles etc etc its very very hard to surprise the enemy with IBG level attacks and also since 5 war Pakistan has massively fortified its positions in those areas and tell u the truth Punjab province has highest density of population in entire pakistan which has 90 million population out of 180 million.
In Punjab our top command is not worried as we have make sure there that we can defend our country there with full satisfaction. but the barren deserts where population is close to none r problem and the border areas of South East of Pakistan dont have any population as the small patches which were there already were shifted to other areas making it a complete battle ready centers. So if we nuke a barren desert which as no population nor there is any chance of human presence in future r fair option in the sole purpose of defending our motherland.
if ur saying that its a deterrence,well possessing nuke weps itself give deterrence, pak dont need to develop(or waste much precious resources). even if it is a counter force wep or counter value detonating a nuke wep on conventional force will be followed by a nuke war .
if the two opposing countries posses nukes(strategic) it would be a deterrent,if one posses tactical(at least which actively threatens to use it ) then that is an enticement on nuke war ...why the pak doctrine misses this logic.
Last edited: