Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MLRS with enhanced range. More than A 100
New Recruit
I think it not a threat to s400, more likely its like a heavy counter for large infantry formation, hence if pakistan use tactical nuclear weapon India respond with stragic nuclear strike, so best option to stop India in it foots by any misadventures is using a heavy long range artillery that can out range any conventional Indian artillery in initial strike and use paf to do followup , also not only s400 any modern Indian Sam's can intercept artillery rocket barges, even Pakistan Sam's too do the same because artillery follow a ballistic path and less travel speed than normal ballistic missile, all of Indian Sam's even their short range aksah also have anti srbm capability,So s400 or any anti aircraft missile cannot be placed near 150 km of border range.
This is also good for hitting airbases near border
New Recruit
Is it so? I believe S400 can intercept significant number of missiles fired.Major threat for indian S400 batteries
By the grace of ALLAH,
Congrats everyone
Not to forget that it's just the first version. I dreamt Fatah-2 in very near future with some more punch & above all, surprising range.
View attachment 704408
CHUNMOO K-MLRS K239 130MM 227MM 239MM
Multi-caliber Launch Rocket System South Korea
I am hoping when all tests are done of fatah. It turns out to be something like this at least its launcher. And finally we are coming out of Nasr mentality and thinking of giving conventional fight a chance.
I remember A100 MRLS max range to be 100Km. Is it 120Km instead...as u r stating here?yaap more than 120 KM A-100, so the question is
Is it the version of enhance range version of A-100 and IF it is then Why increase the range to just 20 KM ... ??
OR Is it derived from Nasar Missile which in its final version have range of 70 KM and as we are aware that Nuclear warhead of Nasr was supposedly heavier then other conventional warhead so by converting warhead of Nasar Missile to lighter conventional warhead is the basis of new MLRS .... ????
BUT in any case indigenous MLRS was in work from some time in fact I think from more than 5 years or so .... so this disclosure is a welcome development
Lmao first of all S400 are potent systems against fighter plane not against any misisle or rocket due their sheer speed. Lastly if any battery has to be targeted than volly of rockets will be rained on the target at the same time thus overwhelming that system.Is it so? I believe S400 can intercept significant number of missiles fired.
Is it so? I believe S400 can intercept significant number of missiles fired.
MLRS can serve the primary purpose of Denial of Service attack against S400 or for that matter any SAM system.. As S400 can intercept multiple targets, to counter that only solution is to launch more rockets within no time than it's limitations, while S400 will be busy intercepting these dummy missiles, you can launch a NASR or some other potent missile to do the actual damage. So MLRS are ideal for this job.Is it so? I believe S400 can intercept significant number of missiles fired.
UnderstoodWhy to derail topic by your own posting? There's no need to post such garbage here my friend.