What's new

Pakistan condemns Indian Security Forces killing of grandfather in front of toddler

Are these pictures a proof that Indian forces weren't involved in the child's grandpa's murder?
What's your theory - the Indian forces killed a CRPF jawan, injured 3 more Jawans themselves, then shot the grandpa, then took the kid to safety to his parents?

Or

Terrorists attacked CRPF jawans, killing one, injuring 3 and the kid's grandpa died in the crossfire and the Indian forces took him home?

What seems more plausible?
 
. . .
If they did it, then yes. To me Kashmiris are Indian citizens. Would you say the same if those responsible turn out to be terrorists or as you chaps call them "freedom fighters"?
You call your country the biggest democracy on this planet. Why aren't you granting Kashmiris the right to choose whether they want to live with you lot or not? Just because you know that you will get unfavorable results, you guys have started changing the demography of the region.

There's a difference between a freedom fighter and a terrorist. When a majority of a population is against you, you call them freedom fighters. When a handful of people start an armed struggle on behalf of a foreign country, it's called terrorism. Balochi separatists are therefore terrorists, who do not hesitate to enter stock exchanges on Indian orders, while the whole province doesn't agree with their demands. Kashmiris on the other hand are freedom fighters, because they are fighting for the right of self determination that concerns their majority.

And if you are sure that they are few and do not represent the majority, gather some courage to hold a referendum.

I am ok if they decide to live alone and not joining Pakistan. I am even ok if a combined referendum is annonced and AJK decides to be independent.
 
Last edited:
.
What's your theory - the Indian forces killed a CRPF jawan, injured 3 more Jawans themselves, then shot the grandpa, then took the kid to safety to his parents?

Or

Terrorists attacked CRPF jawans, killing one, injuring 3 and the kid's grandpa died in the crossfire and the Indian forces took him home?

What seems more plausible?

Your terrorist army is doing what they are best at. And killed this kid's grandpa. Seems more plausible
 
.
What's your theory - the Indian forces killed a CRPF jawan, injured 3 more Jawans themselves, then shot the grandpa, then took the kid to safety to his parents?

Or

Terrorists attacked CRPF jawans, killing one, injuring 3 and the kid's grandpa died in the crossfire and the Indian forces took him home?

What seems more plausible?
Dont give stupid analogies.

Do you walk over a body of innocent like this?

Or

Do you walk over a body of someone you hate like this?

The answer is obvious right?
 
. .
May Allah destroy peace'fools and give us leadership with sense of dignity.
 
.
Let me leave these here, thanks to @Spring Onion
Eb1azLQWkAEUxFh
 
. . .
What's your theory - the Indian forces killed a CRPF jawan, injured 3 more Jawans themselves, then shot the grandpa, then took the kid to safety to his parents?

Or

Terrorists attacked CRPF jawans, killing one, injuring 3 and the kid's grandpa died in the crossfire and the Indian forces took him home?

What seems more plausible?
It is a possibility that CPRF killed the grandpa.. you have to check the history of indiscriminate firing done by your forces.. One example:

kashmir_pellet_gun_victims_6.jpg


https://time.com/longform/pellet-gu...e,charity that monitors military technologies.
 
. .
. .
Back
Top Bottom