Pakistan CANNOT "conquer Kashmir through war" : Hina Rabbani Khar

[BetterPakistan]

The subject here is how is what Pak does is helping it in J&K ?

Why do you guys run away when someone shows you mirror?

 

[third eye]

Why do you guys run away when someone shows you mirror?

Why cant you guys read & feel upset when its pointed out & your comprehension is questioned ?

 

[BetterPakistan]

Why cant you guys read & feel upset when its pointed out & your comprehension is questioned ?

Why we feel upset? You should be ashamed instead because in Pakistan occupied kashmir, we don't uses our army to keep Pakistan occupied kashmir with us. We don't rule Pakistan occupied kashmir tyrannically. We don't brutally kill people in Pakistan occupied kashmir. People don't protest against our administration there and in the entire world. Everyone knows Indian occupied kashmir is control brutally. natives in Indian occupied kashmir protest against your govt and raises Pakistan flag to show whom they are with. You won't be able to keep it with you for ever because freedom comes after struggle and kashmiris never bow down in front of your 0.7 million force nor Pak will leave them ever.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

'We cannot conquer Kashmir through war'

ISLAMABAD: Former foreign minister Hina Rabbani Khar on Sunday said Pakistan cannot "conquer Kashmir through war" and progress on the issue can only me made in an environment of mutual trust with India.

"I believe that Pakistan cannot conquer Kashmir through war and if we cannot do that, the option we are left with is dialogue, and dialogue can only proceed with a partner with which we have normal relations and a certain level of mutual trust," Khar said in an interview with Geo News.

She claimed that the PPP government, despite being a coalition government, had tried its best to normalise ties with India through relaxation of visa rules and by normalising trade ties.

"The issues between the two countries cannot be resolved in a hostile environment."

Khar, who remained Pakistan's foreign minister from 2011 to 2013, maintained that the Kashmir issue can be resolved "if we continue to talk on the issue, then we will reach somewhere".

Answering a question regarding the military's influence on Pakistan's foreign policy, she said that it is a diplomat's job to carry forward the military's perspective on issues where the military is a relevant stake holder.

Khar stated some people believe that the issue can only be resolved "if there is a BJP government in India and a military government in Pakistan".

Khar observed that Musharraf gave India adequate relaxation on the Kashmir issue during his tenure.

'US tilt towards India driven by economy'
When asked about the recent downturn in Pak-US ties and the US' tilt towards India, the former foreign minister said the US tilt towards India is driven by economy, market and because of a wish to contain the rising power of China.

"Now let us ask ourselves, is US moving towards India because India is a nuclear state, or because it is a military power, no, it is people power and their democratic traditions, if we want to compete, lets compete on these grounds," said Khar.

The former foreign minister also termed Pakistan's entry into Afghan Jihad a 'mistake' and maintained that Pakistan's dependence on US is more in "our minds than on the ground".

She termed it as Zia's mistake for helping the US in the 80s, and added Musharraf had no option when it came to helping the US in 2001.

'Foreign office or political office'
Criticising the approach and the performance of ministry of foreign affairs, she asked if the foreign office has turned into a political office.

"The foreign office is busy nowadays in apprising the nation about some country's leader sending flowers to the prime minister or inquiring about his health," said Khar.

Khar maintained that Pakistan's current foreign policy is "reactive and not active" as Pakistan is not taking its own line or direction but is only reacting on the circumstances arising in the region or world at large.

"In 60 years, we have taught our children that our national identity is to hate someone, and we are doing it with those who are physically the nearest. Hostile with India and now hostile with Afghanistan," said the former foreign minister.

Summing up her answer, she maintained that the basic objective of Pakistan's foreign policy should be to serve the people of the country and not the pursuit of power.

she is right
NOR can Indian cold start which has been changed into Cold Stop thanks to Babur Missile
lol

Why cant you guys read & feel upset when its pointed out & your comprehension is questioned ?

unfair and compound question Sir
very unfair

by the way I agree with the Lady

 

[BetterPakistan]

she is right
NOR can Indian cold start which has been changed into Cold Stop thanks to Babur Missile
lol

yup neither india nor Pakistan can conquer kashmir through war.

 

[Maj.Osmani]

yup neither india nor Pakistan can conquer kashmir through war.

You people forget the history and facts Azad Jammu and Kashmir liberated by war and its is the only option to solve this issue either in war or after the war when people can digest bitter decisions by the Govts either Pakistani or Indian and this is the ultimate truth and fate of this region.
@Irfan Baloch @Joe Shearer

 

[BetterPakistan]

You people forget the history and facts Azad Jammu and Kashmir liberated by war and its is the only option to solve this issue either in war or after the war when people can digest bitter decisions by the Govts either Pakistani or Indian and this is the ultimate truth and fate of this region.
@Irfan Baloch @Joe Shearer

War won't do anything. It will only bled out both kashmirs nothing else.

 

[Maj.Osmani]

War won't do anything. It will only bled out both kashmirs nothing else.

You are wrong brother i am talking about that war....Which is long due...If something is eminent then start that thing according to your own liking.

Issues are Kashmir and Kashmiri People

Water and matter of national respect


No one in both nations so powerful to make some decision against the national honor so only war gives them a chance where effected people for peace could accept that things which in peace time they even don't like to talk.

 

[BetterPakistan]

You are wrong brother i am talking about that war....Which is long due...If something is eminent then start that thing according to your own liking.

Issues are Kashmir and Kashmiri People

Water and matter of national respect


No one in both nations so powerful to make some decision against the national honor so only war gives them a chance where effected people for peace could accept that things which in peace time they even don't like to talk.

I understand what you are indicating but do you think Pak should go for this option in current scenario? We can only go to that extent if Pak is a strong, influential and might economy with billions of dollars invested in military to conquer J&K

 

[Maj.Osmani]

I understand what you are indicating but do you think Pak should go for this option in current scenario? We can only go to that extent if Pak is a strong, influential and might economy with billions of dollars invested in military to conquer J&K

I am not saying Pakistan could exercise this option but we should avail a chance we missed twice in history once during Indo-China war second time during Kargil…Musharaf did the mistake he should thrown N.S during Kargil.

 

[BetterPakistan]

Musharaf did the mistake he should thrown N.S during Kargil.

I agree with that 100%. That was the best time to conquer J&K. Musharraf missed the opportunity. One thing more Musharraf was really a brave men, very brave men who invaded in J&K himself with army and prove what our ground forces are capable of but NS couldn't stood in front of US

 

[Stephen Cohen]

second time during Kargil…Musharaf did the mistake he should thrown N.S during Kargil.

So you are saying that In Kargil war you could have defeated India
--why are you making things up

Where as the fact is that Pakistan was badly defeated in Kargil

 

[Sinnerman108]

'We cannot conquer Kashmir through war'

ISLAMABAD: Former foreign minister Hina Rabbani Khar on Sunday said Pakistan cannot "conquer Kashmir through war" and progress on the issue can only me made in an environment of mutual trust with India.

"I believe that Pakistan cannot conquer Kashmir through war and if we cannot do that, the option we are left with is dialogue, and dialogue can only proceed with a partner with which we have normal relations and a certain level of mutual trust," Khar said in an interview with Geo News.

She claimed that the PPP government, despite being a coalition government, had tried its best to normalise ties with India through relaxation of visa rules and by normalising trade ties.

"The issues between the two countries cannot be resolved in a hostile environment."

Khar, who remained Pakistan's foreign minister from 2011 to 2013, maintained that the Kashmir issue can be resolved "if we continue to talk on the issue, then we will reach somewhere".

Answering a question regarding the military's influence on Pakistan's foreign policy, she said that it is a diplomat's job to carry forward the military's perspective on issues where the military is a relevant stake holder.

Khar stated some people believe that the issue can only be resolved "if there is a BJP government in India and a military government in Pakistan".

Khar observed that Musharraf gave India adequate relaxation on the Kashmir issue during his tenure.

'US tilt towards India driven by economy'
When asked about the recent downturn in Pak-US ties and the US' tilt towards India, the former foreign minister said the US tilt towards India is driven by economy, market and because of a wish to contain the rising power of China.

"Now let us ask ourselves, is US moving towards India because India is a nuclear state, or because it is a military power, no, it is people power and their democratic traditions, if we want to compete, lets compete on these grounds," said Khar.

The former foreign minister also termed Pakistan's entry into Afghan Jihad a 'mistake' and maintained that Pakistan's dependence on US is more in "our minds than on the ground".

She termed it as Zia's mistake for helping the US in the 80s, and added Musharraf had no option when it came to helping the US in 2001.

'Foreign office or political office'
Criticising the approach and the performance of ministry of foreign affairs, she asked if the foreign office has turned into a political office.

"The foreign office is busy nowadays in apprising the nation about some country's leader sending flowers to the prime minister or inquiring about his health," said Khar.

Khar maintained that Pakistan's current foreign policy is "reactive and not active" as Pakistan is not taking its own line or direction but is only reacting on the circumstances arising in the region or world at large.

"In 60 years, we have taught our children that our national identity is to hate someone, and we are doing it with those who are physically the nearest. Hostile with India and now hostile with Afghanistan," said the former foreign minister.

Summing up her answer, she maintained that the basic objective of Pakistan's foreign policy should be to serve the people of the country and not the pursuit of power.

She is stating what was practiced by Gen Zia decades ago.
She represents a political party that reversed the gains made in 1980s

 

[Maj.Osmani]

Where as the fact is that Pakistan was badly defeated in Kargil

Ask about Kargil war from any truthful Indian Army officer.

 

[Stephen Cohen]

Ask about Kargil war from any truthful Indian Army officer.

Of course we have talked about it in our Friend circles

The more pertinent question is what does the whole world ; Pakistani analysts ; writers
and expertswho appear on TV shows say and believe

Anyway forget it ; there are millions of articles and TV shows on Kargil

It has been debated so much ; there is NOTHING left to debate